Moderator: Community Team
Dlanor A. Knox wrote:Justinassss wrote:I'll wait for input from the other players, or maybe a miracle might happen and Justin provides us with some actual information on his character.
I am fed up with your same reasoning again and again. You have written a very long post to claim you don't know nothing. And you are still waiting for my mystical explanation about I don't know what. Listen all:
I have my tactics. I know what I am doing. I know my role. I CAN'T REVEAL IT TO YOU, SO DO NOT WAIT FOR THIS!!!!! The game wouldn't be interesting, then. How could I play with you if you know who I am???????
So, the only thing I suggest is to try to find someone else to lynch.
From my previous game and analysis I have recently done, I am concluding this:
Unvote VOTE STEAKER - because you are the most concerned about my unrevealed role and you look the most suspicious and afraid of me. This is my final vote for Day1. My job on Day1 is done. Now everything is up to you.
This is a nice example of Streaker Rolefishing even on day 1.
Dlanor A. Knox wrote:I'm not claiming until you present a case against me.
Other than "you were lurking" which wasn't me.
The only point for my lynch was the deadline, which is now over a week away. I want people to actually vote on something decent.
One more thing, claims don't come till L-1.
Dlanor A. Knox wrote:Point #3:Campin_Killer wrote:I'm going to put him at L-2 and hopefully nothing else happens after that. vote herk
+1 MeDeFe, why would Justin claim 3rd party
This is an example of Campin_Killer not really reading. Apparently you guys find that scummy here. I just call it null. In anycase, he twists MeDeFe's words, AND fails to realize that the whole reason Justin was lynched the previous day was for claiming Jester (3rd party). I find this unusual for someone who was so interested in leading that lynch.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hey all sorry for going dark I've been trying to catch up in classes. I've caught up in one of my other games, and I going to go through this one again either later on tonight or tomorrow before work.
Good to see Knox replace, usually has something to say, if a bit confrontational.
-Tails
Knox wrote:Mafia would know that Justinasss isn't scum fake claiming Jester. So either way, it would benefit scum to has the hammer fall on Justin (assuming that Jesters in this game are neutral and do not cause a loss-con in all other factions). Only scum would know that Justin wasn't scum, and would be the most likely to push his wagon.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I would like to hear from CK, but he's been absent lately. His profile says he hasn't even logged on since the 20th. Hopefully Commander can get a replacement for him.
-Tails
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
naxus wrote:Usually if campin's around he'll drop some sort of line in here so I agree with Skoff that he's just not on CC.
Also Dlanor(and skoff some), You've never played a game with Herk otherwise you'd know that fluff isnt always a sign of scummyness but some peoples stlye
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:naxus wrote:Usually if campin's around he'll drop some sort of line in here so I agree with Skoff that he's just not on CC.
Also Dlanor(and skoff some), You've never played a game with Herk otherwise you'd know that fluff isnt always a sign of scummyness but some peoples stlye
QFT on both accounts. Some time ago I sent CK a role PM for another mafia and he hasn't even read it and so was replaced. I guess I would rather see replaced then lynched, but then again there are several people I would like to see replaced. On the fence still, but if I don't see something else to pounce on I say we go for CK.
Dlanor A. Knox wrote:edocsil wrote:naxus wrote:Usually if campin's around he'll drop some sort of line in here so I agree with Skoff that he's just not on CC.
Also Dlanor(and skoff some), You've never played a game with Herk otherwise you'd know that fluff isnt always a sign of scummyness but some peoples stlye
QFT on both accounts. Some time ago I sent CK a role PM for another mafia and he hasn't even read it and so was replaced. I guess I would rather see replaced then lynched, but then again there are several people I would like to see replaced. On the fence still, but if I don't see something else to pounce on I say we go for CK.
So your argument is Meta?
No facts?
Great job.
Dlanor A. Knox wrote:edocsil wrote:naxus wrote:Usually if campin's around he'll drop some sort of line in here so I agree with Skoff that he's just not on CC.
Also Dlanor(and skoff some), You've never played a game with Herk otherwise you'd know that fluff isnt always a sign of scummyness but some peoples stlye
QFT on both accounts. Some time ago I sent CK a role PM for another mafia and he hasn't even read it and so was replaced. I guess I would rather see replaced then lynched, but then again there are several people I would like to see replaced. On the fence still, but if I don't see something else to pounce on I say we go for CK.
So your argument is Meta?
No facts?
Great job.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Dlanor A. Knox wrote:edocsil wrote:naxus wrote:Usually if campin's around he'll drop some sort of line in here so I agree with Skoff that he's just not on CC.
Also Dlanor(and skoff some), You've never played a game with Herk otherwise you'd know that fluff isnt always a sign of scummyness but some peoples stlye
QFT on both accounts. Some time ago I sent CK a role PM for another mafia and he hasn't even read it and so was replaced. I guess I would rather see replaced then lynched, but then again there are several people I would like to see replaced. On the fence still, but if I don't see something else to pounce on I say we go for CK.
So your argument is Meta?
No facts?
Great job.
I believe that the others have stated the facts several times, I have nothing to add to that case beyond the fact that he is truly gone. It is also the reason for me being on the fence, the ideas really are not mine.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Knox, I've never played with you, but I am already starting to like you. You provide pretty good analysis in an organized and coherent manner and you seem to have a pretty good scum sense.
That said, your defense sucks. I'm not sure if this is due to your folly, or just because you are a replacement (its always hard to defend actions you didn't make) but regardless, I want to hear something a little more. Your response to the case against you is basically, "there are other leads out there so don't lynch me." However, that does nothing to dissuade us from still pursuing the case we had on fuzzy.
The accusations you make are largely based on your own wagon. They are good accusations, but if you turn up scum then they basically have no worth anymore. Until you can convince us you are town, its hard to take your accusations clearly. Regardless of how desperate the town may have been during the development of the case against fuzzy, the fact remains that there is a case and you aren't defending yourself very well.
unvote now that the pressure of the deadline is off and it seems like we are going to have some good answers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users