Moderator: Community Team














at present, men enjoy more power. in particular, the white man enjoys most power (across the world).
any giving of power to women, other ethnicities etc. will cause the white man to lose power. the white man, obviously, does not want to lose power. so he tries to stop power going to women, blacks, others. it is not because he 'hates women', it is because he wants to preserve his dominance.
the carpet man wrote:excuse me? i quote myself.at present, men enjoy more power. in particular, the white man enjoys most power (across the world).
any giving of power to women, other ethnicities etc. will cause the white man to lose power. the white man, obviously, does not want to lose power. so he tries to stop power going to women, blacks, others. it is not because he 'hates women', it is because he wants to preserve his dominance.
you are just ignoring what i say because it does not agree with your view of the world. just as you have done before.










the carpet man wrote:the gender of the woman is not the reason the man does not wish her to have power. he does not wish her to have power because this would result in him losing power. his reasoning is himself, not the woman. how can you not see that?
it is very easy to look at differences in gender, ethnicity, age, wealth etc. and blame these for people's actions. but that does not make you right.










the carpet man wrote:it happens to women, yes i speak of women. but it also happens to all people who are not involved in the power monopoly. you single out women and pretend they suffer for their gender. i point out that everyone suffers who does not currently hold power.














natty wrote:We don't have sex because we're subconsciously yearning to spread our genes, we have sex because it feels good, and that applies to all genders.





TA1LGUNN3R wrote:wut. Clearly the first part is erroneous. The very existence of life has been dependent on organisms spreading their genes; it follows that without this libido species will die out.














tkr4lf wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:You think that all people who are not white are too ugly to have sex with.
Man, I can't imagine that. There are some hot ass women of every race/nationality. Just a few examples:
White:
Black:
Hispanic:
Indian:
Native American:
Japanese:
Chinese:
Indonesian:
Iranian:
I think any guy who wouldn't have sex with any of these women is either gay, incredibly racist, or a liar.
tkr4lf wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:DUDE WTF
WHY OH WHY
Did you post the lightest-skinned women of each race? You look just as bad as NS now. The Indian looks like a typical woman from Des Moines. This race - baiting has got to stop.
Sorry, I just googled "hot white woman", "hot black woman", "hot hispanic woman", "hot japanese woman", etc., etc. I just picked the one with the best body from the first page. So blame google, not me.

















natty dread wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:^^^Gay ^^^
Why, congratulations Juan, you've just reached the level of humour of a 3-year old.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Humour?

















natty dread wrote:TA1LGUNN3R wrote:wut. Clearly the first part is erroneous. The very existence of life has been dependent on organisms spreading their genes; it follows that without this libido species will die out.
It may be true to some lower mammals and other lifeforms, but higher primates clearly have sex for pleasure only (as well as for proecreation). Look at bonobo chimps. They have bisexual relationships that have nothing to do with procreation and insteand only serve to strengthen social bonds.
The evolutionary reason for the existence of our libido may well be procreation, originally. However we have evolved since caveman times, we are capable of differentiating between sex and procreation, and most people have sex because it feels good.
Human behaviour is a complex subject, especially sexual behaviour. And to simplify the whole subject into "we just subconsciously want to make babies" is reductionist and foolish.





Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap