Quentin Tarantino Mafia Night 3 (Mafia Win!)

[aage]

I did not think of Violets comment as a scumtell.
No scum would show their urge for a nightkill like that. I thought of it more as somebody realizing how long a Day1 can take.

Of course, when she refused to claim, she had to be lynched, but I still think she was pressurized too quickly and too systematically.

So, again, what's your point?

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Vote aage

At first you were dead set against mandy, and once ga7 FOS'd you (which wasn't a very compelling FoS), you've completely sided with them in their accusation of karel. Trying to draw attention from yourself?

-TG

[aage]

Mandy is not posting, Karel is. Need I say more...? Also, fixing on 1 person isn't a good scum find strategy...

[Army of GOD]

I don't think karel is scummy...he's trying to attack those who started the bandwagon on a cop, I guess. Honestly there wasn't anything wrong with the Violet lynch (she pretty much held up a sign that said "IM SCUM LYNCH ME PLOX").

[mandalorian2298]

The logic of both karel and mandy is taking a quick turn. I especially am annoyed by Mandy, not just because of the vote on me, but because you're pretending it all to be so awfully obvious. Well, I can tell you one thing: it's not. I can't say anything about Pmc because I'm not in his team, but for my part, you're just using assumptions and false arguments to try and get me killed. That's no basis for a scumtell. If you're the mafia player you pretend to be I suggest improving the quality of your accusations and their basis. And also to stop singing songs about Fircoal. It's seriously disturbing.

I was totally ready to to rant when I saw this, but Ga7 was faster:

Lol. Improving the basis I suspect is as likely as him eating his own guts for breakfast. Gut feeling ftw
Fos Aage for a totally different reason, you're not on Pmc team? Team? Really? You're part of another team then? Or know of Pmc's team? (and I don't mean Celtics )

Other than that I'm pretty clueless and would agree to a karel lynch purely to make things move on... It's stalling too much, with little activity.

After that Aage accuses Karel on the basis of activity:

1. Why the hell would Violet say that?
The only possible reason i can think of is that she's some sort of bulletproof townie and is trying to suggest she has a night action so that scum will try to kill her, but that's really a stretch.

Seriously, this is starting to feel like a Lost episode ...

Here it is bytheway, the process of making an innocent player with innocent behaviour look like scum.
Notice the subtle way of not actually accusing yet, just leaving the options open, but make the 'town'options look like farfetched. Exactly how I'm being treated.

Go cry in a corner, I suggest. Or you could just try and do something about the game.
Also, this is not the kind of inactive behaviour you were announcing yesterday. Scum much?

and then he loses all contact with reality:

Mandy is not posting, Karel is. Need I say more...? Also, fixing on 1 person isn't a good scum find strategy...

Yes you need to say more. How am I not posting if this is my second post today. Fixing on 1 person isn't good? The whole point of voting is finding 1 person that is scum.

Seriously people, are you waiting for Aage to show up in a shirt which says "I'm scum. Ask me how?" or are you going to lynch him already.

[aage]

Sigh... Mandy, stop pulling words out of their context. Yes, this is your second post today. I already responed to your previous post, so there pretty much was no reason to do so again. Thus I mentioned this when the guy with the Caps Lock said something about it. What's wrong with that? Please, do explain.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Mandy is not posting, Karel is. Need I say more...? Also, fixing on 1 person isn't a good scum find strategy...

Unless you were to get an actual roleclaim.

If anything mandy's lack of posting would be submarining, and make him further suspicious. Karel is trying to defend himself (herself? idk sorry the name throws me off but everyone keeps referring to you as a he), so of course he is active. And yet you still decided to pursue karel instead of sticking to mandy. Yes I realize you still have your vote on mandy, but you're acting scummy enough for me to vote you.

-TG

[aage]

Apparently you've got no idea what I'm talking about. If I were to post, which I did, I would see whether I agreed with Karel or no, and explain why and ask further questions. That's what everyone's doing. Why is that suspicious in my case? I could go ahead and interrupt every discussion with "oh and mandy is acting sooo scummy" but that does not help. It kind of looks like you're saying I should have done that. Be more clear. Please.

