Kugelblitz22 wrote:C14 is not the only method used to date rock, fossils, other. Scientists use a variety of radiometric dating techniques with various elements in rock to date objects. These different techniques almost always arrive at a consensus of dates. And of course let's not forget the all the other evidence that the Earth is superold. Namely the rate of expansion of the universe, tectonic plate science, the fact that dinasour bones are found way deeper in the Earth than people fossils.
I hope it is not the same consensus as they get with C14 coz then they are using just a skewed and flawed methods as with the C14.
I believe I have just successfully debunked C14 as a valid proof for dating fossils. Either that or you have run out of ways to prove I am wrong on the C14 topic. Are you saying you are ready to admit C14 dating is not valid proof?
kugelblitz22 wrote:...Namely the rate of expansion of the universe
I believe it is indicative of the creationist theory. The rate is accelerating I believe http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/2/11/3/1, I might be wrong not being knowledgeable in this area, but if it is accelerating then the big bang theory has a few problems with it. THe age of the earth being estimated by the old theory of the expansion of the universe will also then be flawed. The earths age was estimated using the old expansion theory which used a steady expansion rate (Hubbles constant?) which means the old theories about the age of the earth need to be tossed aside and discarded. THis therefore means any theories on the age of other things in the earth based on the ageing of the earth via universal expanasion is also moot ... and that I believe throws most of the pre -exisiting age of the universe and the solar system and the earth theories right out the window. However an accelerating universe would be consistent with an ever creative God would it not? hehehehe.
kugelblitz22 wrote:...tectonic plate science,
you mean like how when the waters burst up from under the earth (genesis flood account) they potentially caused gwondana land to split and start to move around some on plates. These plates were caused by the water thrusting up via vocanic<sic> fissures under the ocean at points we now define as geological plate edges?
Proof both ways there I think.
the fact that dinasour bones are found way deeper in the Earth than people fossils. [/b]
What about dinosaur bones found near the surface of the earth (ie within six to eight feet) and humans found deeper? Does that prove my theory?