@edoc, Hey, maybe if you repeat it enough times that there's a case against me it'll magically make it true.
in the meantime all you've got is:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:edocsil wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:Guess I've put off defending long enough(what can I say, i too have been a lazy bugger lately).
edocsil wrote:Ok, here goes nothing.
VOTE HAGGIS
My reasoning, primarily bandwagoning when it was particularly easy to do so without rousing suspicion and then trying to kill claimed town power roles.
1.It isn't really bandwagoning if i'm providing good reasons for my votes.
2. If the only reason to lynch Sax after his claim was to "try to kill town power roles", then you are admitting to doing that yourself, correct?
Most my issues are with the first few lines.
With the count of wagoning you did on my case, you admitted that yourself. On Icon's case you said
Like I said about the vote on you.
1. Your case on me applies better on you. Therefore if it has any value, then my vote on you also had value.
2. It was definitely better than a no lynch.
Do you dispute any of these points?
edocsil wrote:Haggis_McMutton wrote:Here's how i read this exchange:
edoc:"Ok, not a bad fakeclaim, but you need to add more flavour. Give us something about the bulletproofness"
sax:" Oh, I've got it, how about blablabla"
edoc:"good enough, ok guys let's move on, unvote"
This just doesn't smell good at all. Sorry, but the obscure role + this very weird exchange = vote icon
The only way this makes sense is if me, Icon and Sax are all scum together, which even back then should have been obviously not the case.
That's not how it's done. you can't state exact theories like that, they will very likely be wrong. What I saw in that exchange was both you and sax being linked with icon. Sax had some previous posts linking him with icon as well. Furthermore Icon had acted quite suspiciously. Are you telling me that the scummy guy who now has connections to two other people is not a good lynch candidate?
edocsil wrote:And on Sax's case, I pushed before he claimed role and after he claimed insane abilities. you pushed right after he claimed role. He is a threat to you for one reason or another.
He claimed insane abilities before he claimed the role. Pushing != voting. Here's my post before he claimed a role:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:TheSaxlad wrote:strike wolf wrote:I'm not a mathematician but I'm pretty sure that unlynchable townie+unlynchable townie=unbalanced. two unlynchable townies that could subsequently be recruited by the cult and become two unlynchable cult members=even more unbalanced. Frankly I think you're lying and the fact that you've claimed unlynchable tells me that there's not really a downside to pushing for your lynch.
Strike I am unlynchable for a reason.
I am also bulletproof until someone dies.
and I am town.
I assume you're also a doctor, cop, vigilante and busdriver ...
At this point you've got to claim. You can't just say "oh btw I'm unlynchable and bulletproof. K, thnks" and expect to be left alone ...
Also, this is a comment in general. IF you are indeed a townie, for god's sake stop claiming out of the blue like this in every game. Claiming is a last resort ffs ...
And also:
Haggis_McMutton wrote:Plus if we lynch him and he somehow turns out to actually be also unlynchable I'm guessing the mod will give us a few extra days(and piss himself laughing cause we tried to lynch 2 unlynchable characters on D1)
So, yeah. We want to hear you claim Sax, or we'll just test it.
If that's not pushing I don't know what is.
Once more you attempt to twist the facts, turning my not voting for him before he claims(aka being cautious) while stating that I'm clearly very suspicious of his supposed abilities into me voting him only because he claimed oracle...
I know you're supposed to be third party or something, but all these manipulation attempts don't seem very pro-town to me ...
Out of which you have refuted exactly 0 points...
Anyway, the other recent events:
VioIet wrote:Not really sure how to respond to this, but didn't want to ignore it either. I don't see the need to "out" anyone yet. Not everyone is bad.
This does seem weird. Why exactly won't you tell us more about this?
strike wolf wrote:Hmm you're right. Well does not appear he's claimed joat in all his games but in the Post Apoc. Mafia he also claimed town JOAT...
Gut tells me he's fake claiming in one of those. It's useful to fakeclaim a role you're actually currently playing, the play style is really fresh in your head, I almost did it in one game a while ago but decided people might spot it.
However the roleclaim seems decent.
@ Sax's theory:

You've got a tendency to come up with "theories" like that, don't you? There are way WAY to many assumptions building upon other assumptions in that thing. You don't need to make absurd theories like that, just look for anti-town behaviour and go from there.
edocsil wrote:The Twins are my bodyguard. Now you see why I dislike some of the claims there is not much space. You are also missing the Trainman, Fircoal. He admitted that. Either Niobe or the Architect doesn't fit IMO, but neither of you have done anything worth lynching over. Again IMO. That's why I pushed for haggis. With another claim or two the fakes are going to become blindingly obvious.
So let's clarify, you didn't push for me cause you think I'm scum, you pushed for me cause you figured you could get me to claim and you want to find out everyone's role so you can more easily win, right?
Your last sentence seems painfully close to suggesting that a mass claim would be good. We'll it'd be good for you I guess, not so much for town ...
Lastly, Tails, you've been completely under the radar day 2, yet have managed to cast a vote. A little anxious for more claims as well?