Bill O'Reilly Assaults President Obama

by **pimpdave** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 5:54 pm

with interruptions. 48 times!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDdM1q6qOfU

Does anyone remember the famous clip where Bill said (while Bush was President) that we had to support the President, even if the person in office wasn't the person for whom you voted?

If I can find it, I'll post. I for one always hoped President Bush would do a good job because that's what's best for our country.

It's time for Obama to stop being nice. The Republicans will never like you, Barry! They'll do everything they can to subvert you, like how they ruined the stimulus bill and then blamed you for what they did or forcing those awful compromises on healthcare!

PUBLIC OPTION NOW, BARRY.

by **Aradhus** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:47 pm

I was more bothered by the goofy worthless questions he was asking than the interruptions.

Also billo needs to direct his contempt towards a bitch of a different kind. The leader of the free world is a tease, bill, he's never totally going to give it up, vent yer frustations in a more productive, less civilized manner.

by **Phatscotty** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:49 pm

pimpdave wrote:with interruptions. 48 times!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDdM1q6qOfU

If I can find it, I'll post.

Dude,

your credibility is shot. Why post anything? oh, masturbating, how cute!

by **patsfan12** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:50 pm

guess who is a dumb ass

guess wat it is pimp dave

by **Phatscotty** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 6:52 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1vpB6h3ek4

by **Night Strike** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:59 pm

Oh man, pimpdave fell for the far left websites hook, line, and sinker. It's amazing that the only thing they can attack O'Reilly with is trumped up charges of him interrupting the president. First of all, the original AOLNews story said it was 20 interruptions, not your bogusly inflated number of 48. Secondly, have you ever even seen an interview with Obama? He drones on and on about his talking points until he has conveniently used up all of his allotted time. The only way to actually discuss issues in a 15 minute interview is to keep the conversation moving, not by letting the interviewee drone. Oh wait, pimpdave doesn't care about discussing the issues.

by **pimpdave** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:04 pm

Wait, Night Strike, how do you define "discussion"? Is it locking threads and spitefully banning users for having a different political view than yourself?

For that matter, how do you define "issues"? And what issues are there in this clip?

by **Phatscotty** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:11 pm

pimpdave wrote:Wait, Night Strike, how do you define "discussion"?

I bet it starts with O'rielly assaults president obama

by **Night Strike** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 9:19 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
pimpdave wrote:Wait, Night Strike, how do you define "discussion"?

I bet it starts with O'rielly assaults president obama

Seeing them throwing punches at each other would have been good entertainment.

by **DangerBoy** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:17 pm

Is President Obama going to press charges?

by **pimpdave** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:25 pm

DangerBoy wrote:Is President Obama going to press charges?

Yo I heard it was assault with deadly stank breath.

by **Symmetry** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:28 pm

Did you threaten to overrule him?

A British example of a politician avoiding a direct question. Obama did better, and O'Reilly did worse, but it was a bizarre exchange

by **Phatscotty** on Wed Feb 09, 2011 10:43 pm

Symmetry wrote:Did you threaten to overrule him?

A British example of a politician avoiding a direct question. Obama did better, and O'Reilly did worse, but it was a bizarre exchange

welcome back symm!

by **DirtyDishSoap** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:50 am

All things aside, Bills a f*ck nut.

Case dismissed.

by **nagerous** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:01 am

Symmetry wrote:Did you threaten to overrule him?

A British example of a politician avoiding a direct question. Obama did better, and O'Reilly did worse, but it was a bizarre exchange

Classic scene. O'Reilly looks like a right dicksplash in this one however.

by **nagerous** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:08 am

Night Strike wrote:Oh man, pimpdave fell for the far left websites hook, line, and sinker. It's amazing that the only thing they can attack O'Reilly with is trumped up charges of him interrupting the president. First of all, the original AOLNews story said it was 20 interruptions, not your bogusly inflated number of 48. Secondly, have you ever even seen an interview with Obama? He drones on and on about his talking points until he has conveniently used up all of his allotted time. The only way to actually discuss issues in a 15 minute interview is to keep the conversation moving, not by letting the interviewee drone. Oh wait, pimpdave doesn't care about discussing the issues.

