jefjef wrote:Phatscotty wrote:jefjef wrote:Phatscotty wrote:pimpdave wrote:Shut the fuck up Titanic, where were you pussy Limeys when we needed your help to end slavery during our Civil War? You just sat on the sidelines waiting to see who would win. If you assholes had stopped trading with the South, hundreds of thousands of American lives could have been spared. And even worse, you almost openly sided with the goddamn slave drivers! So don't go playing that high horse crap.
Spare us your sanctimonious blather. You really are just as bad as Phatscotty. You're the British Phatscotty. So goddamn arrogant and stupid. You have pretty much zero credibility.
Want to see stupid? Read the underlined.
Actually and factually pimpdaves statement is very accurate. England was a major weapons and ship supplier to both the confederacy AND union. They played both sides of the fence.
Ever hear of Enfield? Thousands upon thousands were on our battlefields. English artillery was on our battlefields. English swords were on our battlefields. Some confederate commerce raiders were built in England and crewed by Europeans.
Now that I publicly agreed with pimp on something I must go hang myself.
Good bye cruel world...
I agreed with him also, as crude as his verbiage was. He twisted this and that, but yet overall it was absolutely true, which is why, while I always disagree with Player, it was very odd for Pimpdave to call me out in relation to players statement, under these stated circumstances. Pimpdave is officially a hater.
One thing he did misinterpret, was that it was in Britain's interest (at least governmentally) to divide America. @ the statement about "sitting on their ass waiting to see who would win"
Yes they by no way sat out of it. They played it safe so they could appear to be friends of the victors. But yes it would not have broken their hearts to have a divided weaker America. It's what they wanted.
He also leaned into the myth that the civil war was "to end slavery during our civil war"...he was kinda overlapping the realities of 1861-1863/pre emancipation proclamation Britain and projecting that onto 1863-65/post emancipation proclamation Britain.
As usual, he has the external facts correct, but the misinterpretation has been constant no matter the issue