Conquer Club

Logic dictates that there is a God!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Does God exist?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Snorri1234 on Fri May 21, 2010 5:14 pm

jay_a2j wrote:I can see where you would believe that a person who is told long enough that X god is real, would believe it. As all faiths can attest to. However, there is a difference, one that can not be explained. It starts by simple faith....as this faith grows you will come to a place where Hebrews 11:1 sets in. It is Gods hand in my life, that can not be mistaken for coincidence, that validates my faith. There is a relationship between the believer and his/her God. It is not simply a belief but a personal relationship with the living God! And as I have walked this walk, God has made himself known to me. To the point where it is no longer a question of believing in Him, but knowing Him. No one can give this relationship to another but must be sought out individually.


I don't think Fitz is talking so much about faith in God but more faith in the particular bible-version you believe in. More to the point: I don't doubt you really believe in God who totally loves you and all that and that it's very important to you, but what about all the stuff in the bible that isn't so much about God loving you and more about what you should and should not do?

Do you feel the same way about all the stuff in the bible as you do about God's existence? That is: do you know that everything in it is 100% fact completely and utterly? Or is it that you believe it all to be true but can concede that some of it might be false? (talking about the stories and stuff and not about the whole "only through me can you reach heaven".)
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby MeDeFe on Fri May 21, 2010 5:23 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:There IS proof for God. There is proof of God that cannot be disputed by science. It cannot be confirmed by science, but it cannot be disputed.

I will give voice to what many of us are probably thinking: Like what? This is a very bold claim, but can you give us an example?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby john9blue on Fri May 21, 2010 5:39 pm

Jay I have a question. Do you know that your political beliefs are true, or do you just believe that they are true?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
Captain john9blue
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:18 pm
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby jay_a2j on Fri May 21, 2010 7:35 pm

Snorri1234 wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I can see where you would believe that a person who is told long enough that X god is real, would believe it. As all faiths can attest to. However, there is a difference, one that can not be explained. It starts by simple faith....as this faith grows you will come to a place where Hebrews 11:1 sets in. It is Gods hand in my life, that can not be mistaken for coincidence, that validates my faith. There is a relationship between the believer and his/her God. It is not simply a belief but a personal relationship with the living God! And as I have walked this walk, God has made himself known to me. To the point where it is no longer a question of believing in Him, but knowing Him. No one can give this relationship to another but must be sought out individually.


I don't think Fitz is talking so much about faith in God but more faith in the particular bible-version you believe in. More to the point: I don't doubt you really believe in God who totally loves you and all that and that it's very important to you, but what about all the stuff in the bible that isn't so much about God loving you and more about what you should and should not do?

Do you feel the same way about all the stuff in the bible as you do about God's existence? That is: do you know that everything in it is 100% fact completely and utterly? Or is it that you believe it all to be true but can concede that some of it might be false? (talking about the stories and stuff and not about the whole "only through me can you reach heaven".)



"If you love me, you will keep my commandments" There is a reason we should "do"and "not do" certain things. Above all else, we are to be "like Him". And this is a journey. But obedience to God, who knows the beginning from the end is our goal. The work that begins in us won't be complete (in all likelihood) in our lifetime.

The different interpretation of scripture can be incorrect, baring an interpretation by the Spirit. Because man is involved. The non-salvation subjects in scripture are not vital to have a relationship with Him. Through that relationship, you will learn more and more about God.


john9blue wrote:Jay I have a question. Do you know that your political beliefs are true, or do you just believe that they are true?


My political views have changed over time. I come upon them via the eyes of man but must continue to practice looking at current events through "the third eye of scripture". I do find it hard to understand how a Christian can be liberal. But my views on politics are just that, my views.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby AAFitz on Fri May 21, 2010 7:56 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
AAFitz wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:
If every single person on earth told me that there was no God, I'd be the only one blessed with knowing that there is. It wouldn't change my beliefs one iota.