Did you even watch the youtube? What O'Reilly did here was just downright rude, do you really think this is good interview practice? The entire time Barack could not even get a word in edge ways, instead O'Reilly with this 'holier than thou' attitude dominated the whole conversation in a manner of sheer arrogance. A complete lack of respect on his parts, it was simple point scoring except it fell flat on his face as he just looked like an arrogant moron with no common decency. Barack on the other hand was calm and composed the entire time, dealing with this bullshit - I'd have stood up a bit more if I was being treated this way but it wouldn't be becoming of a President, he knew that O'Reilly would be exposed for the charlatan he is.

by **Night Strike** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 12:27 pm

No, I didn't waste my time watching the YouTube shot when it was a 3 minute cut of a 15 minute interview to try to prove a political attack. Blatant dishonesty there. Why don't you watch the entire interview and get the context of when the president was interrupted? Watch the entire thing and then you can judge the actual interview. It's impossible to make an accurate interpretation watching a highly edited clip.

by **Woodruff** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:16 pm

Night Strike wrote:No, I didn't waste my time watching the YouTube shot when it was a 3 minute cut of a 15 minute interview to try to prove a political attack. Blatant dishonesty there. Why don't you watch the entire interview and get the context of when the president was interrupted? Watch the entire thing and then you can judge the actual interview. It's impossible to make an accurate interpretation watching a highly edited clip.

The "highly edited clip" is representative - I watched the interview and O'Reilly did come off looking like an ass.

by **Night Strike** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 1:22 pm

Woodruff wrote:
Night Strike wrote:No, I didn't waste my time watching the YouTube shot when it was a 3 minute cut of a 15 minute interview to try to prove a political attack. Blatant dishonesty there. Why don't you watch the entire interview and get the context of when the president was interrupted? Watch the entire thing and then you can judge the actual interview. It's impossible to make an accurate interpretation watching a highly edited clip.

The "highly edited clip" is representative - I watched the interview and O'Reilly did come off looking like an ass.

As long as people are basing their opinions on the entire interview and not just an edited clip, I'm fine with them forming their own opinions, even if I disagree with them. It's just when people use an edited clip like that to form an opinion that I question their motives.

by **nagerous** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 2:26 pm

Night Strike wrote:No, I didn't waste my time watching the YouTube shot when it was a 3 minute cut of a 15 minute interview to try to prove a political attack. Blatant dishonesty there. Why don't you watch the entire interview and get the context of when the president was interrupted? Watch the entire thing and then you can judge the actual interview. It's impossible to make an accurate interpretation watching a highly edited clip.

Alright, I've watched the interview and also his reactions to the video Fox News broadcast, it was extremely blood-curling especially when he describes the British Guardian newspaper as 'uber-left' for their concise criticism of this individual. Also, when he attempts to justify his rudeness when he says 'they hate you' right in Barack's face by showing the clip of him saying the same thing to George Dubya, there is a MASSIVE difference in body-language and his tone of voice and also wording between the two scenes that just made me want to vomit on this propaganda-fuelled nonsense.

Thank god for non-biased broadcasting at the BBC! I do take issue with Sky News though

by **Phatscotty** on Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:35 pm

nagerous wrote:
Night Strike wrote:No, I didn't waste my time watching the YouTube shot when it was a 3 minute cut of a 15 minute interview to try to prove a political attack. Blatant dishonesty there. Why don't you watch the entire interview and get the context of when the president was interrupted? Watch the entire thing and then you can judge the actual interview. It's impossible to make an accurate interpretation watching a highly edited clip.

Alright, I've watched the interview and also his reactions to the video Fox News broadcast, it was extremely blood-curling especially when he describes the British Guardian newspaper as 'uber-left' for their concise criticism of this individual. Also, when he attempts to justify his rudeness when he says 'they hate you' right in Barack's face by showing the clip of him saying the same thing to George Dubya, there is a MASSIVE difference in body-language and his tone of voice and also wording between the two scenes that just made me want to vomit on this propaganda-fuelled nonsense.

Thank god for non-biased broadcasting at the BBC! I do take issue with Sky News though

how dare Orielly have a preference

It's all good though. Obama is a big tough guy with very thick skin. He really doesn't need a bunch of lemmings licking his boots.