Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:pardon my noobishness again; but can you explain what does a mafia godfather do?
his power is that he always turns out cleared when he is investigated? he got other powers as well?
is there a mafia godfather in every game?
betiko wrote:pardon my noobishness again; but can you explain what does a mafia godfather do?
his power is that he always turns out cleared when he is investigated? he got other powers as well?
is there a mafia godfather in every game?
trinicardinal wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Swifte wrote:Why exactly is it to our advantage to potentially detonate a townie bomb with what will most likely also be a townie (-2 townies with night coming = -3 townies)? Just hoping to get info about who absolutely wouldn't hammer, which could equally as well be a town power role or a mafia? Why do that, when we can investigate the bomb to verify and hopefully only lose 1 townie over night and either have a guaranteed target or at least a solid claim with some suspects? Why the eagerness to blow up (for lack of a better phrase) the whole game right now?
With no deadline, we even could choose to believe the bomb claim for now and pick another case without risking two town at once. Are we really making the best play here?
I think we are better to deal with this today. If we leave it to night for Rodion to be investigated and he is town the mafia could interfere with the investigation(if they have a framer or something). So I think it will be best to get this over with today or we will be in the same boat tomorrow.betiko wrote:also dazza is not very active on day 2 i think.
In what way have I not been active???
There is another possibility that I have not seen - what if Rodion is Mafia Godfather and this is indeed a fake claim (safe or otherwise)... correct me if I'm wrong here but - investigation would show him as town and we would likely then accept his claim and which would then put him in a position where he is not going to get killed at night and not lynched during the day, giving mafia an extremely strong position (if he is indeed Godfather)
I'm not saying we definitely need to lynch immediately or at all but it is definitely something to think about and keep in mind.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
betiko wrote:
FOS mob; can you explain me what made you change your mind in the last couple of hours about not putting someone at l-1 before he claims??
MeDeFe wrote:(5 new pages later...) (and 2 posts while writing this)
ok... If Rodion is town only a townie would hammer him at this point. I don't think scum would take the chance of betting on him being a fakeclaiming townie. The loss is potentially too great and safari has included bombs in his games before, there's precedence.
If he is scum they were unlikely to kill him anyway, though sacrificing a goon to "clear" a more powerful scum member is a useful strategy at times. What makes that unlikely at this point is that we have too many people who are being suspected in this game, there's no reason to make a scum member seem townish since there are so many potential cases around, some of them are bound to be on townies and all that's needed is to gently press for those rather than for any potential cases on scum members.
Then again, as betiko noted earlier, as fakeclaims go bomb may well be the best there is. This is especially true if you're an enabling role, like the godfather is in some variants, and have to do your damnedest to stay alive. Noone will want to target you with a kill and you show up as innocent.
I'm not fully convinced that you're telling us the truth about your role, but I think there's a possiblity of a busdriver being in the game as well, and whether you're really a bomb or a fakeclaiming godfather, the busdriver has the potential to screw over the scum after your claim either way. I'd advocate for keeping you alive for now.
unvote
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
MeDeFe wrote:ok... If Rodion is town only a townie would hammer him at this point. I don't think scum would take the chance of betting on him being a fakeclaiming townie. The loss is potentially too great and safari has included bombs in his games before, there's precedence.
MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
Rodion wrote:Jonty, being sick is understadable, but your Dec 3rd post had to adress mine, didn't it? The way it happened, it seems like you got to "sneak" a poorly motivated vote and you wouldn't have ever adressed anything if I had not called you out today.
So, did you discard your former reason and just came up with a new one or is this the original reasoning? I don't see your latest post saying anything about me trying to delay town. Ironically, if Jim is a cop and you think I'm mafia, why would I delay his wagon?jonty125 wrote:I never said it was "set in stone", I said you tried to sell it as a geniune case when it wasn't you should never have to revert to your 'case'
EBWOP "set in stone" section I pressed submit not previewjonty wrote:You made a shocking case against strike I thought to myself - what the hell is he doing? After many moments thought I came up with your scum trying to delay us (rubbish, I know). So I voted you for your poor logic in your case against strike and selling it as "set in stone" ← Does this clarify
Oh, you didn't?
