Moderator: Community Team
deantursx wrote:Freestyle should just be abolished...
betiko wrote:well, i play some of those games once in a while, and beleive it or not, i do think it's fun to coordinate everything and having the tension to know if the other team is going to start its turn or not and everything.
I have been doing some team freestyles about a year ago and got farmed as well because my team had a full roster already in and a team 2 arrived and coordinated stuff.
so if there is something wrong here, it's team freestyles, not the fact of playing team freestyle the best way possible.
I also think freestyle in general is gross abuse; as i have a slow computer and i m far from the CC servers; i can play vs some american guys and he can have killed 6 territories i still don't see the 1st one he killed yet.
freestyle is just a complete different game from sequential; just make 2 scoreboards and everyone will be happy. In the meanwhile, don't blame people for playing games with settings they like (i personally do it for medal hunting trips+freestyle+nuclear+manual+random all at once, you can't beat those settings for effective medal hunting)
GLG plays ONLY low ranks and 99% on his farming settings and he got warned for playing only this way; not for playing a few of those.
Also I wanted to ad that it's really not about the team 2 that joins; it's really about getting the start advantage... there are so many tricks used by freestyle players anyway.
L M S wrote:codeblue1018 wrote:L M S wrote:aad0906 wrote:L M S wrote:What you are describing is not invite abuse and is not against the rules.
I agree. But what if they do this, and then the situation occurs that ljex describes: instead of unwitting lambs for the slaughter a couple of knowledgeable players join and also invite a team mate that doesn't join immediately (basically doing the same as "the accused") to neutralize the advantage of "the accused" and suddenly "the accused" all drop the game? That IMO is gross abuse of unwritten rules, even worse than the ranching that GLG was warned for. I would love to hear the opinion of a C&A mod on this. Maybe someone should file a "test case".
Just as you have the right to join a game whenever you want...you may also drop out of any game whenever you want and for whatever reason you want.
Again, not abuse.
Is foe'ing a player because you don't want to play them again abuse?...how about foe'ing a player because you are chasing the random medal and need unique defeats and don't want to 'waste time' playing the same players again to get it?
The answer is no, again. You have the right to foe anyone, for any reason you want.
LMS, think outside the friendship box mate. You are correct; it's not cheating. It's ranching unsuspecting players no matter how you paint it. Prime example is what ljax described. They are also joining team 2 games, minus the third player of course until such time team 1 gets a team together; freemiums, inexperienced players. Bottom line, its cheap play mate in which most experienced players could climb the scoreboard with ease as they are currently doing. Takes no skill whatsoever. Its amazes me what others will do to rise up the ranks; very respectable
I am.
These guys may be friends but I can tell you that they aren't the only ones doing it and some of the other players employing this smart way to play are definitely NOT my friends. I'll even go so far as admitting I have waited until all the other players joined before joining a freestyle game too. (GASP) I don't think its a "cheap" way to play and God knows the scoreboard is bogus anyway as a determination of the best player on CC, it's merely a representation of the player best at collecting points....the two are not the same, not even close.
I know how to collect points and have done it...thing is I don't give a damn about them or my rank. Do you really think that MY current rank is an accurate representation of my skill on CC? I have gone from 3744 to 1120 in 3 weeks and back to 3200 in a month, again and again simply by choosing the "right" style of game, and so could anyone else and they don't have to be so called "farming or ranching" games to do it. My 6 years of CC experience and nearly 10,000 games played, clan experience, team experience, map experience, specialty map diversity....I could go on and on....is an accurate representation of my CC skill.
Next thing you know we will have a cute little term describing the unfair advantage one team has over another because they all are communicating in real time over SKYPE and that is unfair to inexperienced players who don't...
edit:
AND, my respect for Tec805 (et al) comes from their incredible skill at playing, specifically, the Stalingrad map. We have been in some epic games on that map both with and against each other. Those guys know what they are doing on any map and I suspect are just having a good time playing the game the way they want to from time to time and there isn't a damn thing wrong with that.
tsioumiou wrote:This is about team games doubles, triples or quads freestyle casual.
What happens:
If the game is triples then only 2 players join team 1 while they wait until for team 2 to join (usually low rank players).
When team 2 joins, team 1 when they are ready (and also believe team 1 are offline), invite the 3rd member of their team and start all together.
TEAM 2 HAS NO CHANCE.
This is happening on small maps like doodle where the elimination of at least one player from the opposite team is certain if all 3 players start together on triple games.
This type of farming is worst than most the silly farming accusations/threads that i have seen in this forum.
