Conquer Club

Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Chewie1 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:51 am

After finding out about the latest Battle Royals just over a week ago I was excited about finally getting a chance to play them (I even set my alarm for 5 oclock in the morning to get in on the first ones)

But after playing 10 or so games I was left let down by the experience. Because all the games HAVE to be played freestyle, as my internet connection is slower than most, In freestyle I generally run around 10 seconds behind. Despite continuosly hitting refresh I got eliminated in several without getting the chance to deploy. By point collectors not players trying to win the game ( yes you Eternal Shadow,,,3 games when u then got eliminated yourself next round as you left yourself to weak to gain a few precious points) All terminator games.
But then In games I made it past the point whores it was the usual players you see playing freestyle sweep the board, not because they are neccesary good players but because they have fast internet.
Obviously if the games were srandard you would still get the point collectors hitting in the first round for points but when all this was out the way the better players could use strategy not internet speed.

Maybe all this is what Battle Royals have been like in the past but as this was my first time playing I thought it would be a better experience.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Chewie1
 
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:03 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby angola on Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:00 am

A standard game with 2 minute rounds wouldn't take all that long, frankly.
Highest rank: 48th. Highest score: 3,384. Feb. 9, 2014.
Captain angola
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Washington state

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby angola on Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:03 am

As an aside, I'm enjoying the games so far and I suck at freestyle.
Highest rank: 48th. Highest score: 3,384. Feb. 9, 2014.
Captain angola
 
Posts: 2076
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 12:56 pm
Location: Washington state

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby King_Herpes on Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:08 am

Sorry about your ungrateful little butt
Sorry about your little butt ✪ Dumb fucking e-lambs the lot of you
Image
User avatar
Brigadier King_Herpes
 
Posts: 1745
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 6:57 pm
Location: The epidermis my nermis
23

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Chewie1 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:14 am

King_Herpes wrote:Sorry about your ungrateful little butt


Lol not ungrateful I appreciate everyting that CC admin and mods do.... but just expected something for everyone.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Chewie1
 
Posts: 1201
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:03 pm
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby rdsrds2120 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 4:18 am

Chewie1 wrote:
King_Herpes wrote:Sorry about your ungrateful little butt


Lol not ungrateful I appreciate everyting that CC admin and mods do.... but just expected something for everyone.


We understand, but it's hard to GUARANTEE that the game won't last forever, and we really don't want people to sit behind their screen...bored...for hours..in one game. Heck, it happened last year in a freestyle speed game! The game took 2 hours!

As an attempt to compensate for this, there are some sequential, casual BR's after the event is finished, be sure to hear more about those in the following day or so!

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby greenoaks on Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:10 am

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Chewie1 wrote:
King_Herpes wrote:Sorry about your ungrateful little butt


Lol not ungrateful I appreciate everyting that CC admin and mods do.... but just expected something for everyone.


We understand, but it's hard to GUARANTEE that the game won't last forever, and we really don't want people to sit behind their screen...bored...for hours..in one game. Heck, it happened last year in a freestyle speed game! The game took 2 hours!

As an attempt to compensate for this, there are some sequential, casual BR's after the event is finished, be sure to hear more about those in the following day or so!

-rd

i too have a really slow internet speed and have not participated in the birthday celebrations because of it. how about putting some sequential BR's up now for us to feel a part of the party.
User avatar
Sergeant greenoaks
 
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Gilligan on Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:37 am

Sequential speed would take a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle too long ;)
Image
User avatar
Captain Gilligan
 
Posts: 12478
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 4:59 pm
Location: Providence, RI

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby SirSebstar on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:00 am

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Chewie1 wrote:
King_Herpes wrote:Sorry about your ungrateful little butt


Lol not ungrateful I appreciate everyting that CC admin and mods do.... but just expected something for everyone.


We understand, but it's hard to GUARANTEE that the game won't last forever, and we really don't want people to sit behind their screen...bored...for hours..in one game. Heck, it happened last year in a freestyle speed game! The game took 2 hours!

As an attempt to compensate for this, there are some sequential, casual BR's after the event is finished, be sure to hear more about those in the following day or so!

-rd


YEA!!!!
Image
User avatar
Major SirSebstar
 
Posts: 6969
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:51 am
Location: SirSebstar is BACK. Highscore: Colonel Score: 2919 21/03/2011

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:29 am

A few non-speed and non-freestyle games may be created towards the end of the event.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby VOC on Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:11 am

won 2 out of 4 thnx!!!!
User avatar
Major VOC
 
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 8:14 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby zimmah on Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:13 am

nice i'll try to join at least 1 of those. :)
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby zimmah on Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:16 am

VOC wrote:won 2 out of 4 thnx!!!!



mazzelpik
Click image to enlarge.
image
User avatar
Major zimmah
 
Posts: 1652
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: VDLL

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Agent 86 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:59 am

Hope those sequential games come up soon..absolutely impossible for me to play freestyle from China..couldn't even get a turn in the first one I tried and that was my battle royal experience for good if they are freestyle. By the way it's now Tuesday early morning, so it looks like my battle royals will never eventuate, they will be posted when I'm fast asleep. Good night all and enjoy if you have fast internet :lol:

86
Image
We are the Fallen, an unstoppable wave of Darkness.
User avatar
Major Agent 86
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 6:15 pm
Location: Cone of silence

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:00 pm

angola wrote:A standard game with 2 minute rounds wouldn't take all that long, frankly.

