barackattack wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:the banks
As we said earlier, the banks only own a fraction of government debt.Baron Von PWN wrote: If I lend money to a guy who I know never pays off his debts that's my bad, buddy while still an idiot didn't force me to lend him money.
This wasn't the case. Let's take Greece as a proxy for any struggling government:
Pre-recession Greece had a strong economy, with notably strong tourism and shipping industries. These were shattered by the recession, dealing a blow to Greece. Greece held assets in US banks, which the recession dealt great damage to. Greece has had to bail out its banks, which was an unprecedented and high cost. Pre-recession, Greece was just as sound an investment as anyone else - of course 'the banks' would lend to them. It is only since the economic slowdown that Greece has experienced any major problems.
Greece was highly susceptible to any aftershocks from the global economy. That's not having a strong economy if its government is on the verge of collapsing from a recession in the US. Their government is the source of its problems because after getting on the Euro, the Greek government could borrow money at lower interest rates because on paper Greece had the good, economic requirements which the EU demands.
The truth was that Greece actually didn't meet the requirements because Greece was great at cooking its books. Additionally, the EU rules aren't really enforced (see debt-to-GDP ratios in Italy, Spain, Ireland, Portugal, and others, and see economic growth rates for these countries). Many failed to meet these requirements, but not much was really done about it, so it made sense to continue borrowing.
Besides, if your in power in the Greek government, and you have access to funds that will increase your political party's power in the short-run, then you'd be a fool not to borrow money, create bureaucracies, load in your supporters, and spend spend spend on other social welfare programs to indirectly purchase votes.
The party continued until a small storm blew away Greece's dress, and when people sobered up, they realized she was a huge, gross, butt-ugly, fat chick with a bad personality. As the country's economic growth rate decreased, commercial banks--mainly in Germany and France--dumped plenty in Greek bonds with the expectation that the Greek economy would rebound, so they'd make a handsome profit. The economy didn't, and fearing an economic downturn within Germany and France (from shitty bank decisions on extremely risky investments), they essentially bailed out Greece (but in actuality, they bailed out their own commercial banks).
This then creates the bad incentives for commercial banks to continue making risky investments, because hey, the government will have their backs. These countries have federally insured bank deposit accounts, so the vast majority of people don't lose money--assuming the banks fail, which might not happen (and with the underlying, imagined assumption that the domestic economy would be terrible terrible terrible if banks weren't bailed out, but no one really knows. It's a slippery slope argument).

















