Why?



Because I know He exists!



Now, yes. As you say, the debate is over and you have stopped learning and thinking. You have believed what you were told when you were young, and refuse to accept other possibilities. There is actually a psychological name for the phenomena where people will do the same things over and over even if they are wrong, and even know they are wrong only to protect their perception of reality, which some fear they not handle any change in. In the end, many realize they were wrong, but it is the fear of the change that prevents them from questioning their belief. To some degree, all people do it on some level. Some just take it to extremes and ignore anything they don't believe in at the time, and some simply hold onto everything they were told when young, and usually, because they came to believe so strongly in what they were told, and made it such a part of their personality, that the idea of questioning it, would question their entire life, and many simply cannot take that chance.

However, had you been told very early that your God was different, and everyone around you believed the same, you would now believe that, and you would never listen to anyone who ever told you different. You simply hold onto childhood beliefs very strongly and never question them no matter what, and no matter how much evidence to the contrary. Many people are like that. It is a much easier way to live. Believing in something and never accepting that it may be incorrect no matter what means you never have to question it, and you therefore never have to defend it. You can say you believe, no matter what as you just did, and you never have to accept that you were wrong. Ever.

The only problem with that is that it is not real belief, because you simply ignore any possibility that you are wrong, and since many people in the past and even currently have proven that they can believe things that turn out to be wrong, there is an insurmountable amount of evidence that shows that it is very probable that these beliefs are just psychological symptoms of the human condition, and not in any way evidence of an actual creator. As always, its impossible to prove there is no creator, but it is certainly possible to prove that people have, and very well could be just believing in irrational things that are not true, because there are countless examples and proof of it.



I can see where you would believe that a person who is told long enough that X god is real, would believe it. As all faiths can attest to. However, there is a difference, one that can not be explained. It starts by simple faith....as this faith grows you will come to a place where Hebrews 11:1 sets in. It is Gods hand in my life, that can not be mistaken for coincidence, that validates my faith. There is a relationship between the believer and his/her God. It is not simply a belief but a personal relationship with the living God! And as I have walked this walk, God has made himself known to me. To the point where it is no longer a question of believing in Him, but knowing Him. No one can give this relationship to another but must be sought out individually.


Well, you ignore all I said, but not unexpectedly. You also speak as though you speak to someone who has perhaps never believed in God, or perhaps even still does. My point, is that everything you just said, is in your mind, and it is the same psychological process as belief that exists when the belief is in something untrue. Belief is nothing more than belief. It is so easy to come to believe anything, that the human belief in anything becomes a subjective thing. People are prone to believe in things that are not real. We have amazing imaginations and intelligence, but are very prone to believing in things that simply are not true. You have set up a little explanation for the deepness and willingness to believe, and feel that because it is God that you believe in that it is justified. But it is no more sacred than someone who believes in aliens, or martians, or that the world is flat. Those people believe to the core of their being. They cannot be swayed. Some of them may even be right, but its completely irrelevant. The important thing is, and the reason why saying that logic dictates there is a God is simply ignoring all of human history, and the whole of human psychology.

Logic simply does not dictate there is a God, any more than it dictates that there is not one. One can logically argue it either way, and it always comes down to faith, and subjective faith at that. The only way it can ever even be proven is if there is a God, which makes believing simply the safer and easier thing to do, especially for those who were taught early, and spent year after year after year devoted to that belief.

