Conquer Club

Top 10 Reasons Mitt Won't Win and Obama Will Lose

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Who Would You Vote For?

 
Total votes : 0

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby The Bison King on Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:20 pm

oVo wrote:Scotty is envious of Obama's financial security and fully functional ears.

Ten reasons to vote for Mittens
(1) He's always had money, knows how to use it and will single handed fix the World economy.
(2) He's one of the few Americans who can personally afford to finance his own campaign.
(3) He will look after the special interests of the wealthy, who will surely be so grateful
that they will employ everyone who is currently out of work.
(4) If Mittens is elected the one percenters will be confident about their tax cushions,
stop hording all the money and the economy will grow strong again.
(5) Banks will loosen their sphincters and start awarding commercial loans again
with Mittens in the White House to boost their money grubbing egos.
(6) If Mittens is willing to spend his own hard earned money to buy the election
he should be allowed to live in the White House.
(7) A President Mittens would surely let everyone eat cake too.
(8) Mittens knows how to handle his woman; keeping her at home, barefoot and pregnant.
(9) I identify with Mittens because he wears blue jeans just like us common working folk.
(10) Mittens went to the American South, ate the "cheesy grits" and survived the ordeal.
Much like the "Water of Life" in Dune, he endured the ultimate test proving to all
that his true destiny is to rule the Free World.

(11) He's aware that the tree's in Michigan are "the right height"
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class The Bison King
 
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby BigBallinStalin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 7:31 pm

Lootifer wrote:Did you really just call Obama a commie?


Phatsco doesn't need facts or clear definitions. He just needs pictures and bold claims! Communists, such as yourself and me, wouldn't understand.

LET EM RIP, PHATSCOTTY!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:25 pm

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Did you really just call Obama a commie?


Phatsco doesn't need facts or clear definitions. He just needs pictures and bold claims! Communists, such as yourself and me, wouldn't understand.

LET EM RIP, PHATSCOTTY!


Are you in denial? or just uneducated on the matter?
Nice bold claim you made there. Too bad it's completely empty and uninformed.

Mr. Stalin, Obama chose his friends carefully. He "actively sought out the Marxists". I think I can even share a talking picture thingy of a direct quote! Listen to Obama's bold claims, not mine silly!!!




Check mate, mate.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby rdsrds2120 on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:28 pm

He did say Marxist' Professors. What's the context? That might be relevant.

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:29 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:He did say Marxist' Professors. What's the context? That might be relevant.

-rd


The context is MARXIST! :lol:
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby rdsrds2120 on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:34 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:He did say Marxist' Professors. What's the context? That might be relevant.

-rd


The context is MARXIST! :lol:


Image

FRRREEEEDDOMMM!!!!

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Lootifer on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:48 pm

Phatscotty wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:He did say Marxist' Professors. What's the context? That might be relevant.

-rd


The context is MARXIST! :lol:

You say things like this, then get angry when people attack you based on ad hominem arguments... :roll:

An analogy would be the fat welfare woman sitting on the couch complaining about being poor.

(you complain about getting attacked/trolled/etc, maybe if you didnt say such stupid stuff people wouldnt be so harsh on you? /shrug)
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby saxitoxin on Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:49 pm

Phatscotty wrote:BTW new national delegate count for Minnesota is 10 pledged for Paul, 2 for Santorum, 0 for Romney, 0 for Gingrich.

I hear Ron Paul has a shot at winning the delegates in Missouri as well. Stay tuned!


That's good to hear! I understand the State of Washington may be in a similar situation, too.

Phatscotty wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Did you really just call Obama a commie?


Phatsco doesn't need facts or clear definitions. He just needs pictures and bold claims! Communists, such as yourself and me, wouldn't understand.

LET EM RIP, PHATSCOTTY!


Are you in denial? or just uneducated on the matter?
Nice bold claim you made there. Too bad it's completely empty and uninformed.

Mr. Stalin, Obama chose his friends carefully. He "actively sought out the Marxists". I think I can even share a talking picture thingy of a direct quote! Listen to Obama's bold claims, not mine silly!!!




Check mate, mate.


