Wisse wrote:Fircoal wrote:Wisse wrote:wow 20 pages already
i'm glad that i'm not out in the first round
can we vote already?
YEs
i did edit my post already
Noob you DON"T EDIT!!!!
Moderator: Community Team
Senfive wrote:reverend_kyle wrote:As for why I just barely popped in? This thread doesnt have enough stars tildes and shit to grab my attention, and unless I remember I dont pop into off topics much anymore because it sucks so bad. Wicked really strikes me as suspicious, because she said she had the same win condition as last time, but the townies win condition has changed slightly since last time.
Have to agree with P GIZZLE your excuse was CRAP. Same as last game. You pop into the thread and throw out a name for a lynch. In andy's game you bandwagon, and in auto's you don't even do your role. Why do you sign up if you don't even check this forum?
Senfive wrote:Nyvek wrote:Sen said: VOTE NO LYNCH cause we have nothing solid at all and with this many players a no lynch is the best option for anyone Pro-Town atm. We have to wait as hard as that is.
Sen, I agree with some of your post, but not with your No Lynch proposial. Could you explain the benefit of a No Lynch that could be the correct choice, when the mafia gets to kill the correct choice every night that goes by. And please, something besides "If you don't agree with me, your obviously not pro-town."
And as far as suspicion. I will be first to take the gallows if no better choice is found. I stand by my belief a Random Lynch is better than no lynch at all, even if it means me taking the hit. But, should I be found Townie in death, take heed of the debate of RK and I.
Whats so hard to understand? You would rather lose 2 townies then 1? Also you lose one Townie and you give the Power roles on the Townie side another chance to go to work at night. Also whats this about don't say I am scum? You are the scummiest out there next to Fircoal. I will call out who I see as suspicious and is playing as Scum.
Fircoal wrote:What are you talking about, what makes me look like scum, a vote for truth, and a joke. REally, I'm being to trust myself(which I always did), supercram, and nyvek. Your start to look like mafia with every post that you make.
Nyvek wrote:Senfive wrote:Nyvek wrote:Sen said: VOTE NO LYNCH cause we have nothing solid at all and with this many players a no lynch is the best option for anyone Pro-Town atm. We have to wait as hard as that is.
Sen, I agree with some of your post, but not with your No Lynch proposial. Could you explain the benefit of a No Lynch that could be the correct choice, when the mafia gets to kill the correct choice every night that goes by. And please, something besides "If you don't agree with me, your obviously not pro-town."
And as far as suspicion. I will be first to take the gallows if no better choice is found. I stand by my belief a Random Lynch is better than no lynch at all, even if it means me taking the hit. But, should I be found Townie in death, take heed of the debate of RK and I.
Whats so hard to understand? You would rather lose 2 townies then 1? Also you lose one Townie and you give the Power roles on the Townie side another chance to go to work at night. Also whats this about don't say I am scum? You are the scummiest out there next to Fircoal. I will call out who I see as suspicious and is playing as Scum.
Sen said: Also whats this about don't say I am scum?
You added the comment.
Had another question though. RK and I went back and forth about his "joke" for about 6 pages. In your 14 quote summary, didn't feel like commenting? Or would you rather the issue just fade?
Nyvek wrote:Nyvek wrote:Sen said: Also whats this about don't say I am scum? You added the comment.
And please, something besides "If you don't agree with me, your obviously not pro-town."
Nyvek wrote:Had another question though. RK and I went back and forth about his "joke" for about 6 pages. In your 14 quote summary, didn't feel like commenting? Or would you rather the issue just fade?
Senfive wrote:Nyvek wrote:Had another question though. RK and I went back and forth about his "joke" for about 6 pages. In your 14 quote summary, didn't feel like commenting? Or would you rather the issue just fade?
Joking over 6 pages wasn't relavent in my looking over 20 pages when I got up.
Senfive wrote:Nyvek wrote:Nyvek wrote:Sen said: Also whats this about don't say I am scum? You added the comment.
And please, something besides "If you don't agree with me, your obviously not pro-town."
You didn't say this?Nyvek wrote:Had another question though. RK and I went back and forth about his "joke" for about 6 pages. In your 14 quote summary, didn't feel like commenting? Or would you rather the issue just fade?
Joking over 6 pages wasn't relavent in my looking over 20 pages when I got up.
onbekende wrote:nice, but serious, I can't see a good discussion now, unless you want to dig into the cop stuff
onbekende wrote:nice, but serious, I can't see a good discussion now, unless you want to dig into the cop stuff
supercram wrote:onbekende wrote:nice, but serious, I can't see a good discussion now, unless you want to dig into the cop stuff
only scum would want to dig into the cop stuff.
you have no thoughts on the going theories??
1. RK's "joking"
2. Nyvek's sniffing out power roles
3. SenFive's possible revenge kill of Mach
4. Wicked's possible framejob of SenFive
5. Fircoals constant vote changing.
6. supercram wanting a lynch no matter.
Users browsing this forum: Loose Canon