[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1091: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Undefined array key 0 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/viewtopic.php on line 1098: Trying to access array offset on null Please answer question before reading posts - Conquer Club
There is no kittens option. Please, without googling, I'd just like to know how many people know what a conker is.
Three's no joke involved, no pun, no gotcha, just this one question, and this member who is asking it being greatly appreciative of everyone who answers. Thanks you.
Please don't post what a conker is. I want as many authentic answers as possible please.
Last edited by Aradhus on Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Symmetry wrote:I'll go with it. I mostly think it's the seed of a horse-chestnut tree. It's a big game for kids in the UK. You find one, pierce it and put in on a length of string, then play conkers. I won't go into the rules.
The other ways I'd understand it, but with more context, would be to say a woman is attractive "Wow, she's a conker", or to say that someone is dead- "conked out" being slang for dying- "Sorry mate, he's a conker".
Staggering.
I answered the question (knowing as I do what a conker is) then scrolled down to see this answer. However, the good news is....you have missed out some very pertinent information regarding the venerable conker.
Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.
Hmm, I've done my level best to redact my post. You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
Last edited by Symmetry on Fri Mar 30, 2012 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
Well Im sorry if I fucked up the game for people.. I edited mine, please edit yours symmetry on what I said in your quote.
I really do have soup to make, adios gang.
It's a puppet that controls Bubbles and hates Ricky.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
wtf are you talking about? I said answer the poll question and then asked pretty fucking nicely if people wouldn't post what the answer is. At what point did I state you were to post a comment saying "no"? You could post whatever the f*ck you wanted as long as it wasn't about a conker. Too fucking complex for you, huh?
Symmetry wrote:
Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.
Hmm, I've done my level best to redact my post. You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.
Rather that than either being too dense to understand a simple request or too much of a prick to not try get a rise out of somebody. Well done symmetry, you pissed soneone off, did it make you feel good? Did you reach your quota for today?
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
wtf are you talking about? I said answer the poll question and then asked pretty fucking nicely if people wouldn't post what the answer is. At what point did I state you were to post a comment saying "no"? You could post whatever the f*ck you wanted as long as it wasn't about a conker. Too fucking complex for you, huh?
Symmetry wrote:
Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.
Hmm, I've done my level best to redact my post. You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.
Rather that than either being too dense to understand a simple request or too much of a prick to not try get a rise out of somebody. Well done symmetry, you pissed soneone off, did it make you feel good? Did you reach your quota for today?
I note that the only place my response still exists is in one of your posts and Fruitcakes' post. Remove your quote, and PM Fruitcake and the problem is largely resolved.
This is me being pretty restrained and accommodating.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
The right answer to the wrong question is still the wrong answer to the real question.
daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
exactly -and dude went into a hissy fit with symmetry and we will never know the answer and we do not care enough to google it.
daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
exactly -and dude went into a hissy fit with symmetry and we will never know the answer and we do not care enough to google it.
I've genuinely not seen anything like it before. I've had some fairly bitchy arguments, and some rough bits with other posters, but this was kind of out of the blue. My OP, and the attempts to correct it, were all done in good faith.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
exactly -and dude went into a hissy fit with symmetry and we will never know the answer and we do not care enough to google it.
I've genuinely not seen anything like it before. I've had some fairly bitchy arguments, and some rough bits with other posters, but this was kind of out of the blue. My OP, and the attempts to correct it, were all done in good faith.
well im more of an asshole than you online here.. and I tried to correct it too... his rules were damn vague at the start.
