
Moderator: Community Team

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







I am pro-choice, but it is disingenuous to act as though abortion is purely a matter of personal freedom. Those who are pro-life believe that a fetus represents a human life rather than a non-sentient bunch of cells as those of us who are pro-choice would argue. Therefore, in their eyes, an abortion constitutes killing a person. It isn't only wrong to be one who receives an abortion, but the fetus's being killed is itself a tragedy that should be avoided.
The argument in this image makes as much sense as:
Citizen: I don't believe in murder.
Government: Then don't murder.
It is helpful when trying to debate a point (and in almost every other interaction) to put yourself in the other person's shoes. It can help you see that while an argument may strengthen your resolve because it appeals to your line of reasoning, the other side is often approaching the issue from a very different angle.
Edit: Incidentally, I realize the irony in describing myself as "pro-choice". The terms pro-choice and pro-life are evidence of the point I'm making, which is that the two sides frame the issue completely differently. "Pro-choice" oversimplifies the issue into a women's rights issue (like the link does), and "pro-life" oversimplifies it into only being about a fetus's life. Obviously, nobody is really anti-choice or anti-life, but each side believes the other to be so when that isn't what the debate is about at all.
Edit2: I feel like a lot of you don't understand what I was trying to say. In my above post, I never argued either position. I merely presented the pro-life argument. I am not pro-life. That does not mean that I need to stick my head in the sand and pretend I don't know how those folks feel about this issue. They aren't exactly shy about the fact that they believe that abortion is murder. Just because I said what their argument is doesn't mean that I agree with it or even think it's a valid argument. It doesn't mean that I support all Christian ideology or all right wing ideology. If you want my personal opinion on abortion, I'll give it to you, but those of you sending me insults should really learn to distinguish between somebody stating facts about a debate and taking a side. This isn't about making concessions to the other side; I just want you to realize why the other side came to the conclusion that they did so you can think critically about how you can appeal to them when trying to convince them that your opinion is right.
Both sides seem to think this is a tug of war of either pro- versus anti-life or pro- versus anti-choice. That doesn't get you anywhere because it turns out you're standing perpendicular to each other and there's nobody at the other end of your rope.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"

























jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







pimpdave wrote:



































Juan_Bottom wrote:I would have thought you'd agree with the pic, phatscotty.











































Juan_Bottom wrote:I would have thought you'd agree with the pic, phatscotty.




















Phatscotty wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:I would have thought you'd agree with the pic, phatscotty.
I saw the inaccuracy before I even finished reading it. Not like accuracy matters to someone pumping steroids into their platform of hatred, intolerance, and bigotry though.










notyou2 wrote:He doesn't believe what comes out of his mouth let alone what he writes anonymously on the net.












































Victor Sullivan wrote:
HALT!
This thread is being reviewed by the Thread Police (TP) for a grossly biased thread title. The paperwork is currently being filled out, and in 5-7 business days, you may be issued a ticket. Please note that your fourth infraction will result in punishment by community service hours (in addition to the cost of the ticket/s). If you would like to challenge the indictment, you may appeal to the Forum Board (FB) for a re-review of the situation.
Junior Officer Victor Sullivan
Thread Police
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.






pimpdave wrote:

























jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







pimpdave wrote:The Tea Party: We hate black people and want to kill everyone who disagrees with us.
Government: You have been added to the terrorist watch list.














































Phatscotty wrote:pimpdave wrote:
Citizen: I don't believe in abortion.
Gov't: Then don't get one.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?![]()
Citizen: I don't believe in birth control.
Gov't: Then don't use it.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?![]()
Citizen: I don't believe in gay marriage
Gov't: Then don't marry a gay.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?
Citizen Pimpdave: I don't like the Tea Party.
Gov't: Then don't vote for them.
Hey, it works!


















tkr4lf wrote:Phatscotty wrote:pimpdave wrote:
Citizen: I don't believe in abortion.
Gov't: Then don't get one.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?![]()
Citizen: I don't believe in birth control.
Gov't: Then don't use it.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?![]()
Citizen: I don't believe in gay marriage
Gov't: Then don't marry a gay.
Citizen: But you are forcing me to financially support and enable others to do something that I don't believe in and strongly opposes my religious beliefs
Gov't: YUP! What's the problem?
Citizen Pimpdave: I don't like the Tea Party.
Gov't: Then don't vote for them.
Hey, it works!
The government forces you to pay for gay couples to get married?

























Phatscotty wrote:In 2013, the Tea Party will BE the government.






































































Phatscotty wrote:tkr, as has been proven many times over, gay marriage is all about getting access to benefits.



Phatscotty wrote:In 2013, the Tea Party will BE the government.











Users browsing this forum: No registered users