Leitz wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Leitz wrote:Ow yeah, safari, when is SG7 going to be replaced?
PMing my reserves right now.
Ok, great!
Haha the replacement should go...
Day 2 - tl;dr haha
I almost feel bad!
Moderator: Community Team
Leitz wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Leitz wrote:Ow yeah, safari, when is SG7 going to be replaced?
PMing my reserves right now.
Ok, great!
betiko wrote:oh yeah definitely! he's going to hate us for that day 2, mostly after rodion's claim lol.
If we really are going to change SG7 I might give a break to the new guy.
UNVOTE
haven't heard much from medefe lately by the way. and is trini back?
strike wolf wrote:@shield: Half of what you posted has already been shown to be flawed. One part of your post is bogus reasoning and I've already warned you of this once but DON'T JUDGE THE BALANCE OF THIS GAME BASED ON THE BALANCE OF ANOTHER GAME HOSTED BY A DIFFERENT MOD. I really should FOS you just for that. I haven't been suggesting a no lynch. I've been suggesting that Rodion hammer himself. If Rodion refuses than one of the volunteers (preferably Chap) to hammer. That way no one else has to claim. So yes...you're post has little more than zero value.
strike wolf wrote:Rodion wrote:strike wolf wrote:Chap's already volunteered. The other option is you self-hammer and then there's zero chance of killing two townies in one move but I'm interested in seeing chap follow through with it.
It's decided. Strike will be hammering me after I finish my back-and-forth with Jonty.
*Yawn* you should think of what you're suggesting Rodion. You're basically either forcing the person that you want to hammer to claim in order to get town to reconsider or you're forcing someone to hammer without a suggestion. If Chap wants to hammer I'm fine with it. I'm very interested in seeing if he's actually willing to risk it or if he's bluffing. I'm not so inclined to hammer anyone and you can spin this whatever way you want but unless you know for a fact that there's a role here that can force my vote there's a 0% chance that I'll be hammering you. If I get vigged for this sentiment I don't care. I really feel you've misplayed your role if we're going to hammer you and you're telling the truth and I think the only legitimate options are to go the safe route and hammer yourself or for the person who's already volunteered hammer you. For one thing you said it yourself that we shouldn't have a bunch of vanillas or other roles that have limited impact or negative impact to the game limiting the people that mafia has to choose from.
strike wolf wrote:strike wolf wrote:3. Chapcrap-for a while chap actually jumped Jimfinn mostly for what's happened on the last couple pages. I agree with most of what he has said regarding rodion and I still get the impression his case on trini was an earnest attempt at scum hunting but his posts the last couple pages have shown evidence of skimming and a couple other odd behaviors. He explained his reasoning well enough that I am not going to get into detail but I will keep an eye on him.
From last Friday.
How many times do I have to say it Rodion? There's no chance I am going to hammer you. zero, nil, none, zilch.
Yes I'm willing to take the chance that the vig is either non-existant or that he will decide to give me a chance to defend myself tomorrow or that I might be busdriven with the mafia's target whatever over hammering you and the chance that you're a bomb.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:strike wolf wrote:strike wolf wrote:3. Chapcrap-for a while chap actually jumped Jimfinn mostly for what's happened on the last couple pages. I agree with most of what he has said regarding rodion and I still get the impression his case on trini was an earnest attempt at scum hunting but his posts the last couple pages have shown evidence of skimming and a couple other odd behaviors. He explained his reasoning well enough that I am not going to get into detail but I will keep an eye on him.
From last Friday.
How many times do I have to say it Rodion? There's no chance I am going to hammer you. zero, nil, none, zilch.
Yes I'm willing to take the chance that the vig is either non-existant or that he will decide to give me a chance to defend myself tomorrow or that I might be busdriven with the mafia's target whatever over hammering you and the chance that you're a bomb.
perhaps this will answer some questions. If not I'll explain in the morning.
betiko wrote:actually i tried to read between the lines as trini did and I kind of read a softclaim there, don't know if it's true or not, but it's possible.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:well trini seemed to get it not sure about anyone else. My refusal to hammer was more than just being stubborn or not wanting to. I softclaimed my character's name. I am Zero. As for why claim now. I had no illusion about not claiming today so I went ahead and name claimed. As far as my role, I believe my character is strong enough that I do not have to fully claim so I will let the mafia wifom it themselves.
betiko wrote:strike wolf wrote:well trini seemed to get it not sure about anyone else. My refusal to hammer was more than just being stubborn or not wanting to. I softclaimed my character's name. I am Zero. As for why claim now. I had no illusion about not claiming today so I went ahead and name claimed. As far as my role, I believe my character is strong enough that I do not have to fully claim so I will let the mafia wifom it themselves.
ok, i didn't get any of your softclaim then, i understood your post as if you were softclaiming vig!(the way you kind of meant there was zero chance you would hammer unless the vig blablabla made me think that you knew what the vig would do or not do because you WERE the vig).
guess the busdriver has a few more ideas for tonight (I doubt anyone will counterclaim zero, or it's a very strange play from strike).
safariguy5 wrote:Announcement
pancakemix has replaced shieldgenerator7.
Epitaph1 wrote:I've seen the movie and have a couple of ideas of what Zero's abilities might be. However, there is really no point in even suggesting the possibilities if we believe strike to be town.
chapcrap wrote:Well... I haven't seen the movie, but from what others say, Zero wouldn't be scummy. So, I guess with the flavor, I'll unvote.
Leitz wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Announcement
pancakemix has replaced shieldgenerator7.
