Democrat Party's War on America Grows

[Phatscotty]

All of a sudden it's okay to kill bald eagles, the Democratic party is flying an American flag with Obama's face on it, they want high gas prices, they got our country's credit rating downgraded by adding 8+ trillion dollars to the debt in just under 4 years (and then blamed it on the dog), all of a sudden they think it's okay to discriminate on people just because they are white or a Christian and racism and religious bigotry is their obsession of the day, they try to shut down as much oil production as possible, they try to extend the food stamp rolls so they can count on votes through redistributing freebies, they accuse people who support the first and second amendment as "clinging to their bibles and their guns" when they are just practicing their rights as Americans, they want higher taxes and bigger government but won't cut their spending during a time of credit downgrades, they are content in creating 20,000 new regulations every year so far to the point where your child cannot even open up a lemonade stand in your front yard, they have even attacked the Boy Scouts of America, and they aim to change our history and our traditions every chance they get, they seek to divide us by gender and race and wealth through class warfare and say it's in the name of fairness?

[Night Strike]

That sounds like a pretty apt description of the current state of affairs.

[pimpdave]

This thread expresses a political opinion contrary to those I express on this website, therefore it must be trolling.

[Phatscotty]

This thread expresses a political opinion contrary to those I express on this website, therefore it must be trolling.

Great reaction on my first thread in in a long time that calls out the Democrat Party based on 100% facts (no name calling, no conclusion jumping, no juxtaposing, just observation of what they do and have done), and from the guy who has made 117 name-calling hate filled threads full of lies attacking Conservatives in the last 100 days. Thin skin much?

I have a solution for you though. You could try giving up denying reality and hold some political opinions that are not hate-based.

[natty dread]

I tried to read your op but it was such a mess of words without any paragraph breaks that I gave up after the first word.

[Neoteny]

Non_sequitur.wmv

[Phatscotty]

I tried to read your op but it was such a mess of words without any paragraph breaks that I gave up after the first word.

How typical! It's okay, we understand you have a hard time reading words but we know this isn't at all refusing to observe reality on your part, based on the excuse of paragraph structure! x a trillion

I always will take an attack on paragraph structure as a compliment, even though you are incorrect. Everything in the OP is all in the same paragraph, because everything in the OP is empirical evidence that the Democrat Party's war on America is growing.

If you want, I can walk you through each observation one by one, slowly, so you might understand.

[Bones2484]

As if a Democrat couldn't write up a similarly intended post against what Republicans are doing, right?

Can't we all just agree that bi-partisan politics is what is truly destroying America? Or is it just easier to blame the side you don't agree with?

[comic boy]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

[Phatscotty]

As if a Democrat couldn't write up a similarly intended post against what Republicans are doing, right?

Can't we all just agree that bi-partisan politics is what is truly destroying America? Or is it just easier to blame the side you don't agree with?

You are a little late to the game. In case you missed it, here is the 12th thread of a Democrat writing up a similarly intended post against what Republicans are doing. viewtopic.php?f=8&t=167045

Of course, you probably see no difference in my thread which deals with the truth and basic observation compared to the other threads which are based on lies and what 1 guy said about 1 girl and focuses on hate and division.

just curious, where in your opinion are Republicans attacking American traditions, principles, and values?

[Phatscotty]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

You would call clear cut examples of reality grossly exaggerated rhetoric, I wonder why that is. I will give it 50-50 that you did not actually read the empirical evidence like Natty

Which examples I provided are rhetoric? false? didn't happen?

Also, no president has ever been re-elected when their average approval rating was below 50%. Throw in the towel?
You are pissin in the wind with your statement Obama isn't even close to 50%. Continue ignoring reality at your own peril!

[Night Strike]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

Where's the exaggerated rhetoric? I can immediately think of a news story for every single one of those issues Phatscotty posted. I'm not going to go find links for all of them, but they're all founded on actual events and comments.

[Timminz]

Which examples I provided are rhetoric?

Found one.

our health care system is socialist

[Phatscotty]

Which examples I provided are rhetoric?

Found one.

our health care system is socialist

how is that rhetoric? Is the state not taking charge of distributing healthcare?

[comic boy]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

You would call clear cut examples of reality grossly exaggerated rhetoric, I wonder why that is. I will give it 50-50 that you did not actually read the empirical evidence like Natty

Which examples I provided are rhetoric? false? didn't happen?

Also, no president has ever been re-elected when their average approval rating was below 50%. Throw in the towel?
You are pissin in the wind with your statement Obama isn't even close to 50%. Continue ignoring reality at your own peril!

Yet you keep running away from the bet I offered.....I wonder why !

[Phatscotty]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

You would call clear cut examples of reality grossly exaggerated rhetoric, I wonder why that is. I will give it 50-50 that you did not actually read the empirical evidence like Natty

Which examples I provided are rhetoric? false? didn't happen?

Also, no president has ever been re-elected when their average approval rating was below 50%. Throw in the towel?
You are pissin in the wind with your statement Obama isn't even close to 50%. Continue ignoring reality at your own peril!

Yet you keep running away from the bet I offered.....I wonder why !

OH MY DODGE!

Wrong again. As if that has anything to do with the issue we are talking about. Go back and look when you offered the bet... you ignored my response, just like you ignore and dodge reality.

History goes 100% against your position and your bet. Oh yeah, that's why I won't take a bet where history 100% supports my opinion! You nailed it!