PS This is happening mostly from generals and higher.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not sure if there is a thread already about it (if yes someone send me the link plz).
tec805 wrote:Basically it comes down to who do you want to have the advantage of going first, your team or theirs? Personally I prefer the advantage. If you would like to play against us we would be happy to play you, but don't expect us to give you the first turn(sorry I turned down your offer to be on your team ljex, but you've been a little too confrontational in the past forum dealings to want to play on your side!)
āÆ
smegal69 wrote:codeblue1018 ...... why not make this about the players in the game and not the clan they are in.
if you going to throw shit make sure yours don't stink![]()
Game 9066757 3 cooks,1 cadet
Game 9870687 3 privates,1 cook
Game 9976265 2 cooks,1 cadet and a scary Sargent
Game 9976268 3 cooks and a private
Game 9167338 1 cook,1 cadet and 2 privates
but don't worry i won't say a thing
smegal69 wrote:codeblue1018 ...... why not make this about the players in the game and not the clan they are in.
if you going to throw shit make sure yours don't stink![]()
Game 9066757 3 cooks,1 cadet
Game 9870687 3 privates,1 cook
Game 9976265 2 cooks,1 cadet and a scary Sargent
Game 9976268 3 cooks and a private
Game 9167338 1 cook,1 cadet and 2 privates
but don't worry i won't say a thing
simmons4 wrote:tsioumiou wrote:This is about team games doubles, triples or quads freestyle casual.
What happens:
If the game is triples then only 2 players join team 1 while they wait until for team 2 to join (usually low rank players).
When team 2 joins, team 1 when they are ready (and also believe team 1 are offline), invite the 3rd member of their team and start all together.
TEAM 2 HAS NO CHANCE.
This is happening on small maps like doodle where the elimination of at least one player from the opposite team is certain if all 3 players start together on triple games.
This type of farming is worst than most the silly farming accusations/threads that i have seen in this forum.
PS This is happening mostly from generals and higher.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not sure if there is a thread already about it (if yes someone send me the link plz).
some of tsioumiou games
Game 4545638
Game 4585982
Game 4058742
Game 4062187
Game 4160975
Game 4216692
Game 4353918
Game 4373434
Game 4422316
tsioumiou wrote:simmons4 wrote:tsioumiou wrote:This is about team games doubles, triples or quads freestyle casual.
What happens:
If the game is triples then only 2 players join team 1 while they wait until for team 2 to join (usually low rank players).
When team 2 joins, team 1 when they are ready (and also believe team 1 are offline), invite the 3rd member of their team and start all together.
TEAM 2 HAS NO CHANCE.
This is happening on small maps like doodle where the elimination of at least one player from the opposite team is certain if all 3 players start together on triple games.
This type of farming is worst than most the silly farming accusations/threads that i have seen in this forum.
PS This is happening mostly from generals and higher.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not sure if there is a thread already about it (if yes someone send me the link plz).
some of tsioumiou games
Game 4545638
Game 4585982
Game 4058742
Game 4062187
Game 4160975
Game 4216692
Game 4353918
Game 4373434
Game 4422316
Those games are 2008-09. You really looked up my games lol trying to find 5-10 games out of 7000 to make a point for yourself. How desperate are you?
There was no invite button back then if i remember correctly. Am i right? So if you created a game you couldnt take advantage the way you can now. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
I am joining all kinds of games in this site unlike you.
Which is fine, however
now you made me look at your games history.
I haven't ever accuse anyone personally, in fact i don't even now who you are, YOU MADE ME
You sir should be banned for life from this site for all the points you have stolen!
And now you and your buddies will say "Oh its not against the rules"
Well I am telling you : Those points have been robbed. The poor guys on team 2 never had a chance. on MANY MANY of you games![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I have an idea![]()
![]()
![]()
lets all start using your strategy !
In 1 year cc will have 1000 generals and all the rest will be poor cooks that cant win a single point.
Then all the "skilled" generals can play together for balance.
What do you think?
BGtheBrain wrote:The point is the unsuspecting noobs who join these games. They have no clue why the 3rd person on team 1 is not accepting the invite.
Reminds me of another case where someone was doing something legal, but everyone knew it just wasn't right.
It just makes me laugh when people think they're so good, but then you come to find out they just know a little trick to give them an advantage.
betiko wrote:I got a solution: when both teams joined a freestyle, the game should not be able to start before 12 or 24h. like this there is no advantage into joining last and everyone is aware of the start time of the game. if you don't show up, well that's just too bad.
after don't blame a team to be more organized than the other, because isn't that the point of a team??
BGtheBrain wrote:The point is the unsuspecting noobs who join these games. They have no clue why the 3rd person on team 1 is not accepting the invite.(See Below)
Reminds me of another case where someone was doing something legal, but everyone knew it just wasn't right.(Specify the case. I have heard of one that had this type of response, and in the end, we had to settle for a desperate and irresponsible solution.)
