Conquer Club

Skyrim Mafia Endgame: Hail Sithis! (3/18) Skyrim Wins!

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby Iron Butterfly on Mon May 07, 2012 6:37 am

dazza2008 wrote:
jak111 wrote:
dazza2008 wrote:
jak111 wrote:Fine by me, though my vote will not be lifted until another case is presented (Which in our fight let pretty much everyone slip by without much or nothing). Again, tomorrow I'm calling out inactives.

As for the aggressiveness, check my Meta game style ;) It's how I roll.


It is how you roll but that is not a good thing. It makes you very active but just frustrates everyone else and makes them not want to post.

Every game is the same with you. You argue for the sake of arguing and how can anyone join in? You make little sense.


And if I wasn't aggressive we'd still be in joke vote stage with only a week left ;) It annoys people but deep down inside they like it ;P


So before you started playing games here they stayed in joke stage forever?


:lol: We would surely all be lost without his guidance.
User avatar
Captain Iron Butterfly
 
Posts: 2711
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby kageryuu on Mon May 07, 2012 8:50 am

pancakemix wrote:
pancakemix wrote:
kageryuu wrote:Well I am glad that argument is done.

It was interesting but was getting a little bit longwinded lol.


Can we not write in dragon script anymore? Please.


EBWOP


understood no more dragonscript
User avatar
Private kageryuu
 
Posts: 0
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 1:52 am

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby ghostly447 on Mon May 07, 2012 8:54 am

Oh, this game is finally getting out of the joke stage which it should have about 5 pages ago when everyone was on their knees begging for the pain to stop.

As far as my vote I will not be placing it anywehre yet. To me, the PCM v Jak case seemed more like a Town v Town argument. They both responded pretty well and if anything it is a case that needs to simmer down and have both sides wait for a major slip to bring back the case and hopefully pin them with a stronger bit of evidence. I dont like forcing a claim with weak evidence.

It doesnt sit well with me that Jak admitted he would scim, especially while he is trying to make a case and a argue his point.

As for another case, I will try to find one today when I have more time unless someone can go back and find a stronger one to go off of before I do.
User avatar
Cadet ghostly447
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 11:18 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon May 07, 2012 9:05 am

Iron Butterfly wrote:
dazza2008 wrote:
jak111 wrote:
dazza2008 wrote:
jak111 wrote:Fine by me, though my vote will not be lifted until another case is presented (Which in our fight let pretty much everyone slip by without much or nothing). Again, tomorrow I'm calling out inactives.

As for the aggressiveness, check my Meta game style ;) It's how I roll.


It is how you roll but that is not a good thing. It makes you very active but just frustrates everyone else and makes them not want to post.

Every game is the same with you. You argue for the sake of arguing and how can anyone join in? You make little sense.


And if I wasn't aggressive we'd still be in joke vote stage with only a week left ;) It annoys people but deep down inside they like it ;P


So before you started playing games here they stayed in joke stage forever?


:lol: We would surely all be lost without his guidance.



Unvote since Kager was just a joke vote. Reading the last several pages reminds me a lot of an old mafia game called Robin Hood where myself and AD went at it for a while when he tried to lynch me until I finally had to give out my role to stop a lynch since I did start going with some silly comments such as ignoring "idiots" and other stuff. Jak saying you will ignore so and so in a game is counter productive to finding the scum out since they may have a scum slip up or actually give good evidence later in the game that can help us win the game. As such I'll give you a FOS, but won't vote you at this time.

In regards to getting us on to serious posts, it has never happened in any game that I ever played where it never wound up going to a serious point and leading to a lynch on Day 1 although Robin Hood came close with about 80 pages of stuff on day 1.

Ghostly as painful as it was to read that, imagine doing that for about 50 more pages before we finally just lynched one of the two that kept drawing it out in Robin Hood.

