FOX is underrated

[InkL0sed]

Click image to enlarge.

[chang50]

Click image to enlarge.

Amusing but sad,I watch Faux news most days and can confirm it is often very poor with a handful of honourable exceptions,BBC World is a far more reliable channel for accurate news.

[saxitoxin]

Sorry -

Gang, feel free to run anything else you guys hear on the internet through me for verification (e.g. people are getting their kidneys stolen, Nigerian prince needs help moving money, etc.).

BTW - my SIG is not photoshopped and is 100% legit.

[Phatscotty]

I knew the photo was a fake!

Yeah....a Buddhist named Mohammed.....mm hmmm

[Baron Von PWN]

I like that the problem with the map was that it's from google, not that Fox would no make such a mistake.

an equaly effective counter would be to request video of the supposed screen shot.

[InkL0sed]

saxi, you've fallen for yet another trap.

The point is not to rely on unsourced images for these thnigs. You know what you can rely on? Snopes.com.

http://www.snopes.com/media/goofs/toolooz.asp

[pimpdave]

So does this mean InkL0sed has trapped saxitoxin twice while never being trapped by saxitoxin?

Most impressive.

[saxitoxin]

saxi, you've fallen for yet another trap.

The point is not to rely on unsourced images for these thnigs. You know what you can rely on? Snopes.com.

http://www.snopes.com/media/goofs/toolooz.asp

LOL, good attempt at a save, however, you posted this before it went up on Snopes so this is a reverse double blind trap and you're in my net about to get tickled.

Saxi, meanwhile, correctly identified it as a Photoshopped image without Snopes and even picked-up on something Snopes did not (i.e. out-of-sync ticker). Saxi doesn't need to reply on Snopes DOT com when Saxi has a bloodhound's eyes, an eagle's eyes and a horses' [MOD EDIT].

[InkL0sed]

Except none of the things your image points out are actually proof of anything. Reasons to be suspicious, yes, but not proof.

And I actually posted it on the same day as snopes, but that's irrelevant anyway, because it's true I posted this before verifying it. I decided it'd be good troll bait, and then realized it was pretty suspicious. So I checked up on it afterward and decided to keep it as a trap.

So you've actually been re-reverse triple blind trapped and in any case you can't trap me when I still have you trapped from the first time.

(Dave, he's never trapped me, only I him.) Therefore, I win this thread.

[saxitoxin]

Except none of the things your image points out are actually proof of anything. Reasons to be suspicious, yes, but not proof.

Whatever - the screen animation using a Google Maps image when FOX has never before used a Google Maps image and an 8 month old Ticker running across the bottom of the screen provide a preponderance of evidence the image has been manipulated.

AND you can't trap someone without talking animals. This is a common FACT. How do you think you would hold onto someone if they tried to do a windmill or a pinwheel on you? You need animals and you had NONE. This is a BASIC RULE of trapping.

Saxi wins - assume the position.

[Falkomagno]

Saxitoxin: devil's advocate

[InkL0sed]

Except none of the things your image points out are actually proof of anything. Reasons to be suspicious, yes, but not proof.

Whatever - the screen animation using a Google Maps image when FOX has never before used a Google Maps image and an 8 month old Ticker running across the bottom of the screen provide a preponderance of evidence the image has been manipulated.

AND you can't trap someone without talking animals. This is a common FACT. How do you think you would hold onto someone if they tried to do a windmill or a pinwheel on you? You need animals and you had NONE. This is a BASIC RULE of trapping.

Saxi wins - assume the position.

Ah, but I never meant that I Trapped you, merely that I trapped you in a looser sense.

Oh the subtleties of language.

[saxitoxin]

Except none of the things your image points out are actually proof of anything. Reasons to be suspicious, yes, but not proof.

Whatever - the screen animation using a Google Maps image when FOX has never before used a Google Maps image and an 8 month old Ticker running across the bottom of the screen provide a preponderance of evidence the image has been manipulated.

AND you can't trap someone without talking animals. This is a common FACT. How do you think you would hold onto someone if they tried to do a windmill or a pinwheel on you? You need animals and you had NONE. This is a BASIC RULE of trapping.

Saxi wins - assume the position.

Ah, but I never meant that I Trapped you, merely that I trapped you in a looser sense.

Oh the subtleties of language.

Who are you calling loose?

[InkL0sed]

Saxi, you're a sex addict. Who are you implying isn't loose?