Moderator: Community Team
supercram wrote:go after someone who didn't vote for RD. if she is mafia. or else just hang out and wait a bit for more info.
if we're wrong on this, just lynch me because i obviously suck at mafia.
autoload wrote:Vote Count:
10 Nyvek (Master Bush, Wisse, Kokunai, trestain, Roger Dodger, for dummies, P Gizzle, reverend_kyle, supercram, wicked)
1 reverend kyle (Nyvek)
2 No Lynch (Senfive, XenHu)
5 Not Voting (Fircoal, Incandenza, vgmmaster, HoussamTheGreat, onbekende)
Incandenza wrote:I'd love to come up with something more substantial. Because the vig isn't looking for someone to investigate, and we can't lose too many more townies. (esp. if we fucked up the RD thing)
supercram wrote:Incandenza wrote:The question now is: if there is a vigilante (not speculating who, of course), who should they go after?
go after someone who didn't vote for RD.
vgmmaster wrote:
VOTE: Roger Dodger
Master Bush wrote:Cram, your vote for RD has to stand now, cause Incandenza's vote was the 8th lynch vote, and came before your unvote.
I did vote for RD, you just need to go back and look for it.
And not that it matters, but vgmmaster also voted for her, making it 9 votes.
supercram wrote:Incandenza wrote:I'd love to come up with something more substantial. Because the vig isn't looking for someone to investigate, and we can't lose too many more townies. (esp. if we fucked up the RD thing)
ok so i dunno when we stopped assuming that we had a serial killer. someone point me to that post please?
but if i were the vig, i might just NOT SHOOT ANYBODY because we are not sure.
if RD turns out to be mafia, SenFive looks shady (voting for P Gizzle in the face of a blatant roger dodger/trestain controversy).
Incandenza wrote:
And just looking at that, is it me or did houssam not post at all today?
Master Bush wrote:Player who have yet to give a single vote in 2 (game) days:Fircoal, Incandenza, vgmmaster, HoussamTheGreat
I would like to know why you 4 have yet to vote anyone?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
HoussamTheGreat wrote:Incandenza wrote:
And just looking at that, is it me or did houssam not post at all today?
That is correct. Have had a bunch of things going on and very little access. Having said that, reading this, I don't think I missed much. I think we are going or more accurately being slapped in all sorts of directions by an experienced mafia. I have no idea really why we are voting RD. I have no idea what the plan is if she is found to be mafia. To be townie? And for petes sake, if the second kill was indeed vigilante, which I doubt, he should really shut the hell up tonight and keep it in his pants!
Incandenza wrote:
Perhaps, but there hasn't been much heat at all on senfive this round, and if he's really going to go off so full-throttle against PG and fircoal, either he's the noobiest mafia of all time (his less-than-sterling performance in the last game would potentially bear this out), or he's just dead convinced of his reasoning.
Or he's mafia and both RD and trestain are as well, and he's trying to draw the heat off them both. That's barely remotely possible, and probably not worth following up.
I understand people FOSing him, though.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
wicked wrote:Those in the peanut gallery would like a vote count!!
supercram wrote:first came this...supercram wrote:Incandenza wrote:The question now is: if there is a vigilante (not speculating who, of course), who should they go after?
go after someone who didn't vote for RD.
then came this from vgmmaster...vgmmaster wrote:
VOTE: Roger Dodger
hmmm... conicidence?
Fircoal wrote:Senfive, is a noob, I don't know why he's so against me, and he probably is trying to get the heat off of RD, and tre, or he really thinks Me and PG, are mafia. He doesn't even listen to my explaintion that I posted before. I said them, because they had the least amount of proof on the lynch, and they barely post too. MAybe the 6th and 7th vote should be there too.
Incandenza wrote:Fircoal wrote:Senfive, is a noob, I don't know why he's so against me, and he probably is trying to get the heat off of RD, and tre, or he really thinks Me and PG, are mafia. He doesn't even listen to my explaintion that I posted before. I said them, because they had the least amount of proof on the lynch, and they barely post too. MAybe the 6th and 7th vote should be there too.
A noob, certainly. But mafia? I'm not so sure. If he was trying to deflect attention away from RD or trestain, he did a terrible, unsubtle job. He does seem awful zealous, but that might be noobery rather than mafia. Hard to say, but worth keeping a loose eye on.
When you say the 6th and 7th votes should be added too, I assume you mean added to the EOS pile you created, but do you mean the nyvek vote or the RD vote?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:Incandenza wrote:Fircoal wrote:Senfive, is a noob, I don't know why he's so against me, and he probably is trying to get the heat off of RD, and tre, or he really thinks Me and PG, are mafia. He doesn't even listen to my explaintion that I posted before. I said them, because they had the least amount of proof on the lynch, and they barely post too. MAybe the 6th and 7th vote should be there too.
A noob, certainly. But mafia? I'm not so sure. If he was trying to deflect attention away from RD or trestain, he did a terrible, unsubtle job. He does seem awful zealous, but that might be noobery rather than mafia. Hard to say, but worth keeping a loose eye on.
When you say the 6th and 7th votes should be added too, I assume you mean added to the EOS pile you created, but do you mean the nyvek vote or the RD vote?
MAybe sen is mafa, that I'm not sure about.
The Nvyek BAngwagon, the RD votes, had more proof to it, then the NYvek one.
vgmmaster wrote:According to the times, my post did come after yours. However, I would like to mention the fact that I clicked add reply before your post appeared. So, I was not aware of the fact that you posted beforehand.
P Gizzle wrote:fircoal wrote:MAybe sen is mafa, that I'm not sure about.
The Nvyek BAngwagon, the RD votes, had more proof to it, then the NYvek one.
i think Sen is
Roger Dodger wrote:someone can still unvote. votes still going til auto says so
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users