safariguy5 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:edocsil wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:And Edocsil my conjecture is far from pointless.
If I picked 7 players at random I could say the exact same thing. So I guess I really don't see what can be drawn from that statement.
There is a difference between picking 7 people at random and picking from a pool of players who may have a vested interest in eagleblade dieing.
It certianly is a stronger base to work from then what we have so far and makes more sense then tryng to figure out if "glowing words" and solitary figures means anything.
Take it or leave it.
Ionno, the problem with eagle is that just about everyone who played with him has come away with a bad experience. So it could be that people just voted him regardless of what alignment the voters were.
It would also make it safer to vote for him, so like everything, its how one chooses to look at it.
I dont wish to beat a dead horse