Moderator: Community Team
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
-TG

Well, to explain the price of actors, one should examine the Actors Guild's methods of restricting competition, thus keeping prices high. But still, it makes sense that some actors are worth tens of millions because of the potential of profit involved in making a film, and highly valuable actors tend to be in very, very little supply, thus increasing their price.Army of GOD wrote:I agree, but unless you only watch independent films and such were the actors need another job just to live, then it's kind of hypocritical. Being a football player is a lot harder than acting (I think, I don't know personally though, I just have played football) yet actors make ridiculous amount of money as well. But people, especially football fans, are never going to stop watching games. Just like in the days of the Coliseum, people want to see blood.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
But other than that I couldn't give a f*ck about football. The fact that a player potentially CAN make $100 million by running around on a field seems odd to me. Just goes to show how many of you are getting suckered into paying for tickets, seats, gear, cable t.v., etc. etc. to watch a group of idiots throw a ball around.
-TG
I think Obama filed for like 5 mil last year or somewhere around that. Salary of the POTUS is 440k (someone correct me if I'm wrong on that figure) I believe. And he make a ton for any appearance (eg. speaking at some University graduation), plus obviously his books.oVo wrote:Does any athlete deserve $10 million a year? The NFL and it's member teams are a business and all these lucrative contracts are obviously considered good investments into their product.
Is the President of the USA still making $200-$250K a year plus perks?
BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, to explain the price of football players, one should examine the NFLPA's methods of restricting competition, thus keeping prices high. But still, it makes sense that some football players are worth tens of millions because of the potential of profit involved in playing football games, and highly valuable football players tend to be in very, very little supply, thus increasing their price.Army of GOD wrote:I agree, but unless you only watch independent films and such were the actors need another job just to live, then it's kind of hypocritical. Being a football player is a lot harder than acting (I think, I don't know personally though, I just have played football) yet actors make ridiculous amount of money as well. But people, especially football fans, are never going to stop watching games. Just like in the days of the Coliseum, people want to see blood.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
But other than that I couldn't give a f*ck about football. The fact that a player potentially CAN make $100 million by running around on a field seems odd to me. Just goes to show how many of you are getting suckered into paying for tickets, seats, gear, cable t.v., etc. etc. to watch a group of idiots throw a ball around.
-TG
A valid observation, sir.Army of GOD wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, to explain the price of football players, one should examine the NFLPA's methods of restricting competition, thus keeping prices high. But still, it makes sense that some football players are worth tens of millions because of the potential of profit involved in playing football games, and highly valuable football players tend to be in very, very little supply, thus increasing their price.Army of GOD wrote:I agree, but unless you only watch independent films and such were the actors need another job just to live, then it's kind of hypocritical. Being a football player is a lot harder than acting (I think, I don't know personally though, I just have played football) yet actors make ridiculous amount of money as well. But people, especially football fans, are never going to stop watching games. Just like in the days of the Coliseum, people want to see blood.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
But other than that I couldn't give a f*ck about football. The fact that a player potentially CAN make $100 million by running around on a field seems odd to me. Just goes to show how many of you are getting suckered into paying for tickets, seats, gear, cable t.v., etc. etc. to watch a group of idiots throw a ball around.
-TG
Are we arguing or agreeing? I have no problem with what you said.BigBallinStalin wrote:A valid observation, sir.Army of GOD wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Well, to explain the price of football players, one should examine the NFLPA's methods of restricting competition, thus keeping prices high. But still, it makes sense that some football players are worth tens of millions because of the potential of profit involved in playing football games, and highly valuable football players tend to be in very, very little supply, thus increasing their price.Army of GOD wrote:I agree, but unless you only watch independent films and such were the actors need another job just to live, then it's kind of hypocritical. Being a football player is a lot harder than acting (I think, I don't know personally though, I just have played football) yet actors make ridiculous amount of money as well. But people, especially football fans, are never going to stop watching games. Just like in the days of the Coliseum, people want to see blood.TA1LGUNN3R wrote:I suppose whether he "deserves" the money depends on how much business he can bring to the team. Apparently whomever is signing the checks thinks he can bring the win and therefore the revenue, through ticket and merchandise sales, advertising, etc.
I'm sure BBS will back me up here.
But other than that I couldn't give a f*ck about football. The fact that a player potentially CAN make $100 million by running around on a field seems odd to me. Just goes to show how many of you are getting suckered into paying for tickets, seats, gear, cable t.v., etc. etc. to watch a group of idiots throw a ball around.
-TG
The problem is separating the influences such as:
(1) The price set by the labor union
(2) The price of potential supply, given no restrictions by the NFLPA or other laws (e.g. post-high school players being restricted from the market; educational laws that prevent football farms similar to ones used in Europe; etc.)
(3) The value of football skills and knowledge
etc.
Either way, Mike Vick "deserves" his money because given the constraints, his value mostly seems to be influenced by his skills and knowledge of football. The union can set wages, and the union + laws can restrict supply, but that doesn't grant 4th string quarterbacks $100 million. The difference in wages is mostly from the skills and knowledge.
