BREAKING NEWS: ARIZONA CONGRESS WOMAN SHOT IN HEAD!

[thegreekdog]

Oh, TGd you little schemer.

My solution to this problem and every problem facing mankind today would be to initiate mass suicide. No more mankind, no more problems.

the problem with your question is that its a tiny piece to a much larger more complex problem. Other than groups lobbying companies to pull sponsorhip from shows which are inciting violence or just being batshit and irresponsible in general, like say a Glenn Beck. I don't think there is much that can be done, becasue the problem is systemic, there are huge structural problems with the us government, the media, the connections between them.

Which is why something like wikileaks is important.

I don't know how you get from irresponsible shock radio to the importance of wikileaks.

But, no, you didn't fall into my trap. Instead you neatly sidestepped with some generalized commentary on the "huge structural problems with the us government [and] the media" citing the complexity. Well played.

[Aradhus]

http://fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/eliminationism-kill-all-liberals/

Your source is fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com?

Not exactly Le Monde, eh? Oh well, you did the best you knew how.

E for Effort

I picked the first link closest to the cursor. Sue me.

[saxitoxin]

Which is why something like wikileaks is important.

So it's a good thing Giffords was shot then?

After all, she voted to confirm Attorney-General Holder who is seeking criminal indictments against Julian Assange that could result in a sentence of death.

[saxitoxin]

http://fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/eliminationism-kill-all-liberals/

Your source is fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com?

Not exactly Le Monde, eh? Oh well, you did the best you knew how.

E for Effort

I picked the first link closest to the cursor. Sue me.

As John noted above, you didn't pick a very good one. Surely you got better book learnin' at Lancaster University or Bradford or whatever diploma mill you went to than that?

[Aradhus]

Oh, TGd you little schemer.

My solution to this problem and every problem facing mankind today would be to initiate mass suicide. No more mankind, no more problems.

the problem with your question is that its a tiny piece to a much larger more complex problem. Other than groups lobbying companies to pull sponsorhip from shows which are inciting violence or just being batshit and irresponsible in general, like say a Glenn Beck. I don't think there is much that can be done, becasue the problem is systemic, there are huge structural problems with the us government, the media, the connections between them.

Which is why something like wikileaks is important.

I don't know how you get from irresponsible shock radio to the importance of wikileaks.

But, no, you didn't fall into my trap. Instead you neatly sidestepped with some generalized commentary on the "huge structural problems with the us government [and] the media" citing the complexity. Well played.

Uh, the point of the media in the us is to challenge the government. They don't. They reiterate gov talking points, or on the other side of the spectrum, they make shit up. Wikileaks is realeasing actual information.

[thegreekdog]

Oh, TGd you little schemer.

My solution to this problem and every problem facing mankind today would be to initiate mass suicide. No more mankind, no more problems.

the problem with your question is that its a tiny piece to a much larger more complex problem. Other than groups lobbying companies to pull sponsorhip from shows which are inciting violence or just being batshit and irresponsible in general, like say a Glenn Beck. I don't think there is much that can be done, becasue the problem is systemic, there are huge structural problems with the us government, the media, the connections between them.

Which is why something like wikileaks is important.

I don't know how you get from irresponsible shock radio to the importance of wikileaks.

But, no, you didn't fall into my trap. Instead you neatly sidestepped with some generalized commentary on the "huge structural problems with the us government [and] the media" citing the complexity. Well played.

Uh, the point of the media in the us is to challenge the government. They don't. They reiterate gov talking points, or on the other side of the spectrum, they make shit up. Wikileaks is realeasing actual information.

I understand that (and I agree with you).

My question is how does wikileaks factor into talk radio (which is not news by the way) allegedly leading this guy to kill people? I don't get it.

EDIT - Wikileaks also has nothing to do with domestic US politics and everything to do with international relations... different balls of wax.

[Aradhus]

http://fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/eliminationism-kill-all-liberals/

Your source is fitnessfortheoccasion.wordpress.com?

Not exactly Le Monde, eh? Oh well, you did the best you knew how.

E for Effort

I picked the first link closest to the cursor. Sue me.