At Oxford, when he - like Obama in this quote - was 21, Rupert Murdoch kept a bust of Comrade Lenin in his apartment and was a member of the Fabian Society. On that basis I guess Rupert Murdoch has as much - possibly more - of a claim to being a communist as Barack Obama. I don't know, maybe he is and is engineering a 50 year conspiracy to lull everyone into a sense of apathy before springing the trap.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Corporal saxitoxin
 
Posts: 13413
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:01 am

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby demonfork on Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:01 pm

Must not be that huge of a fail....Gallup has Romney ahead.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/153902/Romne ... egins.aspx
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class demonfork
 
Posts: 2257
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 4:52 pm
Location: Your mom's house

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby oVo on Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:21 am

Campaigns have already blown $100,000,000
and it's still the primaries.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:06 pm

Lootifer wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
rdsrds2120 wrote:He did say Marxist' Professors. What's the context? That might be relevant.

-rd


The context is MARXIST! :lol:

You say things like this, then get angry when people attack you based on ad hominem arguments... :roll:

An analogy would be the fat welfare woman sitting on the couch complaining about being poor.

(you complain about getting attacked/trolled/etc, maybe if you didnt say such stupid stuff people wouldnt be so harsh on you? /shrug)


I don't get angry. Plus, it was a joke.
Last edited by Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:10 pm

saxitoxin wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:BTW new national delegate count for Minnesota is 10 pledged for Paul, 2 for Santorum, 0 for Romney, 0 for Gingrich.

I hear Ron Paul has a shot at winning the delegates in Missouri as well. Stay tuned!


That's good to hear! I understand the State of Washington may be in a similar situation, too.

Phatscotty wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Lootifer wrote:Did you really just call Obama a commie?


Phatsco doesn't need facts or clear definitions. He just needs pictures and bold claims! Communists, such as yourself and me, wouldn't understand.

LET EM RIP, PHATSCOTTY!


Are you in denial? or just uneducated on the matter?
Nice bold claim you made there. Too bad it's completely empty and uninformed.

Mr. Stalin, Obama chose his friends carefully. He "actively sought out the Marxists". I think I can even share a talking picture thingy of a direct quote! Listen to Obama's bold claims, not mine silly!!!




Check mate, mate.


At Oxford, when he - like Obama in this quote - was 21, Rupert Murdoch kept a bust of Comrade Lenin in his apartment and was a member of the Fabian Society. On that basis I guess Rupert Murdoch has as much - possibly more - of a claim to being a communist as Barack Obama. I don't know, maybe he is and is engineering a 50 year conspiracy to lull everyone into a sense of apathy before springing the trap.


There is one difference. Obama still has Marxist overtones. I wonder if anyone disagrees with that?
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:11 pm

Image
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby rdsrds2120 on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:34 pm

Phatscotty wrote:Image


I can't tell if you're legitimately trying to use that picture to prove your point, or if you're joking again.

-rd
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class rdsrds2120
 
Posts: 6274
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:42 am

Re: Top 10 Reasons Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:43 pm

rdsrds2120 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Image


I can't tell if you're legitimately trying to use that picture to prove your point, or if you're joking again.

-rd


It's a take on the main street view of the economy, doesn't look good. I suppose it's only a joke if the 35 people out of work are in the mood for laughing.

I doubt it
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Mitt Romney Won't Win

Postby Phatscotty on Thu Apr 19, 2012 7:46 pm

#10: Romney's main success stories are Staples and Dominos. These companies pay very poorly and are not a model for the economy as a whole -- at least, not an economy most of us would want to live in. Would you want to try to raise a family delivering pizzas for Dominos? To Romney, the plight of low wage workers is a theoretical one. His response to earning less that a hundred grand a year would probably be to take out a huge loan —but unlike Paul Cellucci, he could pay it off by cashing in a CD!

#9: One of the reasons Romney lost his bid for the Senate was the embarrassing revelations about how Bain treated employees at Ampad (also known as American Pad & Paper Co.), and in the wake of Enron, Worldcom, and Global Crossing, this may be just as embarrassing: Romney's company, Bain Capital, is being sued over possible defrauding of investors. Despite Ampad's bankruptcy, Bain walked out with a $50 million profit. Romney did not own stock in Ampad personally, but as vice president of Bain, he was surely aware of the overly rosy financial projections used to sell the stock to small investors. The 1996 stock offering sparked charges of insider trading and accounting fraud. Sound familiar?