I was just pointing out that because TG doesn't like football, he thinks he's above football fans that support it. Yet he probably supports tv shows, movies, music, etc. where people are being completely over-paid (from mosta blue-or-white-collar workers opinions).BigBallinStalin wrote:If you agree, then we agree.
We're all winners here, AoG.
(I'm just applying the economic way of thinking.)
Come now, dear boy. TG is a lobster-alien, so we shouldn't take seriously his observations of human activities.Army of GOD wrote:I was just pointing out that because TG doesn't like football, he thinks he's above football fans that support it. Yet he probably supports tv shows, movies, music, etc. where people are being completely over-paid (from mosta blue-or-white-collar workers opinions).BigBallinStalin wrote:If you agree, then we agree.
We're all winners here, AoG.
(I'm just applying the economic way of thinking.)
But he also has/is going to get sponsorships (especially if he wins an MVP award/Super Bowl), so that'll help.Night Strike wrote:whitestazn88 wrote:such as free security detail for the rest of his life/quote]
Actually it's only for 10 years after leaving office now. Clinton signed that into law in like 1997 I believe.
On topic, as was mentioned previously, the guaranteed money is only $40 million over the 6 years. Furthermore, I heard on ESPN this morning that Vick still owes creditors $19 million from filing for bankruptcy when he went to jail. So he's not really going to be able to keep all of that money anyway. Just some information to put everything in context.
I generally appreciate watching things that involve at least some form of thinking. That's not to say I don't enjoy sports; I like to play sports irl. But I find watching them incredibly dull.Army of GOD wrote:I was just pointing out that because TG doesn't like football, he thinks he's above football fans that support it. Yet he probably supports tv shows, movies, music, etc. where people are being completely over-paid (from mosta blue-or-white-collar workers opinions).
BBS wrote:Come now, dear boy. TG is a lobster-alien, so we shouldn't take seriously his observations of human activities.
Night Strike wrote:Actually it's only for 10 years after leaving office now. Clinton signed that into law in like 1997 I believe.whitestazn88 wrote:such as free security detail for the rest of his life
On topic, as was mentioned previously, the guaranteed money is only $40 million over the 6 years. Furthermore, I heard on ESPN this morning that Vick still owes creditors $19 million from filing for bankruptcy when he went to jail. So he's not really going to be able to keep all of that money anyway. Just some information to put everything in context.
I'm well aware of this. I'm just saying he's massively in debt.patrickaa317 wrote:Night Strike wrote:Actually it's only for 10 years after leaving office now. Clinton signed that into law in like 1997 I believe.whitestazn88 wrote:such as free security detail for the rest of his life
On topic, as was mentioned previously, the guaranteed money is only $40 million over the 6 years. Furthermore, I heard on ESPN this morning that Vick still owes creditors $19 million from filing for bankruptcy when he went to jail. So he's not really going to be able to keep all of that money anyway. Just some information to put everything in context.
That doesn't change the amount he is getting paid. If I get paid $15 an hour, I get paid $15 an hour. It doesn't matter how much debt I have, my pay remains the same.
If the Eagles didn't offer him his contract, that $19 million would still be out there.
Truth. My wife and I will have a total of about $40,000 of student loan debt when I finish. That's why I want a degree in my field: to be able to pay that debt off as quickly as possible.Symmetry wrote:If you were Michael Vick the amount of debt you had would certainly matter, it being part of what influenced Michael Vick to enter into a contract with the Eagles, and not, say some company offering $15 an hour.
no he should be forced to fight some other dog fighter (or what ever the law is called) to the death and let the dogs watch.neanderpaul14 wrote:He deserves to be in jail. Or better yet he deserves to be dropped into a cage filled with dogs and torn limb from limb. That would be justice.

Are you advocating employers no longer looking at criminal records of their potential employees? Or just in Vick's case?Crazyirishman wrote:I think vick it good just not good enough right now to be a top 3-4 paid quarterback, brees will get his money this or next year, and rodgers in a couple years probably. I think vick as a player is in the 6 year 75 miliion with 30 guaranteed type range. what he did in his personal life years ago should have no bearings on what he gets paid now.
vick would beat the shit out of them.40kguy wrote:no he should be forced to fight some other dog fighter (or what ever the law is called) to the death and let the dogs watch.neanderpaul14 wrote:He deserves to be in jail. Or better yet he deserves to be dropped into a cage filled with dogs and torn limb from limb. That would be justice.
Are you implying that if Michael Vick didn't have the $19 Million debt, he wouldn't have signed the $100 Million contract? I'm pretty sure he would have signed that contract either way. And he definitely deserves it with the talent he has.Symmetry wrote:If you were Michael Vick the amount of debt you had would certainly matter, it being part of what influenced Michael Vick to enter into a contract with the Eagles, and not, say some company offering $15 an hour.