In any case, I do not in any way question your faith, or even disrespect it in any way. I simply disagree with any statement about logic, and the reason why, is the exact reason you post why you believe. It describes the psychological process, which by its very nature, can never be trusted on its own, as throughout history, that exact process that you rejoice in and exclaim is your salvation, has been used for eons for beliefs that simply have not been true, and so many times as to call into question any belief whatsoever, especially any without tangible proof.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
Sergeant 1st Class AAFitz
 
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Snorri1234 on Fri May 21, 2010 8:01 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:I can see where you would believe that a person who is told long enough that X god is real, would believe it. As all faiths can attest to. However, there is a difference, one that can not be explained. It starts by simple faith....as this faith grows you will come to a place where Hebrews 11:1 sets in. It is Gods hand in my life, that can not be mistaken for coincidence, that validates my faith. There is a relationship between the believer and his/her God. It is not simply a belief but a personal relationship with the living God! And as I have walked this walk, God has made himself known to me. To the point where it is no longer a question of believing in Him, but knowing Him. No one can give this relationship to another but must be sought out individually.


I don't think Fitz is talking so much about faith in God but more faith in the particular bible-version you believe in. More to the point: I don't doubt you really believe in God who totally loves you and all that and that it's very important to you, but what about all the stuff in the bible that isn't so much about God loving you and more about what you should and should not do?

Do you feel the same way about all the stuff in the bible as you do about God's existence? That is: do you know that everything in it is 100% fact completely and utterly? Or is it that you believe it all to be true but can concede that some of it might be false? (talking about the stories and stuff and not about the whole "only through me can you reach heaven".)



"If you love me, you will keep my commandments" There is a reason we should "do"and "not do" certain things. Above all else, we are to be "like Him". And this is a journey. But obedience to God, who knows the beginning from the end is our goal. The work that begins in us won't be complete (in all likelihood) in our lifetime.

The different interpretation of scripture can be incorrect, baring an interpretation by the Spirit. Because man is involved. The non-salvation subjects in scripture are not vital to have a relationship with Him. Through that relationship, you will learn more and more about God.



So uhm...seeing as I don't speak religialese.. you concede that parts of the bible could be wrong, right? Or at least that certain stuff can be wrongly interpreted by you or others?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby jay_a2j on Sun May 23, 2010 6:24 am

AAFitz wrote: Belief is nothing more than belief.



Exactly, and that is why I don't "believe" in God because I know Him.



AAFitz wrote:But it is no more sacred than someone who believes in aliens, or martians, or that the world is flat. Those people believe to the core of their being.



Again, the difference between believing and knowing.



AAFitz wrote:Logic simply does not dictate there is a God, any more than it dictates that there is not one. One can logically argue it either way, and it always comes down to faith, and subjective faith at that. The only way it can ever even be proven is if there is a God, which makes believing simply the safer and easier thing to do, especially for those who were taught early, and spent year after year after year devoted to that belief.

In any case, I do not in any way question your faith, or even disrespect it in any way. I simply disagree with any statement about logic, and the reason why, is the exact reason you post why you believe. It describes the psychological process, which by its very nature, can never be trusted on its own, as throughout history, that exact process that you rejoice in and exclaim is your salvation, has been used for eons for beliefs that simply have not been true, and so many times as to call into question any belief whatsoever, especially any without tangible proof.



Because logically, you can come to no other conclusion. God MUST exist. (As addressed at the beginning of thread) This is kind of strayed from the topic of God's existence and my personal faith.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun May 23, 2010 7:38 am

comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.
The real truth is that there is much in this world beyond what can be physically proven.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby icedagger on Sun May 23, 2010 10:19 am

PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.


No it isn't. He said a gut feeling isn't evidence for god. He didn't say the gut feeling doesn't exist.
User avatar
Major icedagger
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:10 am

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby joecoolfrog on Sun May 23, 2010 10:54 am

PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.
The real truth is that there is much in this world beyond what can be physically proven.


No that is not what he is saying :D
Yes there are many things that cannot at this time be explained, that does not by default mean there is a God at work . There is no evidence for a God , faith is not evidence, hope is not evidence, a whooshy feeling inside is not evidence.
Last edited by joecoolfrog on Sun May 23, 2010 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Colonel joecoolfrog
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: London ponds

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun May 23, 2010 11:14 am

icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.


