Khiva wrote:Or you have the same unknown then, was RainbowEater your third dwarf or the first in a second set of dwarves?
The third
Moderator: Community Team
Khiva wrote:Or you have the same unknown then, was RainbowEater your third dwarf or the first in a second set of dwarves?
cena-rules wrote:vote edocsil
I highly doubt spiesr is a mason with more than one group and as I have him in my mason group, you are pulling a bluff i believe
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
It says I can talk to everyone, it doesn't give a list of names...edocsil wrote:Can you talk to absolutely everyone or are there a fer missing guys?
spiesr wrote:It says I can talk to everyone, it doesn't give a list of names...edocsil wrote:Can you talk to absolutely everyone or are there a fer missing guys?
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:I assume nothing seeing you have been unwilling to talk to me through pm at all, but maybe someone else has managed to converse with you.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
duday53 wrote:edocsil wrote:I assume nothing seeing you have been unwilling to talk to me through pm at all, but maybe someone else has managed to converse with you.
I pm'ed him asking how he fit into my mason group and what his role was but he wouldn't tell me. He never really asked me what my role was.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
MeDeFe wrote:duday53 wrote:edocsil wrote:I assume nothing seeing you have been unwilling to talk to me through pm at all, but maybe someone else has managed to converse with you.
I pm'ed him asking how he fit into my mason group and what his role was but he wouldn't tell me. He never really asked me what my role was.
He probably doesn't fit into your mason group at all from the description, while he may pm anyone in the game and receive pms from others, he's only masoned with one person. So if wercool didn't tell you spiesr's role you're probably not masoned with him.
lalaland wrote:This is what I love about Spamalot... you click on a title to a thread, and you have no idea what you'll find inside...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Not necessarily, if they claim then they are a giant target for the scum.edocsil wrote:Pardon my ignorance every game that i have joined has died before it really got anywhere. Is it common for cops to claim later then others, I just assumed that such a power role would claim early.
Yeah, my pm doesn't mention you at all...edocsil wrote:I would say you were correct, except my role explicitly said I was masoned with him, naxus and one other active member, who hasn't claim yet and so who will remain anonymous. Idk if others were the same way. Either way it is really a moot point isn't it? Could have been a typo of wercool's, or maybe he just meant to say that we could talk, and were not necessarily on the same side. Who knows.
spiesr wrote:Yeah, my pm doesn't mention you at all...edocsil wrote:I would say you were correct, except my role explicitly said I was masoned with him, naxus and one other active member, who hasn't claim yet and so who will remain anonymous. Idk if others were the same way. Either way it is really a moot point isn't it? Could have been a typo of wercool's, or maybe he just meant to say that we could talk, and were not necessarily on the same side. Who knows.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users