Rodion wrote:Streaker wrote:safariguy5 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:ok time to get serious is right. unvote vote firth as I agree with Gilligan. And Albarezzi had a joke vote stage which was longer, jokier and votier. It's a saxlad thing lol.
With deadline, we need everyone contributing as much as possible. If he isn't going to participate, I suggest a prod, failing in that, a replacement. But right now, I would like to see him get active.
unvote vote firth
I agree... But why hank? Any particular reason for him? There are a number of other inactives out there.
When you say "hank" are you referring to firth? Because there is a "hank" playing this game as well.
If you're referring to my original joke vote on Hank, it was because of his previous games.
Decently active in BTTF, but didn't post much of substance.
Almost completely lurking in Sully's NV 2, basically bandwagonned all his votes.
So, no, I'm not particularly hopeful that Hank is going to be great at providing evidence or making cases. At best, from what I've seen, he's someone with a vote who can help push a lynch. Nothing personal Hank, but you can't expect to post one liners and vote hop every game and be taken seriously.
That said, he is being more active this game, (could be the forum reshuffle, could be the possible prizes) but still not really contributing much to the conversation and still prone to vote hopping. I'm willing to pursue someone less active because I know that if we build up to a lynch, Hank will at least lend a vote to that whereas an inactive can't even do that.