No it isn't. He said a gut feeling isn't evidence for god. He didn't say the gut feeling doesn't exist.

No, he said it is not evidence. Either it IS evidence, evidence for anger, love, etc or it is not. You cannot have it both ways.

This is very much like a court of law. In law, there is proof "beyond a shadow of a doubt" that equates roughly to proof required by science. In law, it must be percieved "irrefutable. In science, it must be testable, irrefutable. In both cases, there can be error, but the standard is intentionally set very, very high.

However, the requirement for civil lawsuits is much less.. a "preponderance of evidence" is wording in some states. The chances of that being wrong are higher, but the standard is still very high. This is roughly equivalent to evidence required for a scientific theory to be valid, etc.

Then you have a nother standard. Individuals, each make their own judgements. They make judgements on things not accepted by law, but sometimes very much more accurate. They make judgements based on knowing the person, experience, etc. They can serve as "caracter witnesses", but it is not enough for any kind of conviction. Generally not enough to refute other types of evidence, either. HOWEVER, this is the stuff of investigation and belief. It is these types of things that spurr people to go back and spend the time to look at the evidence of already convicted individuals, because people "know", in thier hearts, a person is innocent. It is also the sort of thing that moves great scientists to move out and spend years of their lives investigating things that the rest of science considers "wrong". It is not certain, no. But, guess what? This is the very front of some of our greatest discoveries. This is how many innocent people are set free and it is how science is periodically "rocked" or even "turned on its head".

I don't suggest that my saying "I see the evidence, but I cannot show it to you" is enough to get you to change your worldview or start attending church. I DO say that it is enough to warrant more respect than claims that
"I don't care what you say, your beliefs are just as silly as someone who wants to claim pink unicorns and flying teapots are real".

Flying teapots don't exist. There is no evidence for them, there is plenty of evidence to disprove them. Same with pink unicorns. Even mythology doesn't really and truly accept either flying teapots or pink unicorns (in myth, they are white or sometimes grey, not pink). Sure, you can invent them. So what? I can write plenty of fiction. I have and do. But it is not real.

God, however IS real. God is real not just because someone told me so, not just because I wish it to be, God is real because God has proven his presence to me in very deep and fundamental ways. He proves himself to me in ways even deeper than the love I know for my sons.

Yet, just like I cannot prove my love for my sons, not really, not to someone who wishes to deny it, I cannot prove God to someone who wishes not to look beyond what is proven in front of their face, for them to touch and feel.

The problem comes only when you assert that your narrowness of thinking is actually a greater thinking. This is a problem because it firmly cuts yourself off from most people who do believe in God. It puts your very logic in question. If you work so heavily to deny the existance of God, they of course all your data, everything else you assert is subject to question.

Right now, science is in crisis. Whether you wish to admit it or not, millions of people are turning their backs on science because so many scientists like yourself insist that science= no God. They turn their backs on proof because people who cannot even begin to TRY to understand their deepest, most fundamental beliefs simply do not deserve respect. Respect is not given, it must be earned. Someone who tells me that my deepest held believes are nothing more than belief in a flying teapot.. well, I can look beyond it, to a point but most people simply won't.

THAT is where my anger comes from. My anger comes (and yes, I direct it in the other direction as well!) becuase your arrogance and narrowmindedness are driving a wedge into my country. My anger comes because too many people like you have been allowed to dominate science forums and as a result, my own son attends a school where 3 out 4 teachers attend a church that firmly believes in young earth creationism. My anger comes because person after person in my town has so little trust in science that they are willing to ignore data for global warming, and are perfectly happy to have carcinogen spewing plants in our town, becuase they provide a few jobs.

My anger comes because while you are not yet in the science field, you will be and if you enter taking such strong biases with you, you will be heavily contributing to the problems of science.. the problems of people standing on their lofty pillars looking down on "the masses" and claiming superiority. Well, guess what! Those "idiot masses" well outnumber you. So, if you want YOUR programs passed, if you don't want funding for YOUR research cut to save on taxes, then you need to take it upon yourself to get down off those perches and much with the "dirty masses".

