Phatscotty wrote:
It's also been cited in this thread already that close to 10% of welfare recipients, in Florida anyways, are chemically dependent.
WRONG. The figure is closer to 6% at
mostPhatscotty wrote:
On the other hand, I know thousands of people in the Tea Party, and can honestly say I've never heard a single one of them mention anything about racist or any actions, not to mention there were people of all races at my Tea Party and everyone is welcome, and it's clear as day this is just a full-court smear (pathetic at that) against the TP. It's all about Debt and borrowing and spending too much...and that's it.
Wasn't going to get into this, but the majority of people
in my area who are tea partiers are avowed racists... many I strongly suspect are KKK members. Does that mean the Tea Party itself is racist? NO, more like what I have said before that there is no real Tea Party. Anyone who wants to use that title can and does, as long as they also say something about cutting taxes (doesn't have to be anything real, just talk is fine) they will even have "credibility".
BUT... what on earth does that have to do with folks on drugs who get welfare????
If you want to find people on welfare who are in trouble, look for the alchohol connection, not illegal drugs.
OH.. one more thing. The majority of people I know who were on welfare and drugs were ex Vietnahm vets. I do know this problem has NOT been solved. Now the problem is less getting addicted to morphine (for pain) and opiats (legal in much of southeast asia, so solidiers would use it and come home wanting more). Now the problem is more undiagnosed traumas that cause all sorts of other problems. Drug abuse is sometimes a side effect. ("self-medication")
Phatscotty wrote:
But hey, why would I make a statement based on my own experience?? I'm supposed to let somebody else tell me how to think and what is what, right??
You are supposed to understand that your personal experience may or may not be similar to a place a couple thousand miles away. You are supposed to know the difference between anecdotal evidence and data. (and don't go on about how I have given personal experiences. I have. I don't mistake it for verified data. Also, when I use anecdotal evidence, its because there is no better data out there right now).
BUT.. and here is the other point, even if your figure of 10% were correct (it truly is not), it still would not mean this program would either save taxpayers money, help those on welfare or any of your other claims.
Begin with your claim that the test is only $14. A marihuana ONLY test can be obtained for $15, so perhaps there is a source for $14. HOWEVER, anything that tests for any other drugs costs a good deal more $50-60. And that is
just for the test. It does not take into account the administrative costs, the cost of finding and apprehending those who don't come in for their tests, etc.