As John noted above, you didn't pick a very good one. Surely you got better book learnin' at Lancaster University or Bradford or whatever diploma mill you went to than that?

Did limbaugh say don't kill all liberlas, or did he not? I couldn't give a ats ass about your shitty little quips about my education or the link I posted. Carry on hombre. Maybe one day you'll win an argument.

[saxitoxin]

Uh, the point of the media in the us is to challenge the government. They don't. They reiterate gov talking points, or on the other side of the spectrum, they make shit up. Wikileaks is realeasing actual information.

Earlier you were decrying the right for challenging the government. Now you're decrying the media for not challenging the government. Perhaps you could make a flowchart of which groups get your seal of approval to challenge the government and which don't? It's getting difficult to keep track of this elaborately constructed, precariously balanced fantasy.

[saxitoxin]

Did limbaugh say don't kill all liberlas, or did he not?

Yes, as John already answered. So were you going to provide a source where he said do kill all the liberals? Even another free blog would be helpful if you can get it right this time. You're batting 0-1 right now.

I couldn't give a ats ass about your shitty little quips about my education or the link I posted.

I regret I don't know what a "liberlas" or an "ats ass" is; Lancaster U colloquialisms, perhaps?

[Aradhus]

Oh, TGd you little schemer.

My solution to this problem and every problem facing mankind today would be to initiate mass suicide. No more mankind, no more problems.

the problem with your question is that its a tiny piece to a much larger more complex problem. Other than groups lobbying companies to pull sponsorhip from shows which are inciting violence or just being batshit and irresponsible in general, like say a Glenn Beck. I don't think there is much that can be done, becasue the problem is systemic, there are huge structural problems with the us government, the media, the connections between them.

Which is why something like wikileaks is important.

I don't know how you get from irresponsible shock radio to the importance of wikileaks.

But, no, you didn't fall into my trap. Instead you neatly sidestepped with some generalized commentary on the "huge structural problems with the us government [and] the media" citing the complexity. Well played.

Uh, the point of the media in the us is to challenge the government. They don't. They reiterate gov talking points, or on the other side of the spectrum, they make shit up. Wikileaks is realeasing actual information.

I understand that (and I agree with you).

My question is how does wikileaks factor into talk radio (which is not news by the way) allegedly leading this guy to kill people? I don't get it.

EDIT - Wikileaks also has nothing to do with domestic US politics and everything to do with international relations... different balls of wax.

Who said talk radio lead this guy to kill people. The political rhetoric in the US is toxic was the assertion. Wikileaks is a foot in the door which could lead to a better more transparent enviroment in many areas.

[Aradhus]

Did limbaugh say don't kill all liberlas, or did he not?

Yes, as John already answered. So were you going to provide a source where he said do kill all the liberals? Even another free blog would be helpful if you can get it right this time. You're batting 0-1 right now.

I couldn't give a ats ass about your shitty little quips about my education or the link I posted.

I regret I don't know what a "liberlas" or an "ats ass" is; Lancaster U colloquialisms, perhaps?

I never said Limbaugh said kill all liberals. Seems like my typing sucks as much as your reading comprehension.

[saxitoxin]

Who said talk radio lead this guy to kill people. The political rhetoric in the US is toxic was the assertion. Wikileaks is a foot in the door which could lead to a better more transparent enviroment in many areas.

So you're saying it's possible Loughner tried to kill Giffords because he was motivated to protect Julian Assange from being prosecuted by the Attorney-General for whom Giffords voted to empower?

I never said Limbaugh said kill all liberals.

You lost that game the first time we played, pages ago, with your "the link didn't say/did say" merry-go-round. I understand Bradford has taught you to accept less out of life but, still, didn't you feel embarrassment at that? I believe you should have felt embarrassment. Don't you agree? I'm sure you do.

[Aradhus]

Uh, I was right both times, idiot. What you claimed was in that link and what was actually in it was different.


For example, had I said Limbaugh stated to kill all liberals, that would be me missquoting what was in the link I posted.

Jog on, knucklehead.

[saxitoxin]

Uh, I was right both times, idiot. What you claimed was in that link and what was actually in it was different.