I am angry because I have seen this happening for 40 years. I am angry because one reason I am not currently employed is because too many in this state think fisheries is about fish farms that drop full-sized. fishable trout, trout that are not even native, into our streams. I am angry because that lack of understanding is why there were no laws to require my neighbor to design appropriate drainage when he built a house next to mine. I am angry because I bought a house, specifically knowing that drainage was well done, that this house would last.. only to have it all erased by my neighbor's refusal to spend $200 (literally!) when building his house. I am angry because I now have a garage and basement that leak every time it rains, and unlike the borough manager designated with enforcing the rules, I KNOW just what damage that is causing.

I am angry because if scientists don't start working together with EVERYONE, including those they consider religious idiots, and don't start giving them ALL respect, we are ALL doomed.. and I don't exaggerate in the least.

You think this gulf oil spill is an anomoly? It isn't. We spend all this time, energy and worry about terrorists. Terrorist that do present a real threat, yes, but the REAL truth, to those who fully understand the situation, the REAL TRUTH is that for all the damage from 9-11, this one BP accident is going to cause us far more trouble than 10 9-11s ever could. The 9-11 attacks killed people. It was horrific. The BP incident will ruin the ecology of several entire regions. Make no mistake, it has the potential to severely harm the US economy. That one act has that potential.

HOW did we allow that to happen? Ignorance. Pure and simple ignorance, combined with a little greed. And scientists who think they are superior to everyone else.. they are the real and true cause of it all.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Lionz on Sun May 23, 2010 11:17 am

Joe,

Can you define evidence if you claim there's no evidence for Him? See a page 334 second post? Care to respond?
Last edited by Lionz on Sun May 23, 2010 11:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
General Lionz
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun May 23, 2010 11:22 am

Neoteny wrote:Is it ever ok to shoot someone? Why is everything that has to do with god a dichotomy? Why is there never a middle ground?

The dichotomy is a dichotomy in human understanding, not necessarily in God. That is the difference. And it gets back to the point that we do have free will. Never mistake what people believe to be true about God with what IS true about God. (and yes, that is true for myself... I might well be wrong about many things. That is why I believe in discussion and not setting out laws declaring unbelievers illegal heretics that ought to burned at the stake).
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby icedagger on Sun May 23, 2010 12:08 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.


No it isn't. He said a gut feeling isn't evidence for god. He didn't say the gut feeling doesn't exist.

No, he said it is not evidence. Either it IS evidence, evidence for anger, love, etc or it is not. You cannot have it both ways.


I genuinely don't understand what you're saying here. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument as far as I can see is "We have no scientific evidence for anger, love, etc therefore a gut feeling is evidence for god". If we accept the premise that anger and love cannot be scientifically proven, it would be reasonable to say a gut feeling also cannot be proven. No one is disputing you have a gut feeling, though. What's being disputed is whether a gut feeling can be evidence for god. Your argument re anger, love etc seems completely irrelevent to this?

I take it you're talking to someone else in the rest of your post.
User avatar
Major icedagger
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:10 am

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun May 23, 2010 12:15 pm

icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.


No it isn't. He said a gut feeling isn't evidence for god. He didn't say the gut feeling doesn't exist.

No, he said it is not evidence. Either it IS evidence, evidence for anger, love, etc or it is not. You cannot have it both ways.


I genuinely don't understand what you're saying here. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument as far as I can see is "We have no scientific evidence for anger, love, etc therefore a gut feeling is evidence for god". If we accept the premise that anger and love cannot be scientifically proven, it would be reasonable to say a gut feeling also cannot be proven. No one is disputing you have a gut feeling, though. What's being disputed is whether a gut feeling can be evidence for god. Your argument re anger, love etc seems completely irrelevent to this?

