Moderator: Cartographers














		isaiah40 wrote:No, no no! Just the edges, just a smidgen so they look more on the map. But it's your call, and if no one else thinks they need that then ...














		















		





















		

















			













		natty_dread wrote:I was wrong














		gimil wrote:Wow your image seems to look fresher as a PNG, remember though that lack tends to resize images before uploading maps. Otherwise he will end up with huge amounts of used bandwidth.














		natty_dread wrote:gimil wrote:Wow your image seems to look fresher as a PNG, remember though that lack tends to resize images before uploading maps. Otherwise he will end up with huge amounts of used bandwidth.
I know. But if I save it as JPEG, and then lack compresses it into a smaller JPEG, then the JPEG artifacts from the first conversion accumulate - it's like taking a photo-copy of a photo-copy... by saving it as a PNG, then letting lack do the conversion directly from it, there will be less quality loss and artifacts.
Yes, maybe the difference is minute, but since we're forced to have our work converted into low quality JPEG:s, every small thing helps.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong














		












		













		















		













		













		













		













		













		













		






















		








		Evil DIMwit wrote:It's kind of strange that the forests are so close in color and texture to Denmark.














		

















		

















			















		Users browsing this forum: No registered users