For example, had I said Limbaugh stated to kill all liberals, that would be me missquoting what was in the link I posted.

Jog on, knucklehead.

indeed ...

Aradhus: "Rush Limbaugh talks about killing liberals"

from Aradhus' source "fitnessforlife.blogspot.com" or whatever it was: "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals."

What was your course of study at Bradford? IT? Auto Repair? Landscaping? I ask only because there might be a topic you'd feel more conversant in than this one.

[Aradhus]

The full quote from that link "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus — living fossils — so we will never forget what these people stood for"

[saxitoxin]

The full quote from that link "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus — living fossils — so we will never forget what these people stood for"

And yet that still doesn't correlate to your increasingly tortured claim of "Rush Limbaugh talks about killing liberals."

So anyway, Aradhus, what kind of brake pads should I get for street driving with a V6? Do you do installs?

[Aradhus]

The full quote from that link "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus — living fossils — so we will never forget what these people stood for"

And yet that still doesn't correlate to your increasingly tortured claim of "Rush Limbaugh talks about killing liberals."

So anyway, Aradhus, what kind of brake pads should I get for street driving with a V6? Do you do installs?

Just concede you delusional bat. If I said lets kill 10 jews, no wait, 8, lets leave 2 to remind us how retarded they are, I'm advocating killing jews. Lets not kill all the jews, we need to keep a reminder of what these disgusting beings were.

[saxitoxin]

The full quote from that link "I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have two on every campus — living fossils — so we will never forget what these people stood for"

And yet that still doesn't correlate to your increasingly tortured claim of "Rush Limbaugh talks about killing liberals."

So anyway, Aradhus, what kind of brake pads should I get for street driving with a V6? Do you do installs?

If I said lets kill 10 jews, no wait, 8, lets leave 2 to remind us how retarded they are, I'm advocating killing jews.

And yet he didn't say "lets [sic] kill 10 liberals, no wait, 8, lets [sic] leave 2 to remind us how retarded they are."

I'm very sorry you're having such terrible difficulty - both in correctly conjugating one-syllable words and in correctly juxtaposing two statements. Perhaps a tall glass of water and a few deep breaths would help? Whaddya say, Aradhus? Would that help?

[Aradhus]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

[thegreekdog]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

Oh mother of pearl! Of course he wasn't advocating killing liberals!!!! Rush Limbaugh does what he does to make money, not to win political office or kill other people. How do people not understand this? I don't sit here and accuse Keith Olbermann of shit like this!

[Aradhus]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

Oh mother of pearl! Of course he wasn't advocating killing liberals!!!! Rush Limbaugh does what he does to make money, not to win political office or kill other people. How do people not understand this? I don't sit here and accuse Keith Olbermann of shit like this!

Keith olbermann talks about killing conservatives? I believe the topic was toxic rhetoric. Rush makes money because he preys on the stupid, inciting stupid fucks into potentially commiting violent acts.

[saxitoxin]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

Do you believe Goldfinger was a documentary film about the Cold War, Aradhus? I'm honestly asking because I think you might. Do you?

[Aradhus]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

Oh mother of pearl! Of course he wasn't advocating killing liberals!!!! Rush Limbaugh does what he does to make money, not to win political office or kill other people. How do people not understand this? I don't sit here and accuse Keith Olbermann of shit like this!

By the way,. are you arguing that its ok for Rush to talk about killing specific groups of people? Because that's exactly what it sounds like.

[saxitoxin]

Keith olbermann talks about killing conservatives? I believe the topic was toxic rhetoric. Rush makes money because he preys on the stupid, inciting stupid fucks into potentially commiting violent acts.

Over the 20 years or so that he's been broadcasting, roughly how many years have you been a listener?

You may be right about this. I don't know; I've never listened to him. But it sounds like you do a lot. So when was the last show of his to which you listened?

[Aradhus]

So, he wasn't at all advocating killing liberals from that quote? Is that your (dishonest) position?

Do you believe Goldfinger was a documentary film about the Cold War, Aradhus? I'm honestly asking because I think you might. Do you?

I believe the cold war was a documentary film about Aradhus sticking his gold finger up your ass.