Leehar wrote:I'm sure skill popped in only a coupla pages back?
I don't think so... ok I looked and missed his post on page 18, in which he was addressing the case on jgordon. And that Feb 9, and today's the 13th. So only 4 days. Nevermind
Moderator: Community Team
Leehar wrote:I'm sure skill popped in only a coupla pages back?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
safariguy5 wrote:Wait really, we're chasing inactive lynches now with 2 claims on the table+ 1 softclaim? I question the need to force another case with the information on the table now. I mean, really, unless someone has some night action information that could help us catch scum, I really think we're digging ourselves a deeper hole if we force more claims.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
safariguy5 wrote:Wait really, we're chasing inactive lynches now with 2 claims on the table+ 1 softclaim? I question the need to force another case with the information on the table now. I mean, really, unless someone has some night action information that could help us catch scum, I really think we're digging ourselves a deeper hole if we force more claims.
Leehar wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Wait really, we're chasing inactive lynches now with 2 claims on the table+ 1 softclaim? I question the need to force another case with the information on the table now. I mean, really, unless someone has some night action information that could help us catch scum, I really think we're digging ourselves a deeper hole if we force more claims.
What sg said, what should we do if not that? The game just seems deadened to me... Are we supposed to wait for another day scene or something if not try to lynch someone?
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Leehar wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Wait really, we're chasing inactive lynches now with 2 claims on the table+ 1 softclaim? I question the need to force another case with the information on the table now. I mean, really, unless someone has some night action information that could help us catch scum, I really think we're digging ourselves a deeper hole if we force more claims.
What sg said, what should we do if not that? The game just seems deadened to me... Are we supposed to wait for another day scene or something if not try to lynch someone?
We could NL our way to night but that seems a waste.
jgordon1111 wrote:not a tree stump a actual living sentient tree walking and talking similar to tree ents from Lord of the Rings, I would fathom.
And this is why I fought hard to keep from claiming,on weak evidence and bandwagon.
But if I wanted to save myself I would Fake claim Doc, because the real doc probably wouldnt step forward and make himself a target for mafia at this point with no mafia being dead yet.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
jgordon1111 wrote:Ok I get it lol dont fake claim doc if your town bad idea,.........Hmmmm Safari why are you so absolutley sure BG is town? I can see the point about fakeclaiming Doc. But you really seem sure BG is town why? Because he did claim Doc?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
jgordon1111 wrote:Ok thank you sg7, good point. But what I have been trying to get to here is just this the lynch jgordon is still on and being sought by some, 1st because of my unwillingness to claim, then because we dont want any random killings That might be done by me,once I cleared the board of me doing that,then well now we are running out of time so heck lets lynch jgordon one of the power roles today, and doc can die tonight by mafia's hands 2 power roles out of the way. Who is orchestrating this roller coaster? Go back and check If you have any input on that let me know sg7
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:Well, IDK about saf, but I would like to hang you for starters. That whole business about not having your role is not new to you, and it smells of lies.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:Alright, don't have my role PM yet, so I don't know if I'm playing on the town side or mafia side, but I'll throw my thoughts out either way right now.
First, I sense some major bandwagoning here. Some people are playing "follow the leader" and although I don't know their intentions or whether it's good or bad I'd like to point it out.
page 22: Leehar votes Com9 for inactive, jgordon and IB (funny how that nickname just came up recently, in M:tG we called him "Iron" to my recollection; it reminds me of I.B. [url]http://www.ibo.org/[url] ) follow soon afterward with vote. I come in, claim mafia godfather, and then leehar unvotes, followed by jgordon and later IB.
So, I suspect something going on here, but at least they're active. I don't know what's going on exactly but it seems a lot of others are inactive (mas o menos), but I'll admit I skipped over the non-voting posts (such as that of edoc and saf) when looking at this pattern.
Wait, was it jgordon we got the claim of auto-biometric tree or something that could kill at night? don't remember... I'll go back and check real quick... ok here it is:
"Cabro, unblockable vigilante, tree person." Ok, what's a tree person? I call BS on grounds that he likes to slide under the radar with following votes a lot (tho admittedly I'd do that to if I was under that much pressure).
But what do I know? I haven't even got my role yet. ()
-SG7 ()
Users browsing this forum: Loose Canon