[edocsil]

He has multiple people he thinks could be scum, so what? we all know a mandy-wagon will go nowhere, so while I think he is scum we have to look into other actions.

[mandalorian2298]

He has multiple people he thinks could be scum, so what? we all know a mandy-wagon will go nowhere, so while I think he is scum we have to look into other actions.

Harsh words, burc'ya! Why do you think me scum, might I ask?

[edocsil]

He has multiple people he thinks could be scum, so what? we all know a mandy-wagon will go nowhere, so while I think he is scum we have to look into other actions.

Harsh words, burc'ya! Why do you think me scum, might I ask?

As I have said I find your logic to be terrible, lynch happy, and otherwise unpleasant. The lynch happy part is why I think you are scum. You are running more of a witch hunt then scumhunting.

[nagerous]

He has multiple people he thinks could be scum, so what? we all know a mandy-wagon will go nowhere, so while I think he is scum we have to look into other actions.

Harsh words, burc'ya! Why do you think me scum, might I ask?

As I have said I find your logic to be terrible, lynch happy, and otherwise unpleasant. The lynch happy part is why I think you are scum. You are running more of a witch hunt then scumhunting.

Doesn't being lynch happy bring results?

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Apparently you've got no idea what I'm talking about. If I were to post, which I did, I would see whether I agreed with Karel or no, and explain why and ask further questions. That's what everyone's doing. Why is that suspicious in my case? I could go ahead and interrupt every discussion with "oh and mandy is acting sooo scummy" but that does not help. It kind of looks like you're saying I should have done that. Be more clear. Please.

Yes I know what you're talking about.

However I'm saying that you're trying to blend in with the crowd, so as to avoid suspicion. If you're convinced mandy is scum, pursue it. The only way to get anywhere is to get a REAL claim from somebody (here's looking at you mandy). You were pretty heated earlier with him, and now not so much...

Just saying...

-TG

[ga7]

You're apparently skimming and not happy people are onto Karel. Mandy claimed already. I think we will get more info from your lynch now, you seem more likely scum.

Unvote Vote Tails

[TA1LGUNN3R]

You're apparently skimming and not happy people are onto Karel. Mandy claimed already. I think we will get more info from your lynch now, you seem more likely scum.

Unvote Vote Tails

Apparently you're skimming. He just claimed the name, not the role.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

Right there.

FOS on ga7, for your support of aage (suspected scum). Same circumstance as your supposing that I'm defending karel, no?

-TG

[edocsil]

You're apparently skimming and not happy people are onto Karel. Mandy claimed already. I think we will get more info from your lynch now, you seem more likely scum.

Unvote Vote Tails

Apparently you're skimming. He just claimed the name, not the role.

This.

It bothers me Ga7 accepts it so readily too.

He has multiple people he thinks could be scum, so what? we all know a mandy-wagon will go nowhere, so while I think he is scum we have to look into other actions.

Harsh words, burc'ya! Why do you think me scum, might I ask?

As I have said I find your logic to be terrible, lynch happy, and otherwise unpleasant. The lynch happy part is why I think you are scum. You are running more of a witch hunt then scumhunting.

Doesn't being lynch happy bring results?

If by results you mean dead people, then yes lynching like he would like would bring results. I however would like dead scum.

[ga7]

Dude, he claimed VT... And I'm the one skimming

[ga7]

I don't know whether Aage is scum or not, I just find your insistance on him only focusing on Mandy fishy. Contrary to Mandy who obsesses over a single person and is otherwise not much use, I find it quite natural to try to find several suspects and try to decide who could be the best lynch.
There's several reasons why Mandy could have made that unforced claim, at least one of them not townish, but at the moment I don't find it likely to be a lie. He claimed VT before all these VTs were killed too...
The main point however is, I'm not trying to get heat off Aage, I just find you fishy for being so adamant on him getting off Karel's case.

[nagerous]

First of, FOS everyone who participated in the "has he claimed VT?" discussion for skimming.

I have a sudden need to role-claim because I kind of feel a deja vu to Sherwood and I think I know who one scum is. I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover. What do you guys think?

