Conquer Club

ObamaCare - exchanges ,report your states options!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby notyou2 on Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:19 pm

HapSmo19 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:If we should repeal "Socialized Healthcare" then we should repeal it ALL: No medicare, no medicaid, and limits on VA care where they cannot get any treatment or checkups UNLESS it's directly related to a WAR WOUND.


Hmmm. Taking care of children, the elderly and veterans are pretty much the things I don't mind paying taxes for. Especially when I practice my chipping for free on the VA golf course when I take my Viet Nam vet friend to his appointments there.


That's very communist of you Hapsmo. Or at the very least, very socialist of you. Perhaps you aren't all bad after all.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:24 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Who provides health insurance if the health insurance companies go out of business?


The government, which is what progressives want.


What progressives ACTUALLY want is for reasonable, decent health care to be provided to all Americans, so that the taxpayer can quit shouldering the massive costs associated with the situation as it existed.



Here's a joke.

Image

Which part of this chart is the part you say the American taxpayer is "massively" shouldering? Which part deals with the money that goes to health care, from the gov't, because people do not have decent healthcare? is it in the everything else? cuz I would like to break that down further, and then see what segment of that 18% is so massive
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Phatscotty on Sun Jan 30, 2011 9:28 pm

Timminz wrote:Image

The irony of an American flying this avatar is highly enjoyable, to me.


I can see how it would be.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:31 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Who provides health insurance if the health insurance companies go out of business?


The government, which is what progressives want.


What progressives ACTUALLY want is for reasonable, decent health care to be provided to all Americans, so that the taxpayer can quit shouldering the massive costs associated with the situation as it existed.


Which part of this chart is the part you say the American taxpayer is "massively" shouldering?


The part where a band-aid at the hospital costs me $38.00.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Phatscotty on Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:09 am

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Who provides health insurance if the health insurance companies go out of business?


The government, which is what progressives want.


What progressives ACTUALLY want is for reasonable, decent health care to be provided to all Americans, so that the taxpayer can quit shouldering the massive costs associated with the situation as it existed.


Which part of this chart is the part you say the American taxpayer is "massively" shouldering?

Image


The part where a band-aid at the hospital costs me $38.00.


that's a massive taxpayer burden?



38$ Band-aids? Easy. BYOBA
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby PLAYER57832 on Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:42 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Who provides health insurance if the health insurance companies go out of business?


The government, which is what progressives want.


What progressives ACTUALLY want is for reasonable, decent health care to be provided to all Americans, so that the taxpayer can quit shouldering the massive costs associated with the situation as it existed.



Here's a joke.

Image

Which part of this chart is the part you say the American taxpayer is "massively" shouldering? Which part deals with the money that goes to health care, from the gov't, because people do not have decent healthcare? is it in the everything else? cuz I would like to break that down further, and then see what segment of that 18% is so massive


Most of the healthcare burden is shouldered at the state and local levels. A lot is "hidden", not shown in neat charts like that one, because hospitals and doctors wind up shouldering costs for those without money and wind up passing part of that cost onto everyone else.

THAT failure to look at the whole picture is why you fail to understand both the true costs AND why we really do pay so much more than any other country in the world for our care.

Its rather like your glib comment about that 300K IRS agents would offset the costs of putting kids on Medicaid. You have no idea how much money goes to those kids.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby PLAYER57832 on Mon Jan 31, 2011 9:51 am

thegreekdog wrote:Who provides health insurance if the health insurance companies go out of business?

My first, cynacal answer is the same folks providing care to so many people right now, namely taxpayers.

Actually, I doubt they will fully go out of business, they will just change their model so they no longer represent what they are now. Private insurance exists in countries with fully universal health care, they just are not quite as profitable (sometimes they make money off other insurance, see offering healthcare as a way to bring people "in".. sort of like special offers and sales bring people into stores to spend more money overall) or may be for "backup" or "premium care" only. Going into all that would require several threads, though.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby PLAYER57832 on Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:30 am

Woodruff wrote:The Woodruffs of the site? Displaying your ignorance again, stahrgazer? At least try not to be an utter moron, please. Good Lord, a very basic reading of my posts on this site should tell you what a dumbass reference that is. Your inability to think critically enough to recognize the differences between what you're talking about here and what I referred to above is astounding.
I believe you are arguing with Phattscotty, not Woodruff. However, even he won't go so far as to claim your mom shouldn't get care. He just sees the problem as the government, not private companies.