Strike, it felt like you wouldn't unvote, but your post was still too "on the fence". Your latest one is much better and clearer. Thank you.
Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
trinicardinal wrote:Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,
fastposted by 2 people.
MoB Deadly wrote:Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
I know Strike has said more than once chap would do it, but didn't chap say he would before Rodion's claim? I thought that was part of Strike's defense on why he shouldn't do it. I don't know when chap said it that's why, if he did volunteer after the claim I am all for it.
chapcrap wrote:Rodion wrote:Clown with the Tear-Away Face, town bomb.
That said, I'll probably want either Strike or Chap to be the hammer (so unvote, let someone else L-1 and then hammer). I'll know for sure after I get to interrogate Jonty some more and possibly hear input from some quiet people (Shield, Leitz, Swifte come to mind).
I'll hammer if you would like. I have nothing to lose. Although if your claim is true, it sucks that we are going to lose two town.
Can we get a vote count and a clarification on the deadline?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is
b. We need the busdriver for the doctor.
trinicardinal wrote:Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,
fastposted by 2 people.
MoB Deadly wrote:trinicardinal wrote:Swifte wrote:MoB Deadly wrote:I think Dazza should hammer Rodion. Dazza volunteered to do it, and I don't think we can get around not lynching Rodion. Rodion is a good player (and has lots of experience playing as scum). He has good fake claims, regardless if they are provided or not.
Wondering why Dazza instead of chap, chap volunteered first. Any particular reason for dazza to do it?
and why are you anxious for us to lose what is likely to be 2 townies? As was stated no scum is going to hammer. so we'll just be down 2 townies for the effort,
fastposted by 2 people.
because I can't help but think Rodion is lying. Its the perfect claim for the game right now, almost too perfect, and I don't think its a coincidence. I think I need to do research on the games where Rodion is scum and try to find his claims. Dont have time at the moment though.
I am certainly not anxious to vote, but right now I am convinced it is the right thing to do eventually. Is it worth to reaffirm it with a cop investigation, which will still be partially WIFOM with the mafia knowing an investigation on him is imminent.
This is the first time I've faced a bomb claim, I am honestly fairly unsure what the best thing to do is here.
Rodion wrote:Trini, I think you're misinterpreting Swifte (or were you talking to Mob?). He's not trying to force Chap to hammer, he is just interested in knowing why Mob would rather have Dazza hammer instead of Chap. Swifte's thoughts on the situation were already given in his penultimate post and you can clearly tell he is not anxious at all.
strike wolf wrote:The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is a. With the bomb known the mafia know a potential way around this and b. We need the busdriver for the doctor. Any secondary protective (or watcher) roles should still be placed on swifte just in case.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:strike wolf wrote:The problem with the busdriver driving the bomb is a. With the bomb known the mafia know a potential way around this and b. We need the busdriver for the doctor. Any secondary protective (or watcher) roles should still be placed on swifte just in case.
Regarding a, the busdriver (if there is one) knows the scum know this, and the scum know that the busdriver knows this as well, and so it goes. There might not even be a busdriver, in which case the scum may end up killing their fakeclaiming godfather because they thought he'd be busdriven and therefor safe to target.
It's exactly the same thing with the doctor, really, the scum may actively be avoiding targeting the doc because they assume he's being busdriven or watched, and the busdriver and/or watcher may be going for completely different targets because they know the mafia may not even be targeting the doc.
So there isn't just wine but a whole assortment of beverages in front of them because there's the safe way of playing the game, and then there are the crazy things people actually do.
And fastposted about 8 or 10 times... But this goes for what Rodion wrote as well. There's simply too much wine on the table to make any good predictions about who's going to switch who and who'll watch or protect whom.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users