Conquer Club

North America: to be revisited later

Have an idea for a map? Discuss ideas and concepts here.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby oaktown on Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:58 pm

Tisha wrote:hurry up with the new draft, and this time control yourself... :lol:

I won't be around much for the next week, so a new draft will be slow in the making. I'm having second thoughts about the project anyway.

As for the comment about there being nothing wrong with the current map, I disagree. As a colorblind player I can't play the map without BOB telling me what territory is part of what region... and you are you sure that California and Arizona connect? :-k Both of these can be fixed, however, with a simple touch up, which may be the route I take.
Image
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby WidowMakers on Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:29 pm

I say do a Montreal style revamp. Same colors and layout just cleaned up.
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby oaktown on Sun Jul 05, 2009 9:44 pm

WidowMakers wrote:I say do a Montreal style revamp. Same colors and layout just cleaned up.

that's where I'm leaning. I have an idea for a nice satellite view map anyway, which I will reveal in due time.
Image
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby Scott-Land on Sun Jul 05, 2009 10:30 pm

oaktown wrote:... and you are you sure that California and Arizona connect? :-k Both of these can be fixed, however, with a simple touch up, which may be the route I take.


Yup about 4-5 hours to LA / Vegas from Phoenix
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby oaktown on Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:17 pm

Scott-Land wrote:
oaktown wrote:... and you are you sure that California and Arizona connect? :-k Both of these can be fixed, however, with a simple touch up, which may be the route I take.


Yup about 4-5 hours to LA / Vegas from Phoenix

That's not what I was getting at, and I got the states wrong anyway. Look at the old map and tell me if Nevada and Arizona connect.

Anyway, my point was that the map could use some touch-ups. But perhaps that is all it needs, just touch-ups. Again, I'll figure it out next week.
Image
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby lostatlimbo on Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:23 pm

Oak - I like the new look so far, though I think the mountains will need some work - as they currently look more like cloud formations than massive rock behemoths. :)

I know you said you'd rather not change gameplay, but one thing that always perturbed me on the old map was merging Washington State into Oregon, when states like Idaho, Montana and Wyoming all hold their own. It makes sense to combine the Dakotas, Carolinas, Virginias and New England, but doubling the size of Oregon and dropping Washington altogether has never made sense to me.

If you're unwilling to add Washington as a new territory, then at least could you change Oregon to "Pacific Northwest"? Its as valid a region name as New England, but much less... er.... clueless. :)

On that note, how about changing Belize to Guatemala, since the former is about 1/5th the size of the latter.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class lostatlimbo
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:56 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby Scott-Land on Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:26 pm

oaktown wrote:
Scott-Land wrote:
oaktown wrote:... and you are you sure that California and Arizona connect? :-k Both of these can be fixed, however, with a simple touch up, which may be the route I take.


Yup about 4-5 hours to LA / Vegas from Phoenix

That's not what I was getting at, and I got the states wrong anyway. Look at the old map and tell me if Nevada and Arizona connect.

Anyway, my point was that the map could use some touch-ups. But perhaps that is all it needs, just touch-ups. Again, I'll figure it out next week.


Old map ( not your old draft)-- yes California, Arizona and Nevada are adjacent and connecting.
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby lostatlimbo on Sun Jul 05, 2009 11:48 pm

Scott-Land wrote:Old map ( not your old draft)-- yes California, Arizona and Nevada are adjacent and connecting.


I think his point is that it is difficult to tell unless you get up real close and squint. Borders shouldn't be so obscured. Hence... you know... touch-ups, tweaks, keeping the baby, but throwing out the bathwater. Get it?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class lostatlimbo
 
Posts: 1386
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:56 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby DublinDoogey on Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:06 pm

lostatlimbo wrote:
I know you said you'd rather not change gameplay, but one thing that always perturbed me on the old map was merging Washington State into Oregon, when states like Idaho, Montana and Wyoming all hold their own. It makes sense to combine the Dakotas, Carolinas, Virginias and New England, but doubling the size of Oregon and dropping Washington altogether has never made sense to me.

If you're unwilling to add Washington as a new territory, then at least could you change Oregon to "Pacific Northwest"? Its as valid a region name as New England, but much less... er.... clueless. :)

On that note, how about changing Belize to Guatemala, since the former is about 1/5th the size of the latter.