#8: Speaking od fraud, remember all the scandals over the Salt Lake Olympics? They didn't end when Romney took over! Not only are the central figures in the Salt Lake Olympics bidding scandal likely to get off scot-free, the organizers paid them handsomely to go away. Tom Welch got a $1 million severance fee from SLOC and Dave Johnson reported $200,000. And unless a federal appeals court allows prosecutors to bring bribery, fraud, and racketeering charges against them, Welch and Johnson won't even stand trial. This "severance pay," several times what a typical Massachusetts worker earns in a year, came out of the small "profit" Romney and the SLOC eked out of the Olympics thanks to all the private donations and government handouts ("corporate welfare").

#7: Romney was only able to "save" the Olympics because of huge giveaways. The Utah congressional delegation strong-armed the Parks service to give pristine parkland to a multimillionaire to develop the skiing venue for free, despite the fact that he will make millions off it in the future. Most of the workers at the event forked for free, so the Salt Lake Olympic Committee (SLOC) didn't even have to pay the minimum wage most employees of Romney companies make. Maybe Romney thinks if he adks nicely, state troopers, garbage collectors, and teachers will work for free to make him look good!

#6: Romney said he "didn't notice" that Utah had him listed as a resident and gave him a $38,000 break on his property taxes. Anyone think he would have noticed a $38,000 increase? Did he illegally try to claim both states as his residence in order to maintain eligibility to run for office both places? We'll never know, because he refuses to release his income tax statements.

#5: Romney has no governmental experience at all. Zero. He had a message on his web site saying, "Romney to Legislature: Get Back in Session Now!" Like his confusion in the debates over the duties of a treasurer, he doesn't seem to understand the duties of governor or the legislature, He seems to think the governor is a CEO that can order the legislature around and fire them. Earth to Romney: the legislature is an elected body that doesn't answer to you. As for lowering taxes without cutting services, Romney thinks all you have to do to pay for something is go to the federal government and ask for a handout. After all, it worked for the Olympics!

#4: Romney's lack of experience doesn't make him an outsider. though. He is surrounded by advisors and other insiders from the Weld and Bush camps. Remember "the mess on Beacon Hill" and "we need change on Beacon Hill"? Well, we've had 12 years of Republican governors. If it's time for a change, vote for someone else!

#3: Romney thinks he is too important to pay dues. His only campaigns have been for U.S. Senate and Governor of Massachusetts. Considering his ties to the Bush white house, it's very possible that he only views the governor's office in Massachusetts as a stepping stone to the 2008 presidential race.

#2: Romney lied. He said he would not run against Swift, then he did, forcing her out of the race. Then he said he would not choose a running mate, but would let the Republican party choose one. Then he chose Kerry Healey and spend millions of dollars selling her to the public, capsizing Jim Rappaport's campaign with massive spending. And we're supposed to believe him when he says he's "not in this race for the rich"?

And the #1 reason not to vote for Mitt Romney is:

Romney is making a big deal of "not being in this race for the rich," but where have you seen Romney bumper stickers and yard signs? Mostly on luxury cars and SUVs and in the yards of mansions, high-priced condos, and big businesses. And who does he think he's fooling with his "made for the press" tries at pumping gas or selling hot dogs? How many of you have such perfectly coiffed hair and impeccably tailored blue jeans without a stain, tear, or patch? Romney is just plain out of touch!
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Mitt Won't Win

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:58 pm

Ninety-two percent (92%) believe it is important to place strict limits on government so that it cannot take away individual rights and freedom. In fact, 54% believe that strict limits on government are even more important than ensuring voters have the right to select government leaders.

(Place attack on person defending freedom here, and continue being happy your own freedoms continue to get whittled away)

To help the economy, 70% of voters believe the government should cut spending. Only 17% want an increase in government spending. (Progressives make up 18% of population)

Only twenty-seven percent (27%) believe the United States is generally heading in the right direction. That’s down two points from a week ago and down seven from the 2012 peak reached in early February.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Top 10 Reasons Mitt Won't Win

Postby BigBallinStalin on Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:29 pm

68% of all statistics are false.
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: Top 10 Reasons Mitt Won't Win and Obama Will Lose

Postby Phatscotty on Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:14 pm



Remaking America? Into what? At least we know for sure it's not Socialism!
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: zainalara