[comic boy]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

Where's the exaggerated rhetoric? I can immediately think of a news story for every single one of those issues Phatscotty posted. I'm not going to go find links for all of them, but they're all founded on actual events and comments.

Exaggerated - Unduly or unrealistically magnified.
I trust this will aid your comprehension.

[comic boy]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

You would call clear cut examples of reality grossly exaggerated rhetoric, I wonder why that is. I will give it 50-50 that you did not actually read the empirical evidence like Natty

Which examples I provided are rhetoric? false? didn't happen?

Also, no president has ever been re-elected when their average approval rating was below 50%. Throw in the towel?
You are pissin in the wind with your statement Obama isn't even close to 50%. Continue ignoring reality at your own peril!

Yet you keep running away from the bet I offered.....I wonder why !

OH MY DODGE!

Wrong again. As if that has anything to do with the issue we are talking about. Go back and look when you offered the bet... you ignored my response, just like you ignore and dodge reality.

History goes 100% against your position and your bet. Oh yeah, that's why I won't take a bet where history 100% supports my opinion! You nailed it!

So you are convinced that Obama will not win the election, yet will not back up that opinion with a bet , that certainly shows a great deal of conviction.

[Phatscotty]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

Where's the exaggerated rhetoric? I can immediately think of a news story for every single one of those issues Phatscotty posted. I'm not going to go find links for all of them, but they're all founded on actual events and comments.

Exaggerated - Unduly or unrealistically magnified.
I trust this will aid your comprehension.

He asked you where the exaggeration was, and you reply with a definition of the word exaggerated?

We crown thee Dodge King!

[comic boy]

It would appear I now need to define the term 'comprehension ' .

[Timminz]

Which examples I provided are rhetoric?

Found one.

our health care system is socialist

how is that rhetoric? Is the state not taking charge of distributing healthcare?

When did that happen? Last I heard, there was some nice crony capitalism going on (with the mandatory insurance, and whatnot), but health care was still being administered by the same organizations as before 2008.

[Phatscotty]

In an attempt to steer this thread away from the realms of fantasy I shall make a factual observation : It would appear that certain conservatives on this forum have thrown in the towel and already conceded a November victory for Obama , hence the grossly exagerated rhetoric.

You would call clear cut examples of reality grossly exaggerated rhetoric, I wonder why that is. I will give it 50-50 that you did not actually read the empirical evidence like Natty

Which examples I provided are rhetoric? false? didn't happen?

Also, no president has ever been re-elected when their average approval rating was below 50%. Throw in the towel?
You are pissin in the wind with your statement Obama isn't even close to 50%. Continue ignoring reality at your own peril!

Yet you keep running away from the bet I offered.....I wonder why !

OH MY DODGE!

Wrong again. As if that has anything to do with the issue we are talking about. Go back and look when you offered the bet... you ignored my response, just like you ignore and dodge reality.

History goes 100% against your position and your bet. Oh yeah, that's why I won't take a bet where history 100% supports my opinion! You nailed it!

So you are convinced that Obama will not win the election, yet will not back up that opinion with a bet , that certainly shows a great deal of conviction.

I'm not really in the habit of betting on someone when I don't even know who that person will be. It's principle. It's okay if you don't understand.

Why does a Brit care so much about Obama anyways? Why do you lick his boots? Could it be because Obama is doing such a good job waging war against America? It's clear you don't like America, which explains why you love Obama so much.

I rest my case

[Phatscotty]

Which examples I provided are rhetoric?

Found one.

our health care system is socialist

how is that rhetoric? Is the state not taking charge of distributing healthcare?

When did that happen? Last I heard, there was some nice crony capitalism going on (with the mandatory insurance, and whatnot), but health care was still being administered by the same organizations as before 2008.

oh, so technically, since the state socializing healthcare does not happen until 2013, saying in 2012 that healthcare is being socialized by the state is rhetoric...got it!

[comic boy]

Scotty
You have gone from exaggerated rhetoric to plain fiction , the fact is you would struggle to find many posts of mine applauding Obama , truth is the last refuge of the scoundrel you know! As for the bet I can wait until the nomination is finalised , then you can run away again , to be fair I would do the same if I had the same lack of conviction.

[Phatscotty]

Yet you keep running away from the bet I offered.....I wonder why !

OH MY DODGE!

Wrong again. As if that has anything to do with the issue we are talking about. Go back and look when you offered the bet... you ignored my response, just like you ignore and dodge reality.

History goes 100% against your position and your bet. Oh yeah, that's why I won't take a bet where history 100% supports my opinion! You nailed it![/quote]

So you are convinced that Obama will not win the election, yet will not back up that opinion with a bet , that certainly shows a great deal of conviction.[/quote]

I'm not really in the habit of betting on someone when I don't even know who that person will be. It's principle. It's okay if you don't understand.

Why does a Brit care so much about Obama anyways? Why do you lick his boots? Could it be because Obama is doing such a good job waging war against America? It's clear you don't like America, which explains why you love Obama so much.

I rest my case[/quote]

You have gone from exaggerated rhetoric to plain fiction , the fact is you would struggle to find many posts of mine applauding Obama , truth is the last refuge of the scoundrel you know![/quote]

then why are you so anxious to bet on him? None of your response answers the question why you care about Obama so much (in this thread anyways), but then again none of your responses actually deal with the post you respond to. dodging the part about the bet as well...