Moderator: Community Team
AndyDufresne wrote:Me too, in regards to Moz.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
AndyDufresne wrote:Dcowboys, few posts...latched right on to Xenhu bandwagon on page 5.
Lt. Mustard, just not very active.
Kernal_K, general inactivity, playing the noob card.
Trestain, quick votes on page 8. [/list][/size]
Those are the few odd balls that pop out, in regards to activity or lack there of.
autoload wrote:Hey, it looks like I finally fast posted someone!
Looking at the list, trestain is usually good about posting. Let us pressure him into talking. Perhaps the volume of posts is overwhelming him at the moment, but I think we need to hear from a currently quiet, yet otherwise solid poster.
Vote: trestain
Now before some of you guys freak out, let me explain that this vote does not danger him in any way and I will be taking it off as soon as he posts something. This is a common tactic in Mafia to get someone to talk. Almost an etiquette of sorts.
autoload wrote:Yes, I worked today. I have never been a particularly prolific poster in mafia. I prefer quality over quantity. But I also understand that less than 5 posts is not good no matter what the quality. I am curious as to how many posts by the people not on that list were spam or non helpful posts... I mean, I see some players not on that list that I feel did not contribute as much to this game as I have. Just saying that we shouldn't weigh total post numbers as heavily as you suggest.
reverend_kyle wrote:I disagree with that vote though, for the record, I think before we start voting people for inactivity we should wait a few rounds.
Also. I hate coming back and having 7 votes on me, but thats just me.
Nyvek wrote:AK, can we get a mod ruling on whether or not Regular Cops are given roles from their investigations?
Kernal_Kronic wrote:P.S. Why did RB suspect Mach of being mafia?
AK_iceman wrote:Nyvek wrote:AK, can we get a mod ruling on whether or not Regular Cops are given roles from their investigations?
Nope.
Puff wrote:I personally don't know who's theory to go with so I'm going to say.
vote: No Lynch
Puff wrote:I am starting to agree with everyone else on the Xen subject.
However my vote stands until I hear more from him
Puff wrote:Alright I'm convinced
Unvote No lynch
Vote XenHu
Puff wrote:vgmmaster wrote:This is what I'm thinking at the moment.
Mach's accusation that there is no SK makes sense. Going off of the win condition, Mach would be correct as it says that we are to kill all mafia members and there is no reference to an SK. However, being the experienced player that Mach is, he could be manipulating this seemingly simple info to his advantage.
Also, I want to bring this to attention as well.Machiavelli wrote:The game cant end with a serial killer left.
You are 100% wrong in this. I will tell you why. I was the SK in a game before (different game then the one I mentioned already). Now, in that game, three people remained, the SK, a mason, and the final mafia member. The SK and the mason lynched the final mafia member and the SK killed the mason which resulted in the SK's win.
I'd give you a link to the game, but the forum is private, so linking to it here will not do us any good. But the SK can win mafia games. It's just difficult for them to do so.
Another thing to mention. Red Bull has mentioned that he knows Fircoal is innocent. Either A) he believes that, but doesn't really know for sure, B) he's a cop of some sort, C) they're both mafia, or D) they're both masons.
Personally, lynching either Red Bull or Fircoal may be the best option. If Red Bull is a mason or a sane cop, it clears Fircoal's name. If he's mafia, then Fircoal is mafia.
That is a very good point but if it goes wrong and Red Bull is a cop then we wasted another day.
So the safest way to prove your theory is to Vote Fircoal
This way if we're wrong we didn't lynch a cop (hopefully)
Puff wrote:red bull wrote:because i really think he is a help to the town
What has he said for you to think this. please find the quote.
Puff wrote:sully800 wrote:I agree with the general consensus that red bull is acting very strange, but I do not think it is worth a lynch since he's a potential cop. The town lynching their own cops and doctors is the quickest way for this game to end in the hands of the mafia.red bull wrote:ok i cant really back anything up im sorry i cant. its just what i think and how he is acting,{fircoal} i still have no clues who is in the mafia i have some thoughts as to who is in it but i think i will not get a clear view untill the next day. but right now it does not look like i will make itbut i do know that the pro town needs to keep fircoal alive
To me that really sounds like a cop trying to hint at who the investigated without actually saying "I'm the cop". Of course it could be a better mafia doing an impersonation of a noobish cop, but I think its almost too good of an act for that.
Also the only thing he has been saying is he thinks fircoal is innocent. He is not talking about any other members which would make sense if he was a cop because he only had one night to investigate. Also, in the above quote he said he has no clues as to who is in the mafia and won't get a clear view until the next day....once again alluding to being the cop.
There is no way its worth the risk to kill a potential cop. If anything we could lynch fircoal to try and prove that red bull is innocent but I'm not entirely sold on that plan either.
The only way to prove red bull is a cop is to lynch fircoal.
I'm sorry if your your town fircoal but not sorry if your mafia either way this is for the good of all.
My vote stands
Puff wrote:wicked wrote:but rojo hasn't even claimed cop. WE are the ones putting that label on him. lynching fircola doesn't automatically prove rojo is a cop if fircola turns out to be townie.
I think the whole situation is weird, but I'm not ready to lynch on it right now.
It does prove something Lynching Fircoal will tell us if red bull is either:
cop
mafia
mason
why else would he defend fircoal
Users browsing this forum: No registered users