Moderator: Community Team

The Lions have the best chance of preventing that by virtue of having two games against the Pack. The Giants and the Bears are the only other teams I'd say have a good shot at it.QoH wrote:Who thinks the Packers will go 16-0 plus win the superbowl?? The Pack is almost already 16-0 if you count form when they last lost back in last season...
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
The packers definitely have the talent to, but they tend to have at least 1 screw up game and lose to a ridiculous team, (TB 2 years ago, dolphins/redskins last year), so I highly doubt they will do it. Especially unlikely because of the 2 lions and bears game left as well, and the fact the defense has not looked good.pancakemix wrote:The Lions have the best chance of preventing that by virtue of having two games against the Pack. The Giants and the Bears are the only other teams I'd say have a good shot at it.QoH wrote:Who thinks the Packers will go 16-0 plus win the superbowl?? The Pack is almost already 16-0 if you count form when they last lost back in last season...

New England? I used to have dislike for them back when we would compete against them in the playoffs and such, but I don't care that much. Every week I expect both Oakland and San Diego to lose. I don't hate KC as much.Crazyirishman wrote:9-5 this week 61-26 overall still hovering around 70%. didnt see it the first week and forgot a couple others. Also I have a personal policy New England and Oakland should always lose and Denver should always win which brings me down a little as of now.
well all I hear since I moved out here is how awesome they are, along with the abundance of sunshine that is blown up the patriots asses. I have a personal campaign where I compare the Pats to where the Broncos were in the mid 90's and how they're about 3 seasons away from 4-12. Bellichick and shannahan are like fucking twins when it comes to how they act. Also Brady is a cry baby, I lost all respect for him after the Ravens game a couple years back when he cried the ref for a flag when the lineman pushed the defender near his knees, thats the game where Ray told him ot take off the dress.Army of GOD wrote:New England? I used to have dislike for them back when we would compete against them in the playoffs and such, but I don't care that much. Every week I expect both Oakland and San Diego to lose. I don't hate KC as much.Crazyirishman wrote:9-5 this week 61-26 overall still hovering around 70%. didnt see it the first week and forgot a couple others. Also I have a personal policy New England and Oakland should always lose and Denver should always win which brings me down a little as of now.
That's not a bad record, Safari. I once entered something like that for the NHL, but I don't have the time, any more... It's always fun, though.safariguy5 wrote:9-4, I'm playing Pick-em on Yahoo, so my record overall is 85-44.safariguy5 wrote:Week 9
NYJ @ BUF Defense locks down that Buffalo spread
SEA @ DAL
CLE @ HOU
ATL @ IND
MIA @ KC
TB @ NO Fluke last week, doesn't happen again
SF @ WAS
DEN @ OAK
CIN @ TEN Where's CJ2K?
STL @ ARI
NYG @ NE
GB @ SD
BAL @ PIT Avenge the blowout
CHI @ PHI
I have to say, it's a lot easier because the default Yahoo scoring for NFL games does not include the spread. So straight up victories is much easier to pick.General Brock II wrote:That's not a bad record, Safari. I once entered something like that for the NHL, but I don't have the time, any more... It's always fun, though.safariguy5 wrote:9-4, I'm playing Pick-em on Yahoo, so my record overall is 85-44.safariguy5 wrote:Week 9
NYJ @ BUF Defense locks down that Buffalo spread
SEA @ DAL
CLE @ HOU
ATL @ IND
MIA @ KC
TB @ NO Fluke last week, doesn't happen again
SF @ WAS
DEN @ OAK
CIN @ TEN Where's CJ2K?
STL @ ARI
NYG @ NE
GB @ SD
BAL @ PIT Avenge the blowout
CHI @ PHI
and with Chicago's win, that puts me at 10 - 4! Hurrah! A veeeery good Sunday for me.

Last year they had a supposedly relevant artist and it was awful. Who would you prefer? Lady Gaga?Army of GOD wrote:Saw this bit on the Daily Show and lol'd hard: http://www.starpulse.com/news/Kevin_Bla ... ans_want_n
An even worse tragedy is how the Super Bowl is a showcase for aging/past-their-prime artists...can't wait to listen to Madonna have shit come out of her mouth during halftime of the Super Bowl. Why can't they get a relevant band/artist?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
That's for certain. That was embarassing for the entire league.oVo wrote:I hadn't heard Madonna was this season's halftime,
but last years Peas won't be hard to top.
Black Eyed Peas are in no way relevant. 10 years ago, yes, but they're done now.pancakemix wrote:Last year they had a supposedly relevant artist and it was awful. Who would you prefer? Lady Gaga?Army of GOD wrote:Saw this bit on the Daily Show and lol'd hard: http://www.starpulse.com/news/Kevin_Bla ... ans_want_n
An even worse tragedy is how the Super Bowl is a showcase for aging/past-their-prime artists...can't wait to listen to Madonna have shit come out of her mouth during halftime of the Super Bowl. Why can't they get a relevant band/artist?
Adele is out for sure, she had throat surgery recently.General Brock II wrote:That's for certain. That was embarassing for the entire league.oVo wrote:I hadn't heard Madonna was this season's halftime,
but last years Peas won't be hard to top.Madonna might be, as well. Aside from pop culture, what message is the NFL sending to the children and fans when it nominates the most controversial singer of the '90s? Lady Gaga would be just as bad.
How about young talent? There's quite a bit of it, and I reckon that a good portion of the States would accept somebody like Taylor Swift, Katie Perry, Luke Bryan, Lady Antebellum, Rihanna or Adele? Or for those of you Glee fans, how about a Glee cast set? lol I've seen one or two songs (though I don't approve of the show), and they're pretty smashing.


safariguy5 wrote: Denver @ Kansas City Chiefs study the game tape, won't get fooled by option

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
I would be content with any of these three: GB/NYG, Det/NO or Cin/Pitpancakemix wrote: Incidentally, what game does everyone think will replace the flexed IND @ NE for Sunday night in Week 13? My money's on DET @ NO.
Atlanta @ Houston should be good. A shootout is always entertaining.Army of GOD wrote:I would be content with any of these three: GB/NYG, Det/NO or Cin/Pitpancakemix wrote: Incidentally, what game does everyone think will replace the flexed IND @ NE for Sunday night in Week 13? My money's on DET @ NO.
That's assuming Cincinatti is still good by then.

Good call, Safari.safariguy5 wrote:Thursday Night game, best get the picks out early.
Week 10
Oakland @ San Diego
Denver @ Kansas City Chiefs study the game tape, won't get fooled by option
Jacksonville @ Indianapolis More a commentary on how bad the Colts are, also losing Dallas Clark
New Orleans @ Atlanta
Houston @ Tampa Bay
Pittsburgh @ Cincinnati Backs against the wall playoff wise, Tomlin motivates the D
Tennessee @ Carolina
Arizona @ Philadelphia
Buffalo @ Dallas
St. Louis @ Cleveland
Washington @ Miami
Baltimore @ Seattle
NY Giants @ San Francisco
Detroit @ Chicago
New England @ NY Jets Brady can't throw on Revis, secondary
Minnesota @ Green Bay
It's hard to get a good grasp of either team, since they have both proven to be inconsistent (and for years too). My gut feeling is though that Rivers won't have as bad as a night as he has had in the past, interception wise, especially because Oakland's defense is pretty middle of the pack.oVo wrote:I think Carson Palmer is acclimating to the Oakland offense, but haven't heard if McFadden is available to play, so I'm giving the nod to the home team. There's also the 100+ yards of penalties the Silver & Black gave away against the Broncos last Sunday to consider.
Chargers over the Raiders.