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

I do not fucking see this as a VT claim.


OVER THE LINE!

[edocsil]

First of, FOS everyone who participated in the "has he claimed VT?" discussion for skimming.

I have a sudden need to role-claim because I kind of feel a deja vu to Sherwood and I think I know who one scum is. I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover. What do you guys think?

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

I do not fucking see this as a VT claim.


OVER THE LINE!

I reread as well. No mention of VT. He specifically doesn't state his role. Just his name. You are not one to miss something like this Ga7.

[TA1LGUNN3R]

First of, FOS everyone who participated in the "has he claimed VT?" discussion for skimming.

I have a sudden need to role-claim because I kind of feel a deja vu to Sherwood and I think I know who one scum is. I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover. What do you guys think?

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

I do not fucking see this as a VT claim.


OVER THE LINE!

Smokey this is not 'Nam. There are rules. Smokey, my friend, you're entering a world of pain.

HAS THE WHOLE WORLD GONE CRAZY? AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT THE RULES? MARK IT ZERO!

for you nagerous.

-TG

[TA1LGUNN3R]

Sorry about off topic--

Can't resist when someone start's quoting that movie

[ga7]

Ahhh I know why I misread now, we had a discussion a few pages ago where there were posts like this:

Did we ever come to the consensus that mandy's claim was VT? Or true? Everyone got caught up in the Violet lynch, and they just forgot about his out of the blue claim. I mean really he claimed to be some sort of sibling role with pmc.

I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover.

Right there he says he has the ability to protect.

I think he was saying that he's VT right now, but he suspects that there'll be an event in the future that'll change that and he'll end up masoned up with pmc, or as a bodyguard or whatever.

Yeah, it makes no goddamn sense, but I'm new here and everyone seems to have just shrugged it off, so I'm guessing this sort of "interesting" logic isn't something exactly new for Mandy?

P.S. Mandy, this thread might be relevant to your interests(geez a thread named "MANDYYYY !!!!111!!!" isn't enough to get your attention i guess ... )

I did miss the beginning of Mandy's post after that discussion denying this though:

First of, FOS everyone who participated in the "has he claimed VT?" discussion for skimming.

I have a sudden need to role-claim because I kind of feel a deja vu to Sherwood and I think I know who one scum is. I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover. What do you guys think?

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

Anyway, it does change the point that you're right, we haven't heard a full claim from Mandy so it could be a target of suspicion, but to me it doesn't change the part that he's more likely town and really wanted to be recruited/masoned etc

[edocsil]

Ahhh I know why I misread now, we had a discussion a few pages ago where there were posts like this:

Did we ever come to the consensus that mandy's claim was VT? Or true? Everyone got caught up in the Violet lynch, and they just forgot about his out of the blue claim. I mean really he claimed to be some sort of sibling role with pmc.

I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover.

Right there he says he has the ability to protect.

I think he was saying that he's VT right now, but he suspects that there'll be an event in the future that'll change that and he'll end up masoned up with pmc, or as a bodyguard or whatever.

Yeah, it makes no goddamn sense, but I'm new here and everyone seems to have just shrugged it off, so I'm guessing this sort of "interesting" logic isn't something exactly new for Mandy?

P.S. Mandy, this thread might be relevant to your interests(geez a thread named "MANDYYYY !!!!111!!!" isn't enough to get your attention i guess ... )

I did miss the beginning of Mandy's post after that discussion denying this though:

First of, FOS everyone who participated in the "has he claimed VT?" discussion for skimming.

I have a sudden need to role-claim because I kind of feel a deja vu to Sherwood and I think I know who one scum is. I also think that, maybe as soon as Day 2 I may be forced to protect, bodyguard or (ye gods!) be his chump Lover. What do you guys think?

P.S. I plan to claim just the name, not the role itself.

Anyway, it does change the point that you're right, we haven't heard a full claim from Mandy so it could be a target of suspicion, but to me it doesn't change the part that he's more likely town and really wanted to be recruited/masoned etc

Well I am glad we cleared that up. I really do doubt that he is scum, it's just that his actions are just so odd. I would really like an explanation of his role, but I have no way of forcing it.