I take it you're talking to someone else in the rest of your post.

I am saying that love is generally acknowledged to exist without true scientifically proveable evidence. Many, many things are accepted without absolute scientific evidence.

The standards required of non-believers to even acknowledge that there could be God is much, much higher than for any other type of subject.

Again, this is not about proving that God exists or does not. I acknowledge fully that I cannot prove to you God exists. The problem is the declaration that believe in God is not just "not logical", but is actually "illogical", and, particularly the very insulting comment that believing in God makes as much sense as believing in flying teapots.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby icedagger on Sun May 23, 2010 1:12 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:
icedagger wrote:I genuinely don't understand what you're saying here. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument as far as I can see is "We have no scientific evidence for anger, love, etc therefore a gut feeling is evidence for god". If we accept the premise that anger and love cannot be scientifically proven, it would be reasonable to say a gut feeling also cannot be proven. No one is disputing you have a gut feeling, though. What's being disputed is whether a gut feeling can be evidence for god. Your argument re anger, love etc seems completely irrelevent to this?

I take it you're talking to someone else in the rest of your post.

I am saying that love is generally acknowledged to exist without true scientifically proveable evidence. Many, many things are accepted without absolute scientific evidence.

The standards required of non-believers to even acknowledge that there could be God is much, much higher than for any other type of subject.


Love is generally acknowledged to exist because it's something a large number of people have experienced. Belief in god is generally acknowledged to exist because it's something a large number of people have experienced. No-one disputes either exists, as short of billions of people lying they can be observed to exist.

You seem to be conflating belief in god with god's existence, though. Many people in love genuinely believe the person they're in love with is objectively one of the most beautiful people in the world when they are not (a bad example since beauty can't really be objectively judged but I'm sure you take the point), just as those who believe in god genuinely believe their chosen god exists. Neither can be taken as scientific evidence, however, as neither can be observed to be true by a neutral bystander. The existence of love, and the existence of belief in god on the other hand, can. These are entirely different things though, there is no double standard.


PLAYER57832 wrote:Again, this is not about proving that God exists or does not. I acknowledge fully that I cannot prove to you God exists. The problem is the declaration that believe in God is not just "not logical", but is actually "illogical", and, particularly the very insulting comment that believing in God makes as much sense as believing in flying teapots.


I don't see the distinction between something that's not logical and something that's illogical to be honest.

I wouldn't claim that believing in God makes as much sense as believing in flying teapots, as I accept that believers in god think they have both evidence for god, and a reason for his/her/its existence (i.e at some level creation). For them god is more likely to exist than a flying teapot, which has neither of these. As I absolutely don't accept there is either evidence for god or a reason for its existence, however, I believe the existence of god is no more or less likely than that of the hypothetical teapot. The belief in god in religious people I can accept as making for them far more sense than them believing in a flying teapot though. I think I've confused myself at this point :P
User avatar
Major icedagger
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:10 am

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby comic boy on Sun May 23, 2010 1:14 pm

icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
comic boy wrote:A gut feeling is not evidence , desire or faith is not evidence, there is no evidence for any God.

I see, so love. anger, sadness.. none of those exist or are real?

Because that IS what you are saying.


No it isn't. He said a gut feeling isn't evidence for god. He didn't say the gut feeling doesn't exist.

No, he said it is not evidence. Either it IS evidence, evidence for anger, love, etc or it is not. You cannot have it both ways.


I genuinely don't understand what you're saying here. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument as far as I can see is "We have no scientific evidence for anger, love, etc therefore a gut feeling is evidence for god". If we accept the premise that anger and love cannot be scientifically proven, it would be reasonable to say a gut feeling also cannot be proven. No one is disputing you have a gut feeling, though. What's being disputed is whether a gut feeling can be evidence for god. Your argument re anger, love etc seems completely irrelevent to this?