Exactly.

Gilligan wrote:Sequential speed would take a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle too long ;)


Under 3 hours even on a really big map, by my calculations. Under 1 hour on some of the smaller ones. For some people that's a long time, but for most it isn't.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28048
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby blakebowling on Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:22 pm

Dukasaur wrote:
angola wrote:A standard game with 2 minute rounds wouldn't take all that long, frankly.

Exactly.

Gilligan wrote:Sequential speed would take a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle too long ;)


Under 3 hours even on a really big map, by my calculations. Under 1 hour on some of the smaller ones. For some people that's a long time, but for most it isn't.

Your calculations are way off.

In order for a doodle seq br to end in under an hour, each player would have to take <40 seconds for their turn, and the game would have to end in 5 rounds.
Private blakebowling
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:09 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby HighlanderAttack on Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:39 pm

I too think seq should be added--If players are willing to spend the time --give it to them. I experienced the same issues from the past with a slow pc and slow internet--luckily this year--one game and one win as I do have faster of the both needed to win. Give them sequential and they will come.
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Lieutenant HighlanderAttack
 
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby IcePack on Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:56 pm

I would much prefer a sequential game. and some non-terminator games....
Image

fac vitam incredibilem memento vivere
Knowledge Weighs Nothing, Carry All You Can
Captain IcePack
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 16795
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 6:42 pm
Location: California

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby HighlanderAttack on Mon Jan 02, 2012 3:54 pm

IcePack wrote:I would much prefer a sequential game. and some non-terminator games....



I was in a standard esc freestyle game and it was really fun--lasted about ten minutes for me but it was fun while it lasted
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Lieutenant HighlanderAttack
 
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Dukasaur on Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:45 pm

blakebowling wrote:
Dukasaur wrote:
angola wrote:A standard game with 2 minute rounds wouldn't take all that long, frankly.

Exactly.

Gilligan wrote:Sequential speed would take a liiiiiiiiiiiiiiittle too long ;)


Under 3 hours even on a really big map, by my calculations. Under 1 hour on some of the smaller ones. For some people that's a long time, but for most it isn't.

Your calculations are way off.

In order for a doodle seq br to end in under an hour, each player would have to take <40 seconds for their turn, and the game would have to end in 5 rounds.

For the benefit of those who can't see our private discussion, I bring the public part of my answer:
Dukasaur wrote:You're assuming that the game would go twenty rounds with all the players intact, which is incredibly unlikely. Assuming escalating spoils, the killing begins as soon as there are enough cards in play to make mid-turn cashes a reasonable possibility. In a four-player game, that 11 or 12 rounds, in a five-player game that's about 10 or 11 rounds, in a six-player game it's about 9 or 10 rounds, and so on. I run a lot of seven- and eight-player games; they rarely get into double digits. The more players, the sooner the killing starts. Game Ten Million, with 50 players, ended today early in round 4. (And no, I didn't win; another good reason for me to be bitchy.)

If these games go into the double digits, it's with only two or three survivors of the original field. That's about the only way an escalating game continues: if two or three survivors have not enough power to kill each other. But at that point it's no longer a BR; it's just a two-or-three player game.

Now we had this debate a year ago, I thought people understood my point. How many times will I have to prove it? I thought that's why we tried game Ten Million as sequential, to see if it really would last forever, and of course it didn't. With 24-hour turns, it went less than two months. Two minutes is 1/720th of 24 hours, so if a sequential BR with 24 hour turns lasts less than two months, it's reasonable to assume that the same game with 2-minute turns would last two hours; for sure not more than 3.
“‎Life is a shipwreck, but we must not forget to sing in the lifeboats.”
― Voltaire
User avatar
Sergeant Dukasaur
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 28048
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: Beautiful Niagara
32

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Crazyirishman on Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:02 pm

I cant wait for the person who wants this to sits at the computer for an hour waiting, only to killed by the private who will get 40 points by suiciding two turns before they go
User avatar
Captain Crazyirishman
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 8:05 pm
Location: Dongbei China

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby TeeGee on Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:23 pm

For those of you who want a seq non speed game

try this one http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1000001
Image

catstevens: you are now an honorary American TG...Congrats
User avatar
Major TeeGee
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 7120
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: Somewhere on Planet Earth for now

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby HighlanderAttack on Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:46 pm

TeeGee wrote:For those of you who want a seq non speed game

try this one http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1000001


yea right

I think a small map doodle one minute seq would work out fine with standard esc
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, therefore, is not an act but a habit.
User avatar
Lieutenant HighlanderAttack
 
Posts: 10746
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:01 am

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby QoH on Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:47 pm

TeeGee wrote:For those of you who want a seq non speed game

try this one http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1000001

There's a reason why I hate flat rate.
Image
Please don't invite me to any pickup games. I will decline the invite.
Major QoH
 
Posts: 1817
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:37 pm

Re: Battle Royals a big dissapointment

Postby Sniper08 on Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:48 pm

TeeGee wrote:For those of you who want a seq non speed game

try this one http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=1000001


i tried to load the log and it crashed firefox :lol:
Image
User avatar
Colonel Sniper08
SoC Training Adviser
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:58 pm
Location: Dublin,Ireland


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users