I like how Tea Baggers all whine about Tea Party Threads

[pimpdave]

Then make five thousand about George Zimmerman.

And you all tried to get me banned for it too. So much crying...

[DoomYoshi]

Then make five thousand about George Zimmerman.

And you all tried to get me banned for it too. So much crying...

-1

[kentington]

Then make five thousand about George Zimmerman.

And you all tried to get me banned for it too. So much crying...

+1 -2 No one likes sarcasm.

If you like it why don't you marry it?

[TA1LGUNN3R]

It's selective memory failure.

-TG

[Mr_Adams]

You notice how if you google "Tea Party Death Squad", you now get 3 urban dictionary listings (most likely submitted by PD), 1 facebook page, started by a guy named "Dave" and the a million CC forum topics?

[Phatscotty]

Yeah I just ignore these. I don't have time to respond to 121 tea party threads in the last 110 days. I would just as soon kiss a wookie.

[nietzsche]

OMG not this again.

Really?

pimpdave you start a post only thinking on bothering Phatscotty?

I really don't know what do you have against the mods, you must have some dirt that they don't do nothing to you..

And to the other members of the Off-Topics that think you are funny. It must be some alien-high IQ funny because I dont get it.

Seriously, and collecting my PMs to get me banned? Those things were harmless, I was being playful, but just like you did with Woodruff, you got me banned. I've seen Woodruff's posts, and even though he admitedly he sometimes loses the cool, he was never as annoying as you are. 1000 times would like to have Woodruff here instead of you. See, unlike you, me and Woodruff are authentic, I bet you go re-checking your posts making sure you are the most annoying possible to your targets while playing by all the rules.

THe f*ck, seriously mods, step up, stop being machines deciding whether or not rules are broken and use some wisdom like a judge can do and give pimpdave his deserved forum rest.

[kentington]

OMG not this again.

Really?

pimpdave you start a post only thinking on bothering Phatscotty?

I really don't know what do you have against the mods, you must have some dirt that they don't do nothing to you..

And to the other members of the Off-Topics that think you are funny. It must be some alien-high IQ funny because I dont get it.

Seriously, and collecting my PMs to get me banned? Those things were harmless, I was being playful, but just like you did with Woodruff, you got me banned. I've seen Woodruff's posts, and even though he admitedly he sometimes loses the cool, he was never as annoying as you are. 1000 times would like to have Woodruff here instead of you. See, unlike you, me and Woodruff are authentic, I bet you go re-checking your posts making sure you are the most annoying possible to your targets while playing by all the rules.

THe f*ck, seriously mods, step up, stop being machines deciding whether or not rules are broken and use some wisdom like a judge can do and give pimpdave his deserved forum rest.

I did think I was being funny until your post. I didn't know he got Woodruff banned. I'll be boycotting his threads from now on. So, pimpdave was carpetman? And pimpdave wasn't banned?

[thegreekdog]

Alright, let's talk about this then.

pimpdave isn't doing anything that anyone else isn't also doing. A whole lot of us create threads. A lot of us create threads regarding politics. pimpdave's threads generate conversation; other people post in them. Are they ridiculous threads? I think so, but apparently others do not. Are they violating any rules? No.

Now, you may say, but they are annoying or some other amorphous forum rule. And maybe that's the case too. But if we apply that rule to pimpdave's threads, do we also have to apply that rule to a lot of political threads? Especially the political threads that are repetitive?

[pimpdave]

You notice how if you google "Tea Party Death Squad", you now get 3 urban dictionary listings (most likely submitted by PD)

Nope, that's from AoG

, 1 facebook page, started by a guy named "Dave"

What's facebook?

and the a million CC forum topics?

Uh oh, here we go again...

[DoomYoshi]

That thread got locked last I checked mr Adams.

[pimpdave]

Which thread?

[BigBallinStalin]

Alright, let's talk about this then.

pimpdave isn't doing anything that anyone else isn't also doing. A whole lot of us create threads. A lot of us create threads regarding politics. pimpdave's threads generate conversation; other people post in them. Are they ridiculous threads? I think so, but apparently others do not. Are they violating any rules? No.

Now, you may say, but they are annoying or some other amorphous forum rule. And maybe that's the case too. But if we apply that rule to pimpdave's threads, do we also have to apply that rule to a lot of political threads? Especially the political threads that are repetitive?

Ban... EVERYTHING!

[Juan_Bottom]

thegreekdog is in on it. He and Clapper are the head mods of this forum and they're also in pimpdave's McGill usergroup. It's not a coincidence nietzsche. Just look at them member list.

Also, I thought that you pretending to try to blackmail pimpdave was hilarious.

[pimpdave]

Don't forget, lackattack is a member too, and has been since day one, even though he never posts! I even wanted to add AndyDufresne, but you guys all protested because you didn't want mods in there and I had to kick him, so, how deep does this horrible conspiracy go?

The people you mentioned weren't in positions of power when they were added to the group. And since they've banned me twice for six months each in the time since the group even started without also banning the people doing the same thing I was doing, I'm pretty sure it's safe to say that you're full of shit.