It just makes me laugh when people think they're so good, but then you come to find out they just know a little trick to give them an advantage.(Just who are you referring to here? Who are you aiming this bait/flame at?)
eddie2 wrote:I think you have forgot to add that players on team 1 also play shots for there team mates if they are not online at the moment needed to play the shots. this is babysitting abuse because it is ussually done with 20 hours left on the clock to prevent them losing a bonus. the whole freestyle needs to be looked at and rules preventing all the abuse stopped.
BGtheBrain wrote:jghost7 wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:The point is the unsuspecting noobs who join these games. They have no clue why the 3rd person on team 1 is not accepting the invite.(See Below)
Reminds me of another case where someone was doing something legal, but everyone knew it just wasn't right.(Specify the case. I have heard of one that had this type of response, and in the end, we had to settle for a desperate and irresponsible solution.)GLG, obviouslyLOL, Like I said.
It just makes me laugh when people think they're so good, but then you come to find out they just know a little trick to give them an advantage.(Just who are you referring to here? Who are you aiming this bait/flame at?)This is a general statement aimed at the recurring instances in CC and/or life where someone/anyone acts like they are very good at something, but in reality have just found a way to make things easier for them. Bait? No. Flame? No. Its an observation. If the people in question would take offense to this statement, they need thicker skin, or less questionable tactics. Who said anything about being very good at something? It sure sounded as if you assumed whomever you were referring to stated that they were so good and also that they are not and maybe in other ways too.... You probably should proofread your posts if you didn't think this could be taken as a flame or bait.
The point is that there will always be a unsuspecting noob somewhere doing something for the first or thirtyfirst time. Such is life. At some point they will figure things out. Either way, it is not helping to vent everyone's frustrations out here. As it stands, freestyle games are setup as such. The only real way to fix it is to change how freestyle runs. It is not rocket science. That is why I put out there to take it over to the suggestions forum. That way they can take a look in earnest to see if there is a way to improve the game type to maybe exclude this type of play.The issue is not with the unsuspecting noobs, it is with the exploitation of the unsuspecting noobs. Honestly, you are coming off as clueless or are purposely ignoring the real issue. The issue is with freestyle and not with the 'exploitation of unsuspecting noobs'. You are just trying to use them to further exploit the crack left open by the GLG ruling. Don't be a dick. This tactic is being used not just against low ranking players(noob seems offensive yes?) , it is being used against all comers. And the very obvious reason is to go first. Allowing someone else to go first in a freestyle game on purpose would seem noobish to me. Let me also add that I don't think you should be telling anyone here who they can or can't play on this site. If I wanted to play low ranking players all the time, then you would just have to suck it up cupcake! I paid to play and there is no rank restriction for games. So, don't try to bring that up as a reason. Everyone has the right to decline to play if they so desire. Besides, the number of players that play freestyle games are not as high and the selection of players available for such games are a bit slimmer than for the other types of games.
Thanks,
J
Anyways, people can say what they want to justify these tactics. Fact is this. It may take time and it wont be easy, but just like real life, when someone finds a way to gain an unfair advantage, eventually (sometimes slowly) the law catches up. LOL @ "the law"... I am not trying to justify anything. It seemed that you may have needed some education on the subject and so I took it upon myself to try. Your reference to the law is hilarious. This is a gaming site and not 'the law'. I assume that you were referring to the rules of the site(I hope) and see that you still don't get it. Why do you think the flaw lies with the rules and not the game type? Do you truly think that crusading on behalf of more 'laws' will fix it? The more rules you add the crappier things get. Whats next? Oh I am not allowed to play you until you improve your rank? I might get banned. Oh Bother! That is just plain stupid. Why not instead focus on what might actually improve the site/game and try fixing that?
GLGHandled improperly.
Caymanmew or whatever the name is. Intentionally missing the deplpoy phase of City Mogul Manual so he/she can go first.Another game type issue!
People setting up games with 5 player to attract NR.Hogwash! This is a pretty shitty thing too. If I wanted to set up a 5 player, and it is an option that I could select, then I would do so. Otherwise, you should take away 5 player games as an option.
ALL of these things were at one time within the rules. The rules can change to prevent taking advantage of players.Like I said before, fix the game. Quit thinking like a dick and thinking you can make up a rule for everything you don't like about the site. In your world the rules page would be the largest on the site.
aad0906 wrote:eddie2 wrote:I think you have forgot to add that players on team 1 also play shots for there team mates if they are not online at the moment needed to play the shots. this is babysitting abuse because it is ussually done with 20 hours left on the clock to prevent them losing a bonus. the whole freestyle needs to be looked at and rules preventing all the abuse stopped.
That would actually be against existing rules, if you suspect this to happen you should file a C&A and the mods can look into this.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Tyler98