Ok, hope to hear from him soon!Epitaph1 wrote:I've seen the movie and have a couple of ideas of what Zero's abilities might be. However, there is really no point in even suggesting the possibilities if we believe strike to be town.
Agreed. Time to look for a new case for the moment. Maybe wait to see what pancakemix has to say?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
chapcrap wrote:Well, my two other options for today, after strike, were MeDeFe and Leitz. MeDeFe has been suspiciously quiet today while Leitz is just doing more of the same scummy stuff. For instance, a post with nothing of value:Leitz wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Announcement
pancakemix has replaced shieldgenerator7.
Ok, hope to hear from him soon!Epitaph1 wrote:I've seen the movie and have a couple of ideas of what Zero's abilities might be. However, there is really no point in even suggesting the possibilities if we believe strike to be town.
Agreed. Time to look for a new case for the moment. Maybe wait to see what pancakemix has to say?
chapcrap wrote:Well, my two other options for today, after strike, were MeDeFe and Leitz. MeDeFe has been suspiciously quiet today while Leitz is just doing more of the same scummy stuff. For instance, a post with nothing of value:
*snip*
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
dazza2008 wrote:This is going to go on forever. Lets just get him to L-1 and someone hammer. I will because I am pretty convinced he is scum.
dazza2008 wrote:I already said mate. I am convinced he is scum. I don't care who hammers. Get him to L-1 and I will do it or Chap.
You want us to FOS those we want to hammer then when I do you worry about another claim. The only way not to get another claim is just to do it. So why f*ck around for weeks? Lets just get it done.
dazza2008 wrote:So because he is convincing he must be telling the truth?![]()
We all know he is a good player. If he fakeclaims it will be convincing and he will fight to survive as long as he can.
If he is scum the longer this goes on the more info his scum-mates will get.
dazza2008 wrote:Lets just do it then. Someone vote now and I will hammer.
dazza2008 wrote:Swifte wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Swifte wrote:strike wolf wrote:Swifte can you remind me why Dazza over chap? I'd look it up myself but I don't have time right now.
Well, I went through yesterday and re-read all of dazza's posts, which I would encourage others to do as well - while he's been active, for the most part his posts have been pretty short and just about every one is him hoping on whatever bandwagon we're on at the time, which is necessary to an extent on the first day but it's been a continued pattern with him, which just makes me wonder about his motivations. Then to volunteer to hammer an hour after chap really bugs me.
If I agree to a case I will jump on the bandwagon. So because I don't make massive posts I must be scum?
First of all, you volunteered to hammer, I was just putting forth my opinions on why you over chap. I'm not claiming to be certain either you or chap are scum, don't blow it out of proportion. I'm picking between the two of your because I agree with the thought that fewer new roles revealed today is a good thing.
Second, it's not the length in it of itself, but the fact that it shows that you've bandwagoned almost every case, including the 'Rodion-spoke-French' thing, which leads me to, as I said, just question your motivations. It comes across as following the group when it happens repeatedly, and sometimes it's a sign of scum willing to jump on any case, sometimes it's an innocent player, it's not proof in itself of anything, but whenever there's a pattern it's worth noting.
OK.
safariguy5 wrote:Vote Count
Rodion (6)- strike, chap, jonty, Mob, betiko, epitaph
strike(1)- Rodiondazza2008 wrote:Leitz wrote:We're letting this drag! Rodion is two votes away, so we either let dazza or chap hammer, correct? I trust neither of them really..
So what do you suggest?
dazza2008 wrote:If Chap is going to hammer we need him to unvote. Then 2 more people vote then he hammers. Or someone vote and I will hammer. Not much time lets make a decision.
dazza2008 wrote:trinicardinal wrote:dazza2008 wrote:If Chap is going to hammer we need him to unvote. Then 2 more people vote then he hammers. Or someone vote and I will hammer. Not much time lets make a decision.
I say chap unvote, I can vote and then dazza to bring him to L-1. Then chap can hammer
Lets do it then.
dazza2008 wrote:betiko wrote:are you guys waiting the last seconds like in speed games?? last thing we need is everyone to stay silent. fishy and unwanted things could happen, mostly because everyone wouldn't get their word. I m surprised we don't see strike or medefe since a few days, i've seen strike posting all around mafia threads. open your mouth people!!
What exactly do you want everyone to talk about? I think everyone is fed up with going over and over the same points. I say we should just do what we said so we can move on.
dazza2008 wrote:betiko wrote:jonty125 wrote:BCS would be chap to hammer, as that what we decided
WCS chap not hammering, dazza did volunteer as well so its not like a power role is at risk and we can give chap a good grilling tomorrow.
WWCS dazza unvotes and leitz gets to hammer, and so on.
I won't unvote. Why would I?
dazza2008 wrote:Guys I am off to bed now. I may be on before the deadline or I may not. I will not unvote. So either Chap will hammer or it will be me.
dazza2008 wrote:Leitz wrote:Interesting point chap, I'll wait for strikes response before throwing out any votes.
Btw, correct me if I'm wrong, but dazza still hasn't posted in D3?
Yep I have nt posted today. Still not sure what to add. I think it was bad play by Rodion. The mafia got mega lucky with the kill. I need to look through again and see what I think. We need to hear from the cop too.
dazza2008 wrote:jonty125 wrote:chapcrap wrote:SG7 might just need to be replaced. He's disappeared from the forum a bit.
He hasn't logged in his CC since Christmas Eve, maybe Christmas related absence
Christmas related or not I think he and Jim need replacing. If Jim is replaced does is replacement get the results he got previously?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users