Moderator: Community Team
b.k. barunt wrote:Then you must be a pseudoatheist. If you were a real atheist Dan Brown would make your nipples hard.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
silvanricky wrote:They sure are secure in their skepticism
jimboston wrote:My opinion of either god or God does not match any of your options.
Yes... there is a difference between a god and God.
saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
Falkomagno wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
So of course, you chose the option "God is just the personification of stupid people trying desperately to justify existance."
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Falkomagno wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
So of course, you chose the option "God is just the personification of stupid people trying desperately to justify existance."
I chose not to participate for reasons stated above. I feel assured of the logic of non-theism and don't need to provoke incendiary threads with theists to assuage subconscious doubts.
JJM wrote:I don't know how to spell check and why is it that all you easterners think of North Dakotians as idiots
saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
King Doctor wrote:silvanricky wrote:They sure are secure in their skepticism
Next time somebody makes a thread ranting and raving about 'teh liberuls and teh commies!!' I will be sure to note how secure they are in their wingnut rightist views.
Falkomagno wrote:jimboston wrote:My opinion of either god or God does not match any of your options.
Yes... there is a difference between a god and God.
One of the options should be nearly to every believes for sure. Try harder.
saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
THORNHEART wrote:"God will be there to judge each according to his deeds when we die and finally have to face him."
THORNHEART wrote:"God will be there to judge each according to his deeds when we die and finally have to face him."
nietzsche wrote:Falkomagno, I do have a problem of ants in my desk, and when i see your avy I hit my display.
saxitoxin wrote:Obviously the notion of The God is a false one created by the ruling elite to control the working classes.
THAT SAID, people who proactively trumpet this fact just to get a rise out of theists are not self-assured of their own atheism and non-belief. It is a psychological truism that these people are seeking affirmation of their non-belief in the form of an irrational argument they hope to be peddled by theists.
Only a true, logically confirmed atheist would let sleeping dogs lay. The person who pokes the dog with a stick is confused and befuddled on questions of life and existence. This is also, often, symptomatic of suppressed suicidal ideation.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee