Moderator: Community Team

























Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.



Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.
You might have a change of mind once you've actually visited a bedroom other than your own.

























natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.
You might have a change of mind once you've actually visited a bedroom other than your own.
Okay, so Symm responds with "try not being a virgin".....

















john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless

























Phatscotty wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless
Obamacare forcing contraception coverage, the policy of forcing others to pay for someone bad bedroom decisions, taxpayer money being used to hand out free condoms.....
The talking point of "what goes on in our bedroom's isn't anyone's business!" now has to be followed by "but the results of what goes on in our bedrooms is everyone else's responsibility/business!"


























BigBallinStalin wrote:I thought the issue was more about people getting angry because government regulation will require religious organizations to be hypocritical, or at least counter-productive.
IIRC, they'd be legally required to subsidize procedures which go against Christian values (e.g. abortion, contraceptives, or ... is that it?).









Phatscotty wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless
Obamacare forcing contraception coverage, the policy of forcing others to pay for someone bad bedroom decisions, taxpayer money being used to hand out free condoms.....
The talking point of "what goes on in our bedroom's isn't anyone's business!" now has to be followed by "but the results of what goes on in our bedrooms is everyone else's responsibility/business!"

























































Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.
















PLAYER57832 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.
Exactly why you cannot truly object to this medical service being part of insurance.
The people who do object are those wanting to dictate behavior and to claim that their payments for employment give them the right to make very personal decisions for people they employ.
About like years ago when the boss pretty much told you to go to church.. or else. In fact, I can remember those days, to some extent.




















Baron Von PWN wrote:Isin't this move just requiring employer provided Insurance to cover contraceptives? and not some kind of massive free contraceptive program?
How is using a contraceptive a bad bedroom decision? Aren't contraceptives a measure to prevent bad bedroom decisions?


















Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:....Then neither is the contraception methods, supplies, or the consequences of what goes on in other people's bedroom.
You might have a change of mind once you've actually visited a bedroom other than your own.
Okay, so Symm responds with "try not being a virgin".....



Bones2484 wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:Isin't this move just requiring employer provided Insurance to cover contraceptives? and not some kind of massive free contraceptive program?
How is using a contraceptive a bad bedroom decision? Aren't contraceptives a measure to prevent bad bedroom decisions?
You are correct... and thus some of the confusion as to the point of this thread.









Baron Von PWN wrote:Phatscotty wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless
Obamacare forcing contraception coverage, the policy of forcing others to pay for someone bad bedroom decisions, taxpayer money being used to hand out free condoms.....
The talking point of "what goes on in our bedroom's isn't anyone's business!" now has to be followed by "but the results of what goes on in our bedrooms is everyone else's responsibility/business!"
Isin't this move just requiring employer provided Insurance to cover contraceptives? and not some kind of masive free contraceptive program?
How is using a contraceptive a bad bedroom decision? Aren't contraceptives a measure to prevent bad bedroom decisions?










Woodruff wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:Phatscotty wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless
Obamacare forcing contraception coverage, the policy of forcing others to pay for someone bad bedroom decisions, taxpayer money being used to hand out free condoms.....
The talking point of "what goes on in our bedroom's isn't anyone's business!" now has to be followed by "but the results of what goes on in our bedrooms is everyone else's responsibility/business!"
Isin't this move just requiring employer provided Insurance to cover contraceptives? and not some kind of masive free contraceptive program?
How is using a contraceptive a bad bedroom decision? Aren't contraceptives a measure to prevent bad bedroom decisions?
Phatscotty wants more abortions, you see.









Baron Von PWN wrote:Woodruff wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:Phatscotty wrote:john9blue wrote:i'm not sure what the point of this thread is, but obviously the logic is flawless
Obamacare forcing contraception coverage, the policy of forcing others to pay for someone bad bedroom decisions, taxpayer money being used to hand out free condoms.....
The talking point of "what goes on in our bedroom's isn't anyone's business!" now has to be followed by "but the results of what goes on in our bedrooms is everyone else's responsibility/business!"
Isin't this move just requiring employer provided Insurance to cover contraceptives? and not some kind of masive free contraceptive program?
How is using a contraceptive a bad bedroom decision? Aren't contraceptives a measure to prevent bad bedroom decisions?
Phatscotty wants more abortions, you see.
It's not even purely about preventing pregnancies, by making contraceptives more widely available you greatly reduce STIs/ STDs.










Evil Semp wrote:Does Obamacare require people to use contraception or just that it be covered by insurance?

























Phatscotty wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Does Obamacare require people to use contraception or just that it be covered by insurance?
Right, but this is only one piece of the overall picture. As we know, each piece as down slowly, over time, in ways that people do not notice. This isn't just about the Catholic thing, I'm going bigger picture with this, and pointing out the hypocrisy.










Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Does Obamacare require people to use contraception or just that it be covered by insurance?
Right, but this is only one piece of the overall picture. As we know, each piece as down slowly, over time, in ways that people do not notice. This isn't just about the Catholic thing, I'm going bigger picture with this, and pointing out the hypocrisy.
Oh, you're going to talk about yourself for a while?




















Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Evil Semp wrote:Does Obamacare require people to use contraception or just that it be covered by insurance?
Right, but this is only one piece of the overall picture. As we know, each piece as down slowly, over time, in ways that people do not notice. This isn't just about the Catholic thing, I'm going bigger picture with this, and pointing out the hypocrisy.
Oh, you're going to talk about yourself for a while?
Woodruff, why do you want the government to dictate what products business must sell?
Night Strike wrote:Why do you want them to dictate what you buy?
Night Strike wrote:Why do you want them to dictate religious tenants to religious organizations?
Night Strike wrote:All of these are violations of the Constitution, so why do you label people like Phatscotty a hypocrite for wanting to be free?






























Users browsing this forum: No registered users