Moderator: Community Team
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
XenHu wrote::shock:
Three deaths hmm?
I personally see the layout as one family+vig+serial killer.
Serial killer's dead now, so if one of the other kills was made by a vig, EASY! We didn't have much to go on Day 1 outside of Panicker, so I'm going to go and look back and see who was opposed to his lynching.
-X
Puff wrote:ok there has been a hell of a lot of voting so I am going to vote sysygy and see where we go from there
Syzygy wrote:Puff wrote:ok there has been a hell of a lot of voting so I am going to vote sysygy and see where we go from there
And I am going to ask, why Syzygy?
mandalorian2298 wrote:panicker wrote:Fircoal wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:So are you implying that you are a cop, Fircoal?
No, I'm implying I have mafia skilz.
wow such a blatent confession
UNVOTE:SENFIVE
VOTE:FIRCOAL
unvote
vote panicker for bandwagoning.
Senfive wrote:From what I read Fircoal made 2 stupid stupid mistakes.
1.)Fircoal wrote:Oh, good it's better to have idiots than good mafia hunters.
This is dumb cause it implys that he is non town and wants idiots so he lives to pick others off.
2.) Paniker picked up on it by changing his vote with this quote.panicker wrote:Fircoal wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:So are you implying that you are a cop, Fircoal?
No, I'm implying I have mafia skilz.
wow such a blatent confession
UNVOTE:SENFIVE
VOTE:FIRCOAL
I do not believe that Panicker was bandwagoning in anyway. He stated facts and voted unlike other scummy people after him. *cough* anark *cough*
Fircoal dug himself a hole and I want an explination as to why you would say those retarded things if you were a townie? Maybe I could give you some ridalin.
Senfive wrote:People are taking way too much offense to my arguments and I didn't once FOS anyone or vote them. Pointed out there scumminess and they both FOS me and call me names. If you have half a brain you will see my arguments aren't flawed here.
Fircoal wrote:I don't consider your argument offensive, I find it flawed.
The1exile wrote:Senfive wrote:People are taking way too much offense to my arguments and I didn't once FOS anyone or vote them. Pointed out there scumminess and they both FOS me and call me names. If you have half a brain you will see my arguments aren't flawed here.
They are, though. 1) you can't understand sarcasm (though this uis not neccesarily scummy in your case). 2) ppanicker didn't state facts, he said "wow what a blatent confession", showing he totally misread the post.
Yes, Fircoal says stupid things when he's townie to lighten the mood, but conversely, he's far too good a mafia (the GAME) player to be casght out by saying something like "I'm mafia" (or other similarly obvious statement.
Senfive wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:Unvote
Vote: panicker
If you guys aren't right, I'm going back to my original theory.
Way to throw out a crap logic statement to cover your ass.
That way if someone says well you voted for him also, you can say it wasn't your idea. Why not stick to your own theory's? I am really not liking the stench of scum that you wreak of. Maybe a nice soothing bath and plenty of bed rest will clear that right up.
Puff wrote:I see what people are voting paniker for.
Which looks very scummy in my books Vote paniker
reverend_kyle wrote:I may be in the minority, but I find the people voting panicker alot more scummy than the people voting fircoal. It seems they are desperately starting a bandwagon to take eyes off fircoal and doing it in an almost desperate manner
oh and unvote manbearpig
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
XenHu wrote:Mandy my friend, RK is dead..
![]()
Methinks you need a new pair of glasses.
-X
Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Aimless wrote:Guys, with Syzygy's vote we are at Lynch -1 on panicker.
No one drop the hammer on panicker until we hear his roleclaim. Panicker, if you are town, roleclaim please.
The rest of you - we have some time before the deadline; we do not need a lynch for the sake of getting a lynch. Especially if panicker turns out to be the doc or cop.
jnd94 wrote:eh wat the hell, might as well lynch before there is a no-lynch
vote- Panicker
spiesr wrote:Aimless wrote:Guys, with Syzygy's vote we are at Lynch -1 on panicker.
No one drop the hammer on panicker until we hear his roleclaim. Panicker, if you are town, roleclaim please.
The rest of you - we have some time before the deadline; we do not need a lynch for the sake of getting a lynch. Especially if panicker turns out to be the doc or cop.
Followed by...jnd94 wrote:eh wat the hell, might as well lynch before there is a no-lynch
vote- Panicker
?
spiesr wrote:jnd94 wrote:eh wat the hell, might as well lynch before there is a no-lynch
vote- Panicker
?
viperbitex wrote: what the f*ck were the dinosaurs all about?? Did G-Dog wear his silly pants one day 10 million years ago and make them??
autoload wrote:Or attribute it to a mafia member knowing that one of his own is getting lynched and decides to hammer him to look more townish?
autoload wrote:spiesr wrote:Aimless wrote:Guys, with Syzygy's vote we are at Lynch -1 on panicker.
No one drop the hammer on panicker until we hear his roleclaim. Panicker, if you are town, roleclaim please.
The rest of you - we have some time before the deadline; we do not need a lynch for the sake of getting a lynch. Especially if panicker turns out to be the doc or cop.
Followed by...jnd94 wrote:eh wat the hell, might as well lynch before there is a no-lynch
vote- Panicker
?
I also found this suspicious...
Vote: jnd94
Users browsing this forum: No registered users