Anyhow, since its "private story" time, I am beyond angry right now. My husband is in constant pain. That is not new. His knees have been "bone on bone" for about 15 years now. He is tough and has a VERY high pain tolerance. I hear about his knees, but few others are even aware. What is new is that he has a fluidous bulb on his elbow and a shoulders that hurt constantly and don't fully function. At times, he cannot lift a few pounds, never mind our 40 pound son. Again, this is no wimp. I know for a fact he is going through pain every day that would lay out many others, even other "tough guys". He did go to the doctor, but as above, the doctor knows we could not afford an MRI, so he told him to ice it.

How did we get to this point?
My husband was laid off. Laid off under conditions that, had he worked for a private company (or state or federal agency), would have constituted "grounds" for a lawsuit. Local governments, though are largely exempt, so...

So we were eligible for COBRA ... at a cost of over $1300 a month. Our income is just barely too high for we adults to be covered by Medicaid. Because the kids have "conditions" they have always been eligible. (before Medicaid just paid the co-pays, dental and eye. Now it pays all). We were eligible for Adult Basic and blithely applied. We waited 45 days before someone finally informed us there was a 2 YEAR waiting list for the program! (in PA about 44,000 adults apparently were on the program) Now its ending completely (February 11 it ends). So, we were told, we were eligible for "Special Care". This is not a direct government program. Apparently, it is private insurance that is subsidized by taxpayers. (found this out later) Blue Cross, the same group whom we have paid for over 20 years. Sounds good, EXCEPT..... you have to exhaust COBRA. So, we qualify for coverage costing $269 per person (went up in Jan, but not by much), but we have to pay for the $1300 for 6 months before we can get it. The real trick is that by waiting, they get to exclude any and all pre-existing conditions. So, this low-cost insurance is fully available as a back up plan to low income people who probably 'barely need it" anyway, that is, people who need it just "in case", not those who are planning on really using it.

The next option is "Faircare". This is open to people with pre-existing conditions. EXCEPT, you have to have been utterly without insurance for 6 months. As far as that goes, my husband's employer is really doing us a favor by not insuring us now. EXCEPT, that plan has a very limited enrollment. So far, there are openings. But, PA just ended the Adult care option, and the governor is looking to allow all of those people to move into the Faircare plans. Maybe we will be lucky. On 12:01 AM, on the 6 month day, I plan to hit the computer and submit applications for my husband and myself. Maybe we will still find openings. If not....

This is the part that makes me the most angry. Politicians keep wanting to trot out these programs, 'Adult basic", "special care", etc and claim that they are "offering options", reasonable options to people not covered by group plans. But, read the small print and you find out that these programs only extend to a very few people. AND, for the most part, are "voluntary" programs put forward by private companies, basically in order to take legal pressure of the companies for nefarious practices regarding the rest of the population.

let me add in one final note. Look at the loss of productivity all this represents. People who are not healthy cannot work at peak. If they don't work at peak, they don't contribute fully to society as they could. I know I have said it before, but my husband is a volunteer Fire chief. There are only 2 other people, one currently disabled, the other often tied in a prison job(cannot just leave when on duty), who have the training my husband has. He responds now. But, if things get much worse, the time will come when he will be in too much pain to be effective. So, in our case, insurance company dirty tricks may truly harm our entire community. That may be a slightly extreme example, but it is definitely not isolated. Everyone may not be a trained volunteer, btu everyone can contribute more when they are healthy than not.

That is another of those "hidden" costs too many Republicans and Tea Partiers try to simply ignore. It is yet another reason why real insurance reform IS cost-effective overall.
Corporal PLAYER57832
 
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Night Strike on Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:53 pm

Player, your sob story is just further proof that we need an individual-based, portable insurance system in place of the current employer-based system. There's no need to institute a government system when individual plans can take care of our needs.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jan 31, 2011 12:59 pm

Night Strike wrote:Player, your sob story is just further proof that we need an individual-based, portable insurance system in place of the current employer-based system. There's no need to institute a government system when individual plans can take care of our needs.


Yeah Player, take your tears somewhere else. Tears will not be covered in my Health Care system.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Night Strike on Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:03 pm

The lawsuit brought by 26 states led to the mandate to be ruled unconstitutional!!!!!

Epic win for the states, epic fail for the government.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:05 pm

Link please?

