Moderator: Community Team
+1chapcrap wrote:If you want some, you can make your own.



I would say that this is largely because games end faster and thus more get filled by the same people faster afterwards. I doubt the number of different maps/settings combos has changed very much over the last 3 months. Also as MichelSableheart said it is interesting to see the manipulation of the graphs by not starting at zero, i to at first glance thought they doubled over a one month period.AndyDufresne wrote:There are actually a large number of more speed games than there use to be, because of the Speed Game Revamp update.
For instance, take a look at the data regarding TOTAL Number of Speed Games... from November (before the update), December (update came mid-way through the month), and January (first full month post update).
As others have pointed out, games may not be up and waiting as long as they use to be because of the varying time-limits, but there certainly are a lot more in total!
--Andy
While there may be some graph manipulation, I would argue against the fact that the same speed players played many more games. Most of the people who are playing speed a lot would play multiple games at once. With a shortened time frame for turns, they either kept the same system or played less games at once and the same amount overall. I doubt your theory is what occurred.ljex wrote:I would say that this is largely because games end faster and thus more get filled by the same people faster afterwards. I doubt the number of different maps/settings combos has changed very much over the last 3 months. Also as MichelSableheart said it is interesting to see the manipulation of the graphs by not starting at zero, i to at first glance thought they doubled over a one month period.


Blame Excel for the graph manipulation, it did it all automatically! It sets the range automatically, and I didn't bother changing it!IcePack wrote:It's common to edit graphs based on expected # range. If you expect anywhere from 40-60k why would you start it from zero?
At work here we largely do this w graphs based on anticipated number feedback.