theherkman wrote:edocsil wrote:TL:DR
Too long: Didn't read?
Are you admitting to not reading and just skimming? You took the time to post, but not to make yourself aware of what is going on? That's some real pro-town behavior...
I am pretty sure that he put that there as a summary of his
own post. Presumably simply because he wanted to reiterate his point rather than him actually thinking anyone would find his post too long to read.
theherkman wrote:Anyway, I don't like the possibility of multiple role claims for day 1, so UNVOTE VOTE NO LYNCH At least until we get a better idea of wtf we are going to do.
While I understand your desire to not force out too many people by blind action on day 1, Voting no lynch at this point seems like an overreaction, especially since your reasoning appears to be that you want to wait and see what happens. Wanting too wait and decide isn't exactly an argument for voting to end the day without a lynch. It works as a reason for unvoting though.
VioIet wrote:Just thought of something. With a game this size, there must be:
Two different mafia’s.
Most likely a serial killer as well
A third party
Two cops
Two doctors
Some lovers
And apparently some role blockers.
I don't see how you have come to the conclusion that two full scum groups would be in this game. While the game is large enough to have some sort secondary antagonist, such as a serial killer or cult of some sort, in my opinion a full second mafia group wouldn't really fit well with the theme and whatnot that we have seen so far. Usually multiple scum factions tend to be almost an advertised part of a game featuring them. As for the various duplicate roles, in my opinion, it seems more likely that Mr.Squirrel would employ some of the lesser known, perhaps lower powered, roles than filling this game with a bunch of exact copies of powers. That being said, differing sanities of roles such as cops seems to be probable.
Commander9 wrote:I hate to say this, but herk does have a point about some (particularly sensfan).
Just because you have your argument with him doesn't mean that he can't be right about things. You shouldn't disregard his theories just because they come from him. Unless of course, that you truly believe him to be scum, then you should look at what he says with the possibility that it is all deliberate lies trying to spread false information incorrect leads.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Seriously, herk, you're hurting yourself by posting so much, I think. Hold back a bit and think before you post, buddy. I won't FoS you on the grounds that I believe you're just a newb townie, but please, THINK.
I think that he should keep posting stuff. He might turn up something valuable eventually. Or he could say enough scummy things to make a valid case against himself. Although, I will say that if his posts aren't thought out then he risks burning us out to the point where we just kinda disregard whatever he says...