Mystery Banz

[stahrgazer]

When will these (former) Flamers stop infesting the board with their same old tired whining about the mods and unfair bans? I would suggest an immediate perma-ban but in my kindness I will accept an instant ban of 2 months and thread locking for any new threads like these.

That's a bait.

For the record, I'm no flamer, former or otherwise, but I'm still concerned about unfairness.

[the.killing.44]

If you didn't report it, then mods were hunting for it. If mods were hunting for it, that's targeting. If they're targeting bk for suggesting something about someone's panties, then they should target anyone for it.

They couldn't have just been reading the thread in which the post in question was posted?

[prismsaber]

When will these (former) Flamers stop infesting the board with their same old tired whining about the mods and unfair bans? I would suggest an immediate perma-ban but in my kindness I will accept an instant ban of 2 months and thread locking for any new threads like these.

That's a bait.

For the record, I'm no flamer, former or otherwise, but I'm still concerned about unfairness.

You don't support the site. Get premium - until then why concern yourself with some perceived unfairness? Your opinion is worth less than even the (former) Flamers.

[stahrgazer]

If you didn't report it, then mods were hunting for it. If mods were hunting for it, that's targeting. If they're targeting bk for suggesting something about someone's panties, then they should target anyone for it.

They couldn't have just been reading the thread in which the post in question was posted?

Of course they could; but still, seeking out "panties in a wad" as a final straw to a ban is 'hunting'.

[stahrgazer]

You don't support the site. Get premium - until then why concern yourself with some perceived unfairness? Your opinion is worth less than even the (former) Flamers.

I did support the site; had even purchased a year in advance, had created a premium-prize tournament, was working on more, and was toying with some maps.

Gee, if I did then, why not now?

For the very issue of unfairness you're so ticked that someone mentions.

[b.k. barunt]

When will these (former) Flamers stop infesting the board with their same old tired whining about the mods and unfair bans? I would suggest an immediate perma-ban but in my kindness I will accept an instant ban of 2 months and thread locking for any new threads like these.

Ah yes, primsaber and another of his helpful albeit slow witted suggestions - a permaban you say? And lock 'em down - when will you guys make this jewel of sagacity a mod?


Honibaz

[chaosfactor]

After the demise of Conquer clubs flame forum I found almost a dozen sites that could challenge our former hardcore in duels into the night..

I log on elsewhere for these battles right now, and as B.K knows, I have invited him incognito to duel alongside me if he wants..

Right now he is getting over his 30 day forum ban, so give him a break.

When it comes to flames on this forum, I have had to move with the times. The word no longer exists in my vocabulary within this realm.

Every mod from this kingdom cum is now tracking my movements (+B.K's also), scrutinizing our every move and every word, dissecting it in the hope that they, yes they, could be the axe that crunches on that last sound system that heralds the freedom of speech on this site.

As I initially said, I flame abroad now, for there is little reason for the greater posters to cling to the past in your dwindling little kingdom anymore. Perhaps a few veterans might remember the glorious days where conversation was abundant and free? Perhaps...

A flame is what you make it, if i re-arranged all these letters in this post and wore a turban, i am sure somewhere, someone will find an insult somehow..

What this sites perception of a flame entails apparently has no parameters. All of you people lost the plot several days after April the thirst. (01-04-09)

I do not flame anymore, I just mock.

Put that in your bible, and once you do, implement it

"Thou shall not mock"

[stahrgazer]

A flame is what you make it, if i re-arranged all these letters in this post and wore a turban, ...
put that in your bible...

I'm offended at the mixture of turban and bible in the same post

However... your post was witty; not flame, not bait. Are you losing your touch?

[b.k. barunt]

Witty is not good here, as it can easily be mistaken for flaming by our overzealous mods. I thought my telling fitz that he was acting like a little girl with her panties in a wad was witty and it got me a 30 day banz - funny though, i seem to remember our esteemed administrator lackattack (back in the early days before he made all that money off his volunteer mod squad) telling someone (Twildo?) to "pull up your big girl panties and get over it". My how things change.


Honibaz

[xelabale]

When will these (former) Flamers stop infesting the board with their same old tired whining about the mods and unfair bans? I would suggest an immediate perma-ban but in my kindness I will accept an instant ban of 2 months and thread locking for any new threads like these.

You have your panties in a wad over this - why? Are people not allowed to talk about bans and mods? It's banned to talk about banning? Where does that path lead to, I wonder......

List of forbidden topics on cc:
1 girls panties (AAFitz's or anyone's)
2 mods
3 bans
4 D*&(ng M(*&tard
5 Mocking people (for definition of mocking, please post and see if you get banned, then you'll find out, sucker)
6 FW

List of compulsory topics (note, members who do not post in at least 3 of these per week will be instantly banned):
1 your score
2 other people's score
3 I love cc because
4 I really love cc because
5 a new and interesting top 5 list
6 an old and boring top 5 list

[notyou2]

All this talk about panties is making me horny.

[clapper011]

When will these (former) Flamers stop infesting the board with their same old tired whining about the mods and unfair bans? I would suggest an immediate perma-ban but in my kindness I will accept an instant ban of 2 months and thread locking for any new threads like these.

fellas...how about we keep out the baiting? oh and as per the forum guidelines...no immediate bans would take place in this case....or any other for that matter..unless there were prior infractions. as per community guidelines http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7785 :

[BoganGod]

Wow, BK hasn't copped another ban yet. He/she/it mustn't be trying hard enough this time.

[b.k. barunt]

Patience my good man - Rome was not built in a day.


Honibaz

[notyou2]

Please keep the the talk on topic......panties

[b.k. barunt]

Honibaz

[jonesthecurl]

Suspenders!
Whalebone corsets!
Don't get your trunks in a turmoil!

[hwhrhett]

List of forbidden topics on cc:
1 girls panties (AAFitz's or anyone's)
2 mods
3 bans
4 D*&(ng M(*&tard
5 Mocking people (for definition of mocking, please post and see if you get banned, then you'll find out, sucker)
6 FW

if these topics are forbidden, then why are there so many of them?

[Neoteny]

Because they are awesome.

[cena-rules]

Another show of the mods fucking up. Maybe its time to get people that will help the site instead of just sitting back doing f*ck all but feel important

[xelabale]

List of forbidden topics on cc:
1 girls panties (AAFitz's or anyone's)
2 mods
3 bans
4 D*&(ng M(*&tard
5 Mocking people (for definition of mocking, please post and see if you get banned, then you'll find out, sucker)
6 FW

if these topics are forbidden, then why are there so many of them?

BK tells us he got a 30 day ban for using number 1
Threads are quick to be locked or moved to suggs and bugs that are about 2, 3, 4 and 6. Number 5, we're working on.

Remember to post in at least 3 of the other sort, or you get it.

[notyou2]

Concerning #1, there is a thread with that topic that at least one mod has posted in.

[xelabale]

Concerning #1, there is a thread with that topic that at least one mod has posted in.

This can't be true, it is bannable. There's no way a mod would post in a thread containing that, since that is what BK got banned for - they would simply lock the thread and hand out the appropriate punishment. Can you quote or link that, otherwise I don't believe it.

[notyou2]

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=95469

[xelabale]

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=95469

You're right, I apologise for doubting you.
But then....?
Why did....?
Why wasn't....?
If it's a 30 day ban for 1 person, shouldn't it...?
The mod supported the flame so is ok to...?

Oh I'm so confused. Somebody help, please. Andy, could you explain? /waves enticing banana whilst feeling slightly dirty about using such tactics/