Moderator: Community Team
Lucarilover240 wrote:pmchugh wrote:I find the pole results somewhat disturbing.
If you spilt it into just three sections:
For (luca level, love it) -5
Neutral (its ok, meh)- 11
Agianst (could do without it, hate it, kill it with fire) - 14
Meanly less than 50% are agianst it, I thought that it would be more like:
For- 2
Neutral -5
Against- 23
I must admit, I'm rather surprised by the poll results myself. Apparently, I'm not alone in my furryness here, other people just arent speaking up. I NEVER expected 4 Lucarilover240-level votes.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
b.k. barunt wrote:Hey Lucari, are you into the hamster thing too? Or was it gerbils? Anyhow they're both furry little critters, so do you like, you know . . .
Honibaz
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
b.k. barunt wrote::shock:![]()
Honibaz
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
b.k. barunt wrote:Well . . . not in so many words . . . has that actually happened? I mean, did the gerbil really die? How rude.
Honibaz
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:The gerbil should've had a gun.
got tonkaed wrote:Also, is that dog have gay sex and then eating its own vomit...thats tremendous.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
pimpdave wrote:
Skittles! wrote:b.k. barunt wrote:Hey Lucari, are you into the hamster thing too? Or was it gerbils? Anyhow they're both furry little critters, so do you like, you know . . .
Honibaz
I'm going to put it plain and simple. Lucari, are you the one who inserts gerbils into their arse and then can not get it out again, resulting in the death of a gerbil inside your anus?
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
sheepofdumb wrote:Now that you've seen my quirk, albeit the perverted form of it, what's yours?
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
MeDeFe wrote:MaleAlphaThree wrote:I'd like to be filed under "Mild Furry".
I sure as hell want something that's more than majority human. To elaborate, I don't mind if she's got like fox ears and a tail or some extra shit that doesn't really look freakish or anything (all of it from popular mammals: dogs, cats, whatever else people tend to love as pets (bears?)) but restricted to just a couple animal features. Absolutely no to anything reptilian (guessing that goes from furry to scaly, are there scalies out there??), and no to anything that is not obviously a couple [minor] genetic mutations away from being fully human.
I don't think I've even wanked off once to any of those furry pictures, or anime. Just haven't gotten around to it, I guess. Suppose I'll make a point to do it the next time my house is empty.
Out of curiosity, too furry or not?
MeDeFe wrote:Out of curiosity, too furry or not?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users