Nevermind - found the news story

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110131/ap_ ... overhaul_1
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Night Strike on Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:40 pm

He also said that since there was no sever-ability clause, the whole thing was overturned.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Postby Neoteny on Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:42 pm

Neoteny wrote:If this site is still around in ten years, I do plan on coming back and laughing at all the paranoids worried about socialism.


A little over nine more years before I come back and laugh at all the crazies worried about socialism.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
Major Neoteny
 
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:04 pm

Night Strike wrote:The lawsuit brought by 26 states led to the mandate to be ruled unconstitutional!!!!!

Epic win for the states, epic fail for the government.

This is so epic, someone should write a tale about it. Epic. Epicxcors. Epicathon.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby saxitoxin on Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:14 pm

PLAYER57832 wrote:Because the kids have "conditions" they have always been eligible. (before Medicaid just paid the co-pays, dental and eye. Now it pays all).


Once Senator Obama's programme takes full effect you won't even have that. It'll be cash or nothing. Better start saving.

Insurance Donors to Obama Campaign Terminate All Health Care for Children; Barack and Mitch Attend Gala Ball and Dinner, Enjoy Fine California Wines / Socialize with Celebrities
Politico wrote:Health insurers in 34 states have stopped selling child-only insurance policies as a result of the health reform law, and the market continues to destablize.
Since September, the health reform law has barred insurers from withholding policies to children under 19 who have a pre-existing condition. Rather than take on the burdensome cost of writing policies for potentially-pricey medical conditions, many carriers decided to leave the market altogether.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/01 ... Page2.html

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby stahrgazer on Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:36 pm

notyou2 wrote:
HapSmo19 wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:If we should repeal "Socialized Healthcare" then we should repeal it ALL: No medicare, no medicaid, and limits on VA care where they cannot get any treatment or checkups UNLESS it's directly related to a WAR WOUND.


Hmmm. Taking care of children, the elderly and veterans are pretty much the things I don't mind paying taxes for. Especially when I practice my chipping for free on the VA golf course when I take my Viet Nam vet friend to his appointments there.


That's very communist of you Hapsmo. Or at the very least, very socialist of you. Perhaps you aren't all bad after all.


It is "socialist," and that's one point I was making.

The other point is, why do only elderly, children, veterans, or the wealthy deserve to be healthy?

If you look at statistics that compare the health of the average working-age person in any country vs. the amounts expended on healthcare per capita in each country, we Americans are sadly near last place in health, and head the list in cost. Could this be because our healthcare system is based first on making the insurance industry rich, then on caring for elderly, children, and veterans; and has almost no focus on keeping the working-age person healthy?

Back when things like medicare and medicaid were established, the rest of the population was usually covered by healthcare through their place of employment. Given that, there was little need to think about "the working population." Times have changed, however; now, very few employers provide healthcare (not to mention, sometimes there just aren't enough jobs available for the working-age population.)

Just as, at one time, there was no need for social security, or medicare; and just as, at one time, there was no need for medicaid... there was a time when there was no need for government intervention to help ensure the health of the working-age population.

To repeat myself, however: Times have changed.

Yet, all I see "against" this sort of all-encompassing healthcare is rage that the country might go "socialist" with healthcare if they implement it. People forget, though, that medicaid, medicare, and the Veteran's hospitals that are now historical untouchable, are also, "socialized healthcare."

So, to repeat again: if the argument against it is because it's "socialist" and "socialized healthcare" should be repealed, then repeal all the forms of "socialized healthcare."

Otherwise, recognize that, just as Eisenhower saw that times had changed then, and some "socialist" programs were needed to help our aged citizens; and later, administrations saw that some "socialist" programs were needed to protect our youngest citizens; we should all be able to see, now, that times have again changed, and some "socialist" programs are now needed to help the in-between age, working citizens.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby saxitoxin on Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:45 pm

stahrgazer wrote:The other point is, why do only elderly, children, veterans, or the wealthy deserve to be healthy?


For that matter, why do only farmers get to have food, only mechanics get to have functioning automobiles, only projectionists get to watch movies and only plumbers get to have unclogged toilets? :-s

stahrgazer wrote:now, very few employers provide healthcare


A majority, objectively, [does not =] "very few."

Image
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13386
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:12 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:The government, which is what progressives want.


What progressives ACTUALLY want is for reasonable, decent health care to be provided to all Americans, so that the taxpayer can quit shouldering the massive costs associated with the situation as it existed.


