Moderator: Community Team
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:There are several people on this vessel that have a history of being instigators and evilly aligned characters a majority of the time. I also hate "random.org" votes...
So I withhold my vote until more people talk, but I'd like to say that my eyes are on those with previous evil characters.
XenHu wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:There are several people on this vessel that have a history of being instigators and evilly aligned characters a majority of the time. I also hate "random.org" votes...
So I withhold my vote until more people talk, but I'd like to say that my eyes are on those with previous evil characters.
Why? Past is past.. People who were evil in other games could be innocent and vice-versa.
FOS:AD
BTW, I'll be busy the rest of the night.. RL problems..
-X
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
wicked wrote:When I first started playing, I had a hard time forgetting who was who in a previous game. Sure, keep any eye on how people play, but don't let that cloud your judgment.
spinwizard wrote:FOS-Minesk
4 voteing by random org, it shows that he may be a wild cannon and cause problems to people trying 2 figure it out in the real way (reading players)
B. So far, there is so little evidence that a random vote is just as good as any other vote. Right now, we don't know if there are a few mafia, or if there's only one. Since there's so little evidence right now, a random vote has just as much success rate of picking off a mafia then an "informed" vote.
Like wicked said, the first day is a bunch of talk and a random vote. The talking that does get done is all hearsay and paranoia.
So you can continue to believe that a day one random.org vote is dumb, or you can use your head and realize that it's all a game of probability on day one.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users