Moderator: Community Team
White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..
White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..
thenobodies80 wrote:If explain the difference is really hard you can use also a screenshot for each difference. I can suggest gyazo, it allows you to click and grab just a part of the screen, in this case the part where you spot the difference
Hope it helps.
About the difficulty, the two final rounds will be a bit more harder
Nobodies
CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!
DiM wrote:CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!
except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.
betiko wrote:I ll be more than happy if we are plenty to find the 25, it seems like a problem for you!
DiM wrote:except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.
koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1. Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.
DiM wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1. Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.
i agree that nice graphics don't make a map but i'm lost as to which one of them has nice graphics because they're both absolutely bland and simple. in fact classic actually looks very blurry to me so i'd put world 2.1 a little in front in the graphics race.
Rodion wrote:Conquer 4 was overwhelmingly harder than the other 2 combined, but I should be 15/15 as of now!
drunkmonkey wrote:There were 5 changes, not 6. If you count that one as 2 different changes, then there's another one you have to count as 6 different changes. You're just upset because you missed one, and looking for someone to blame.
danfrank wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:There were 5 changes, not 6. If you count that one as 2 different changes, then there's another one you have to count as 6 different changes. You're just upset because you missed one, and looking for someone to blame.
actually not the equals 4 stands alone the equals 6 bonus with the dots modified also stands alone to suggest that would count as six is ignorant.. if CONTROVERSY WASN`T INTENDEDthan changing only 1 equal 4 would have been sufficient..
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users