Which part of this chart is the part you say the American taxpayer is "massively" shouldering?

Image


The part where a band-aid at the hospital costs me $38.00.


that's a massive taxpayer burden?


If you weren't trying so hard to overlook it, you'd recognize it for the example that it is.

Phatscotty wrote:38$ Band-aids? Easy. BYOBA


If you weren't trying so hard to overlook it, you'd recognize it for the example that it is.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Woodruff on Mon Jan 31, 2011 8:14 pm

Night Strike wrote:Player, your sob story is just further proof that we need an individual-based, portable insurance system in place of the current employer-based system. There's no need to institute a government system when individual plans can take care of our needs.


Why would your suggestion of an individual-based insurance system be any less likely to throw customers off the bus as soon as they had a major problem that the company didn't want to take care of than the current system is? I can't think of any inherent reason why that would be.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby rockfist on Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:31 am

Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:Player, your sob story is just further proof that we need an individual-based, portable insurance system in place of the current employer-based system. There's no need to institute a government system when individual plans can take care of our needs.


Why would your suggestion of an individual-based insurance system be any less likely to throw customers off the bus as soon as they had a major problem that the company didn't want to take care of than the current system is? I can't think of any inherent reason why that would be.


He has a point there...better rethink your argument. I am too tired to defend it by remaking it for you.
User avatar
Brigadier rockfist
 
Posts: 2177
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:17 pm
Location: On the Wings of Death.
3222

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed in the House

Postby stahrgazer on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:45 am

saxitoxin wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:The other point is, why do only elderly, children, veterans, or the wealthy deserve to be healthy?


For that matter, why do only farmers get to have food, only mechanics get to have functioning automobiles, only projectionists get to watch movies and only plumbers get to have unclogged toilets? :-s

stahrgazer wrote:now, very few employers provide healthcare


A majority, objectively, does not = "very few"


Yes, it does.

You need to reconsider your "objective majority" graph, because it's comparing apples to oranges.

apples
Under "employee sponsored" back when ss and medicare were established, employers primarily footed the entire bill for their employees as part of their "wages and benefits" packages.

oranges
Under "employee sponsored" TODAY, they've lumped any insurances where the employer agreed to let some specific company sell its insurance to the employees, even when the employer is not contributing a dime toward the healthcare. VERY FEW companies even contribute, and almost NONE foot the entire bill to purchase employee insurance anymore.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby stahrgazer on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:49 am

AndyDufresne wrote:
Night Strike wrote:The lawsuit brought by 26 states led to the mandate to be ruled unconstitutional!!!!!

Epic win for the states, epic fail for the government.

This is so epic, someone should write a tale about it. Epic. Epicxcors. Epicathon.


--Andy



It really makes me wonder, though, how the DMV can MANDATE auto insurance if "requiring folks to purchase insurance" is unconstitutional.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant stahrgazer
 
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:59 am
Location: Figment of the Imagination...

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:51 am

stahrgazer wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Night Strike wrote:The lawsuit brought by 26 states led to the mandate to be ruled unconstitutional!!!!!

Epic win for the states, epic fail for the government.

This is so epic, someone should write a tale about it. Epic. Epicxcors. Epicathon.


--Andy



It really makes me wonder, though, how the DMV can MANDATE auto insurance if "requiring folks to purchase insurance" is unconstitutional.


You only need to purchase automobile insurance if you own a car.

If health insurance is mandated, you only need to purchase health insurance if you're alive.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Socialized Healthcare: Repealed/Pressure Building in Se

Postby Woodruff on Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:56 am

thegreekdog wrote:
stahrgazer wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
Night Strike wrote:The lawsuit brought by 26 states led to the mandate to be ruled unconstitutional!!!!!

Epic win for the states, epic fail for the government.

This is so epic, someone should write a tale about it. Epic. Epicxcors. Epicathon.


--Andy



It really makes me wonder, though, how the DMV can MANDATE auto insurance if "requiring folks to purchase insurance" is unconstitutional.


You only need to purchase automobile insurance if you own a car.

If health insurance is mandated, you only need to purchase health insurance if you're alive.


Not a good argument. A better argument is that for auto insurance, you are only required to purchase insurance to protect others from damage you cause to them. There's not really an equivalent situation regarding health insurance.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

PreviousNext

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users