I take it you're talking to someone else in the rest of your post.



When an Arsenal and West Ham fan agree then it is overwhelming proof that we are right :lol:
Im a TOFU miSfit
User avatar
Brigadier comic boy
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: London

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Utafar on Sun May 23, 2010 2:03 pm

If there is anything that any person participating in this thread should realize. It's that this is a debate that is impossible to win. Both sides refuse to believe they could be wrong and believe that the opposing side's arguments are utter poppycock. So do everyone in the world a favor and stop fighting. I personally don't believe in god, but I acknowledge the remote possibility that they might be right. I won't give people shit about their beliefs if they don't give me shit about mine. I'm sick of seeing these debate threads all around the internet over religion and which country is better and whatnot. Just do everyone a favor and SHUT THE f*ck UP already.
Sergeant 1st Class Utafar
 
Posts: 1360
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 10:10 pm
Location: A computer

Postby Lionz on Sun May 23, 2010 2:05 pm

Ice,

Can you define evidence?
User avatar
General Lionz
 
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:37 pm

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Frigidus on Sun May 23, 2010 2:36 pm

Utafar wrote:If there is anything that any person participating in this thread should realize. It's that this is a debate that is impossible to win. Both sides refuse to believe they could be wrong and believe that the opposing side's arguments are utter poppycock. So do everyone in the world a favor and stop fighting. I personally don't believe in god, but I acknowledge the remote possibility that they might be right. I won't give people shit about their beliefs if they don't give me shit about mine. I'm sick of seeing these debate threads all around the internet over religion and which country is better and whatnot. Just do everyone a favor and SHUT THE f*ck UP already.


You could say this about every thread in the forum. Some people argue for the fun of it. If you don't like it, you don't have to read it.
User avatar
Sergeant Frigidus
 
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby icedagger on Sun May 23, 2010 2:41 pm

Lionz wrote:Ice,

Can you define evidence?


Hmmm. Facts supporting a theory, which can be empirically observed?
User avatar
Major icedagger
 
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:10 am

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Baron Von PWN on Sun May 23, 2010 2:52 pm

jay_a2j wrote:First off put aside any bias that you may have...weather it be religious or anti-religious.

Now science has said, Life cannot come from non-life. Which is common sense... a rock will never reproduce since it is not living.



Hmm no. Who's to say the right combination of elements plus an electric charge won't create a life form?
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Baron Von PWN
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 10:05 pm
Location: Capital region ,Canada

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby jay_a2j on Sun May 23, 2010 3:11 pm

Baron Von PWN wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:First off put aside any bias that you may have...weather it be religious or anti-religious.

Now science has said, Life cannot come from non-life. Which is common sense... a rock will never reproduce since it is not living.



Hmm no. Who's to say the right combination of elements plus an electric charge won't create a life form?




Life can not come from non-life. Given this fact, God must exist.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby Snorri1234 on Sun May 23, 2010 3:25 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
Baron Von PWN wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:First off put aside any bias that you may have...weather it be religious or anti-religious.

Now science has said, Life cannot come from non-life. Which is common sense... a rock will never reproduce since it is not living.



Hmm no. Who's to say the right combination of elements plus an electric charge won't create a life form?




Life can not come from non-life. Given this fact, God must exist.


Repeating it over and over doesn't make it true.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Private Snorri1234
 
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.

Re: Logic dictates that there is a God!

Postby PLAYER57832 on Sun May 23, 2010 3:30 pm

icedagger wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
icedagger wrote:I genuinely don't understand what you're saying here. Correct me if I'm wrong but your argument as far as I can see is "We have no scientific evidence for anger, love, etc therefore a gut feeling is evidence for god". If we accept the premise that anger and love cannot be scientifically proven, it would be reasonable to say a gut feeling also cannot be proven. No one is disputing you have a gut feeling, though. What's being disputed is whether a gut feeling can be evidence for god. Your argument re anger, love etc seems completely irrelevent to this?