My thoughts on this are that I wouldn't care if Oregon were changed to "Pacific Northwest." I only called that territory Oregon because I have family there but not in Washington state. As for Belize changing to Guatemala, I wouldn't want that simply because I have really enjoyed my time in Belize. And when I originally designed the map I took that approach with merged territories. Wisconsin and Minnesota are called Wisconsin because I live in Wisconsin.
User avatar
Private DublinDoogey
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby barterer2002 on Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:11 pm

While I like the old map Oak, I really do like your new approach. I've always had trouble figuring out where the impassables are between Western USA and Central USA. Its not bad when looking at just the map but putting a three digit number in there (or more precisely a two digit number with a color blind alpha in front of it)often obscures things. I'd like to see it cleaned up a bit and I also see no reason why you can't take the same artistic licences with rivers etal that DublinDoogey did.
Image
Image
User avatar
Sergeant barterer2002
 
Posts: 6311
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby barterer2002 on Mon Jul 06, 2009 12:12 pm

(While we're at it, why doesn't DublinDoogey have a mapmakers medal for this one?)
Image
Image
User avatar
Sergeant barterer2002
 
Posts: 6311
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 11:51 am

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby sully800 on Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:50 pm

barterer2002 wrote:(While we're at it, why doesn't DublinDoogey have a mapmakers medal for this one?)


This map came before the medals, and not all cartographers got their old medals unless they said something... at least that's my guess. There were tons of medals to hand out at once and the non vocal people were missed.
User avatar
Major sully800
 
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby DublinDoogey on Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:30 am

sully800 wrote:
barterer2002 wrote:(While we're at it, why doesn't DublinDoogey have a mapmakers medal for this one?)


This map came before the medals, and not all cartographers got their old medals unless they said something... at least that's my guess. There were tons of medals to hand out at once and the non vocal people were missed.


i've taken a few long breaks. i tend not to play when i'm at college. it's interesting to see what has changed, like medals, ratings, new maps, loss of old maps, etc.
User avatar
Private DublinDoogey
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby owenshooter on Tue Jul 07, 2009 12:34 am

new mexico looks really funky now...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Lieutenant owenshooter
 
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby ender516 on Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:25 am

If you are in the mood to change the place names on this map, I will mention that, if I remember my Grade 7 geography, the area marked Canadian Shield corresponds well with a good portion of what is known as the Hudson Bay Lowlands (fairly different terrain). The portion marked Ontario matches well with the Canadian Shield, and the Ottawa region corresponds to what nearly every provincial map calls Southern Ontario, which is where the vast majority of Ontarians live.
So, if you want to confuse things and get the Northerners riled up, change "Canadian Shield" to "Hudson Bay" (with or without the "Lowlands"), change "Ontario" to "Canadian Shield" and change "Ottawa" to "Ontario". Nobody in Canada likes Ottawa anyway. ;) Heck, lots of people in Ottawa don't like Ottawa! :lol:
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario

Re: North America: Draft!

Postby oaktown on Tue Jul 07, 2009 9:33 am

There will be no changes to gameplay. There will be no changes to territory names. There will be no new territories added.

This was meant to be a graphical revisit only, and now I'm thinking that isn't even a good idea. Since the conversation has now turned away from the point of this thread I'm requesting that this thread be stuck in the bin until I have time to rethink.
Image
User avatar
Captain oaktown
 
Posts: 4451
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:24 pm
Location: majorcommand

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby ender516 on Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:43 pm

Allow me to apologize for my part in leading the topic astray. I was not serious about the territory names. I was serious in my appreciation of the new look that you brought to this map and I hope you will return to it soon.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class ender516
 
Posts: 4455
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: Waterloo, Ontario

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby WidowMakers on Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:11 pm

Here is what I had in mind. Obviously there needs to be A LOT more work but I don't want to keep going if this is not desired or if oak is still working on it.

Image
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby a.sub on Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:13 pm

best of the 3 so far imo
User avatar
Cadet a.sub
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:07 am

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby RjBeals on Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:21 am

a.sub wrote:best of the 3 so far imo


agree.
Image
User avatar
Private RjBeals
 
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby WidowMakers on Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:02 pm

Trying to copy the old map as much as possible. The mountain impassable are going to be a challenge due to the straight lines and weird layout. Other than that it is fonts type and size plus 88 circle layout and a couple land and sea connections over the water.

Image
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby RjBeals on Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:48 am

hmm - you sure you're going to have room for the 88's? Looks a little cramped. Maybe post a sample image - other than that, it's near complete.
Image
User avatar
Private RjBeals
 
Posts: 2506
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:17 pm
Location: South Carolina, USA

Re: North America: to be revisited later

Postby WidowMakers on Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:30 am

I just used 22 pixel diameter circles and added a gradient to cut off the top and bottom. They should work with 888. I know I will need to adjust them along with the text to fit everything. Like I said the big issue is going to be the mountains and the small map.
Image
Major WidowMakers
 
Posts: 2774
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:25 am
Location: Detroit, MI

Previous

Return to Melting Pot: Map Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users