Moderator: Community Team

























































Symmetry wrote:Intentionally being a prick

















Symmetry wrote:I'll go with it. I mostly think it's the seed of a horse-chestnut tree. It's a big game for kids in the UK. You find one, pierce it and put in on a length of string, then play conkers. I won't go into the rules.
The other ways I'd understand it, but with more context, would be to say a woman is attractive "Wow, she's a conker", or to say that someone is dead- "conked out" being slang for dying- "Sorry mate, he's a conker".

















Aradhus wrote:Symmetry wrote:[Redacted]



























































Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.




















army of nobunaga wrote:[Redacted]



Symmetry wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:edit
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.

















saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE




















jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...







Symmetry wrote:You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.







natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"








Symmetry wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:[Redacted]
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
Symmetry wrote:Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.
Hmm, I've done my level best to redact my post. You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.

















Aradhus wrote:Symmetry wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:[Redacted]
Apparantly you were supposed to vote in the poll, then post a comment saying "no". That being pretty much the only way the thread wouldn't rapidly descend to the bottom of the forum.
Your post is another valid meaning of the word, however, so expect a degree of flak.
wtf are you talking about? I said answer the poll question and then asked pretty fucking nicely if people wouldn't post what the answer is. At what point did I state you were to post a comment saying "no"? You could post whatever the f*ck you wanted as long as it wasn't about a conker. Too fucking complex for you, huh?Symmetry wrote:Aradhus wrote:Dunno why I've ever defended you symmetry, people were obviously correct. You're just a spiteful prick. And you don't call a woman a conker, or a nose, or any reference to being hit, a 'conker' It's a 'corker'.
Thanks for your wonderful contrifuckingbution.
Hmm, I've done my level best to redact my post. You're kind of being a bit whiny on this.
Rather that than either being too dense to understand a simple request or too much of a prick to not try get a rise out of somebody. Well done symmetry, you pissed soneone off, did it make you feel good? Did you reach your quota for today?




daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.

















army of nobunaga wrote:daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
exactly -and dude went into a hissy fit with symmetry and we will never know the answer and we do not care enough to google it.



Symmetry wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:daddy1gringo wrote:I answered "no". I didn't read the posts, but I did check the flag of the original poster to confirm my suspicion that he is a Brit and this word is one of those Brittish-isms with which us yanks wouldn't be familiar.
exactly -and dude went into a hissy fit with symmetry and we will never know the answer and we do not care enough to google it.
I've genuinely not seen anything like it before. I've had some fairly bitchy arguments, and some rough bits with other posters, but this was kind of out of the blue. My OP, and the attempts to correct it, were all done in good faith.

















Users browsing this forum: jusplay4fun