poptartpsycho18 wrote:AgentSmith88 wrote:Pink had 6 armies left, my target had 240.  I was getting sick of waiting around for either green or red to win the game, as my target had the most troops.  Honestly, I did it for 2 reasons (accepting the fact I was not going to win) 1. I read the rules and saw a 3 player game would be played if I eliminated the target.  It didn't happen that way and I understand and accept why. 2. To move the tournament along and just finish the game.  I hate that map and was getting sick of taking turns in a game I saw no way of winning.  You can look at my game history and find games with 200+ rounds - I very rarely suicide.  This was a rare case where I saw no point in dragging the game out (especially when its the only game holding up a tourney).
I understand--Even though I don't like it, I even said in the game chat that I wish it had happened sooner since the game was really dragging on.  That's why I put the penalty of using your immunity rather than making another game that would delay the next round.  This way you got a punishment of sorts and we're moving on.
 
Well, I don't feel like I should be "punished".  It clearly states in the first post what happens if someone kills the wrong opponent.  I thought it was sound strategy on my part given the situation.  Nephilim clearly didn't like it, but I don't think he realized we would have gotten to play another game and he was clearly in last place.
I understand wanting to move on with the tournament so I get not wanting to wait for another 3-player game to finish, especially when all 3 are through to the next round anyway. I would like another shot at keeping my immunity, but I get the decision.  Obviously losing the game was not my intention going in, but I don't feel like I should be punished for reading the rules carefully and taking advantage of the situation.