Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
VioIet wrote:I would vote you, but I can't unvote.
TheSaxlad wrote:
Is this part of your role Vi? You can only vote commander, or you can only vote one person per day?
00iCon wrote:with our investigator being protected, maybe a no lynch is best? we definitely get info from an investigator who has already claimed.
just my two cents: i can't quite pin why, but i have a deep gut feeling Fircoal is anti-town.
Xeureb could be an alternative to a no-lynch. submarining has taken him very far.
strike wolf wrote:I think edoc's intent is to try to keep his body guard out of harms way and initially tried to guise the fact that he had one. Not sure but with no one countering the claim, I have to believe he's third party.
TheSaxlad wrote:Is this part of your role Vi? You can only vote commander, or you can only vote one person per day?
aage wrote:Too bad hunches don“t matter any more today.
This day is over as of now
Once I'm done writing a report on some research my university made me do, I'm posting a scene.
This may be tomorrow.
Flow520 wrote:aage wrote:Too bad hunches don“t matter any more today.
This day is over as of now
Once I'm done writing a report on some research my university made me do, I'm posting a scene.
This may be tomorrow.
Should we send you our night actions before or after this scene?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:Hmm...well I need to reread before I make much of a case...this scene though...the agent was by himself. An sk rather than mafia?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel swallowed slightly, but kept his nerve. "We do only what we're meant to do."
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Mr. Squirrel wrote:aage wrote:Mr. Squirrel swallowed slightly, but kept his nerve. "We do only what we're meant to do."
I died so valiantly...
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Commander9 wrote:I was beginning to totally lose interest here, but I'll stay around. I'll refrain from posting more until I've re-read the last couple of pages (or the whole thing, but then only @ weekend).
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Wait,wait,wait. There's something very odd going on here.
1.Sax makes that ridiculous post defending icon(seriously, not only did it make no sense at all, but has anyone ever seen Sax making a post that big?)
2. icon comes up with a obscure claim(I had to google "Sati matrix", she doesn't even have a wiki page)
3.Now comes the really weird bit:edocsil wrote:I don't understand the bulletproof bit. The character is a bit obscure but not too so. It would make a good fake claim to be handed to the mafia. That being said the character could plausibly be in the game. I just don't like the bulletproof bit. Are there any conditions to it? It would make more sense if there was.TheSaxlad wrote:
I imagine that if seraph was to die innocent child would die as well, as she came under the protection of the oracle.edocsil wrote:I believe he is assuming that the town will win. That being said I will unvote. If you bulletproofness is linked to the Seraph your role becomes far more plausible. And no I am not the Seraph, but it just fits better then a bulletproof child.
Here's how i read this exchange:
edoc:"Ok, not a bad fakeclaim, but you need to add more flavour. Give us something about the bulletproofness"
sax:" Oh, I've got it, how about blablabla"
edoc:"good enough, ok guys let's move on, unvote"
This just doesn't smell good at all. Sorry, but the obscure role + this very weird exchange = vote icon
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Hmm, not sure what to make of that claim.
Anyway, there's really no downside as far as I can see to testing it.
vote Sax
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Got to admit I haven't been able to read the last few pages properly, just skimmed them(was away for the weekend).
But with the deadline and all I'll say that a lynch is almost always better than a no lynch.
vote edoc.
I'll try to read this more thoroughly by tomorrow.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users