Moderator: Clan Directors
codierose wrote:a missed turn in the decider that cant be good

I agree there was not intent, but it did affect the game. We'll wait on DJ's final decision based on that game, plus the prior violations that were not enforced to the full degree.General Brock II wrote:You believe that we intended for Papaj to miss? HAH! That's kind of funny... Too bad we don't work that way, murphy. Nor do we rant against our opponents once loss is eminent.
12 hour Fog of War courtesy rule applies (unless otherwise agreed by both clans).
GG have violated the rule (where applicable to the map) 7 times in team games:If rules are contravened, then the Tournament Organisers may determine that the offending team cannot score any victories from games concerned. If it is concluded that the offending clan have deliberately contravened rules to gain an advantage then the games concernd will be ruled as automatic victories for their opponents.
DJ Teflon wrote: This all came about from a discussion about deadbeating - which looks to be unintentional and therefore not a rule voiation in itself.
That pretty much summed it up, alt.alt1978 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm following the conversation here...is aod making the argument that GG is gaining a strategic advantage from missing turns in a no spoils game and is trying to have the results of those games overturned? Or I am I completely off here and not following the jist of this conversation?

You are right in the facts of the conversation.alt1978 wrote:I'm not sure that I'm following the conversation here...is aod making the argument that GG is gaining a strategic advantage from missing turns in a no spoils game and is trying to have the results of those games overturned? Or I am I completely off here and not following the jist of this conversation?
And to be fair, I violated the FOW rules in Game 9703297 and I promptly corrected the situation by shedding light on it in chat, plus let the clock run out and did not deploy any troops.DJ Teflon wrote:Violation of FOW rule.
12 hour Fog of War courtesy rule applies (unless otherwise agreed by both clans).GG have violated the rule (where applicable to the map) 7 times in team games:If rules are contravened, then the Tournament Organisers may determine that the offending team cannot score any victories from games concerned. If it is concluded that the offending clan have deliberately contravened rules to gain an advantage then the games concernd will be ruled as automatic victories for their opponents.
Game 9718975 AOD Won anyway
Game 9734213 GG close to winning
Game 9703281 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703284 - GG won
Game 9703286 - GG won
Game 9703288 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703292 - AOD Won anyway
This effectively means GG lose 4 points, and thereby hands the tie to GG - a sad end but rules are rules.
The first thread also states that clans can come to a mutual agreement about such things, but I cant see a solution as AOD have won the tie-breaker anyway.
This all came about from a discussion about deadbeating - which looks to be unintentional and therefore not a rule voiation in itself.
kennys777 wrote:Violation of FOW rule.
And to be fair, I violated the FOW rules in Game 9703297 and I promptly corrected the situation by shedding light on it in chat, plus let the clock run out and did not deploy any troops.

Baby-Bjorn wrote:Papaj did not intentionally deadbeat. Life happens and people miss turns. Yes it was a Poker Club game [which in my opinion is still a no spoils game], but since he did not intentionally deadbeat, no penalty or award should be given.
This was our first war using the 12 hour rule and there was a lot of confusion about it among our members. Many did not know what is was. When the problem surfaced, I took the lead on this and began informing our members what the rule was and how to apply it. I do not think there were any violations after I informed our members.
The violations in question were either obviated by AOD winning the games anyway [and thus no award or penalty should be given], or honest mistakes. I know the members who violated the rule and they are all honest, straightforward people. The violations were honest mistakes or misunderstanding of the rule. Therefore, no penalty or award should be given.
kennys777 wrote:Violation of FOW rule.
And to be fair, I violated the FOW rules in Game 9703297 and I promptly corrected the situation by shedding light on it in chat, plus let the clock run out and did not deploy any troops.
And in this game, Agent 86 then applied the 12 hour rule to his turn and waited before taking his turn. I think that demonstrates the honesty and integrity that is prevalent in our membership.
DJ Teflon wrote:Violation of FOW rule.
12 hour Fog of War courtesy rule applies (unless otherwise agreed by both clans).GG have violated the rule (where applicable to the map) 7 times in team games:If rules are contravened, then the Tournament Organisers may determine that the offending team cannot score any victories from games concerned. If it is concluded that the offending clan have deliberately contravened rules to gain an advantage then the games concernd will be ruled as automatic victories for their opponents.
Game 9718975 AOD Won anyway
Game 9734213 GG close to winning
Game 9703281 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703284 - GG won
Game 9703286 - GG won
Game 9703288 - AOD Won anyway
Game 9703292 - AOD Won anyway
This effectively means GG lose 4 points, and thereby hands the tie to GG - a sad end but rules are rules.
The first thread also states that clans can come to a mutual agreement about such things, but I cant see a solution as AOD have won the tie-breaker anyway.
This all came about from a discussion about deadbeating - which looks to be unintentional and therefore not a rule voiation in itself.
is this not the round 2 did you not use the 12 hour fog rule then ??Baby-Bjorn wrote:This was our first war using the 12 hour rule and there was a lot of confusion about it among our members. Many did not know what is was.
If this is current does this mean your proposing another tie-breaker, or we still lose because AOD won the origianl tie break?DJ Teflon wrote:CORRECTION :
The FOW Rule breach is only relevent in this game:
Game 9703284
This means GG lose 1 point, making the score 22-22.
![]()

Something this generic will be left to interpretations.12 hour Fog of War courtesy rule applies (unless otherwise agreed by both clans).

We have been noting it in almost every game it happened in. Oddly enough, mostly games with AgentSmith88, so he was very vocal about it.Ickyketseddie wrote:I'm not going to get into details with you guys but if you were going to apply penalties for 12H rule violations that happened at the start of the war why wasn't the score updated or wasn't it dealt with untill now? Surely it should have been dealt with at the time, as with the singles match we posted too late. Ruling was given immidiately (we could not gain a point but AOD could if they won).