I take it you're talking to someone else in the rest of your post.

I am saying that love is generally acknowledged to exist without true scientifically proveable evidence. Many, many things are accepted without absolute scientific evidence.

The standards required of non-believers to even acknowledge that there could be God is much, much higher than for any other type of subject.


Love is generally acknowledged to exist because it's something a large number of people have experienced. Belief in god is generally acknowledged to exist because it's something a large number of people have experienced. No-one disputes either exists, as short of billions of people lying they can be observed to exist.

You seem to be conflating belief in god with god's existence, though. Many people in love genuinely believe the person they're in love with is objectively one of the most beautiful people in the world when they are not (a bad example since beauty can't really be objectively judged but I'm sure you take the point), just as those who believe in god genuinely believe their chosen god exists. Neither can be taken as scientific evidence, however, as neither can be observed to be true by a neutral bystander. The existence of love, and the existence of belief in god on the other hand, can. These are entirely different things though, there is no double standard.
I was answering comic, Neoteny and MeDeFe. When you compare it to flying teapots, t is exactly what you are doing.

You get closer than comic, etc. when you distinguish between proving that a particular person loves a particular other and believing that love, itself exists.

Belief in love is not just logical because millions of people believe it. It is logical because millions of people experience it. This is true for God, also. Your saying that God does not exist, because you have not experienced God is very much like saying love cannot exist, because you have not yet, (and perhaps never will) experience it.


PLAYER57832 wrote:Again, this is not about proving that God exists or does not. I acknowledge fully that I cannot prove to you God exists. The problem is the declaration that believe in God is not just "not logical", but is actually "illogical", and, particularly the very insulting comment that believing in God makes as much sense as believing in flying teapots.


I don't see the distinction between something that's not logical and something that's illogical to be honest.

I wouldn't claim that believing in God makes as much sense as believing in flying teapots, as I accept that believers in god think they have both evidence for god, and a reason for his/her/its existence (i.e at some level creation). For them god is more likely to exist than a flying teapot, which has neither of these. As I absolutely don't accept there is either evidence for god or a reason for its existence, however, I believe the existence of god is no more or less likely than that of the hypothetical teapot. The belief in god in religious people I can accept as making for them far more sense than them believing in a flying teapot though. I think I've confused myself at this point :P[/quote]
See, you want to have it both ways.

The tea pot example is irrelevant because it is only you attempting to compare something you do not believe to something else you do not believe. It has absolutely no relevance, at all to the real and true beliefs of millions. It is just an attempt to justify your non-belief to yourself. It in no way shows any willingness to even consider that you might be wrong.

Science is exact. You don't assert something is true when it cannot be proven, but the reverse is ALSO, equally true. You cannot, scientifically, declare that something is not there without proof. With God, you have millions who say there is proof, is evidence, but it is very personnal evidence. Sorry that doesn't meet your nice, neat definition of how you think God ought to act, but there it is. As such, a scientist may either believe in God or not believe. As long as you accept that.. fine. The problem, as I have said over and over and over is when you or anyone else asserts that belief in God is less logical than non-belief or that believing in God makes you intellectually or logically superior or anything else. You feel that way because it is your belief. If you did not feel that way, it would not be your belief. BUT, make no mistake, whether you believe in God or don't.. it IS just belief. Whichever view you hold, it is based on your "gut", on your "ideas" of how the world "ought" to operate. I might not be what your parents specifically taught you, or maybe it is. Regardless, it is a belief that you have firmly reconciled.

Still, it is belief. So is belief in God. Both are based on logic, but neither is purely logically proven or proven scientifically. Both require a measure of faith and belief.

And no, teapots... are just wrong. There is enough evidence to show they are not true. Furthermore, not one person here using that analysis truly believes. You use it, but all you illustrate is your unbelief. You prove nothing about those who do believe. Nothing at all!
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users