Dragon script is not needed in here since some if not most of us don't know how to read that script.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby nagerous on Mon May 07, 2012 9:08 am

The whole of day 1 is a joke anyway, there is nothing really to go off on. Instead we get pages normally of people feeling frustrated and arguing with each other, with accusations of skimming, inactivity, bandwagoning, fence-sitting, over aggressive-ness, under aggressiveness thrown about like nobodies business. Normally the most annoying player happens to be the one lynched, and rarely is he actually scum. At the moment jak is doing a good job of fitting that bill, particularly with his moronic comments like the fact that he will skim all of PCM's posts on that issue. Kageryuu sits second in my book, for posting something that won't even display on my computer which is highly frustrating. Then we have dazza who is moaning about a little bit of chat about the actual game the the mafia is based upon! However, whilst these are annoying I wouldn't say they were scummy.
Image
User avatar
Captain nagerous
 
Posts: 7513
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 7:39 am

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby pancakemix on Mon May 07, 2012 10:42 am

ghostly447 wrote:Oh, this game is finally getting out of the joke stage which it should have about 5 pages ago when everyone was on their knees begging for the pain to stop.

As far as my vote I will not be placing it anywehre yet. To me, the PCM v Jak case seemed more like a Town v Town argument. They both responded pretty well and if anything it is a case that needs to simmer down and have both sides wait for a major slip to bring back the case and hopefully pin them with a stronger bit of evidence. I dont like forcing a claim with weak evidence.

It doesnt sit well with me that Jak admitted he would scim, especially while he is trying to make a case and a argue his point.

As for another case, I will try to find one today when I have more time unless someone can go back and find a stronger one to go off of before I do.


What was this then?

ghostly447 wrote:I dont like hopping on BW's, especially since I just got back, but Jak overall seems to be conveying more of a scummy case. PCM broke it down to the point where it became clear Jak had really no case. The thing that gets me the most is the Jak will now refuse to throw any sort of response at PCM because PCM cant find solid evidence...On D1...But last time I checked, a case proven completely false=....Evidence.

So with that, I will unvote if needed and vote Jak

I hope this is a good enough post. From what I could tell, there wasnt much more I could add that hasnt been said. I just got back and havent been on for about 40-46 hours, so thats all ive got for now! But I plan to get more active.
Epic Win

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember." - Richard Roma, Glengarry Glen Ross

aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class pancakemix
 
Posts: 7973
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:39 pm
Location: The Grim Guzzler

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby XenHu on Mon May 07, 2012 3:59 pm

Interesting. Freudian slip perhaps?

Think it was Jak who mentioned calling out 'in-actives'(no, don't start that argument again) and off the top of my head, it's been awhile since we've heard from Clever, hasn't it?

-X
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby dazza2008 on Mon May 07, 2012 4:15 pm

nagerous wrote:Then we have dazza who is moaning about a little bit of chat about the actual game the the mafia is based upon!


I know you are not saying it is scummy, but was I really moaning about it? All I said is that I don't know/care about what is better. That is not moaning it is just stating my feelings on the topic. I wanted to get to playing the game and we have now so happy days.
Image
User avatar
Corporal dazza2008
 
Posts: 1750
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 2:50 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby Iron Butterfly on Mon May 07, 2012 4:38 pm

nagerous wrote:The whole of day 1 is a joke anyway, there is nothing really to go off on. Instead we get pages normally of people feeling frustrated and arguing with each other, with accusations of skimming, inactivity, bandwagoning, fence-sitting, over aggressive-ness, under aggressiveness thrown about like nobodies business. Normally the most annoying player happens to be the one lynched, and rarely is he actually scum. At the moment jak is doing a good job of fitting that bill, particularly with his moronic comments like the fact that he will skim all of PCM's posts on that issue. Kageryuu sits second in my book, for posting something that won't even display on my computer which is highly frustrating. Then we have dazza who is moaning about a little bit of chat about the actual game the the mafia is based upon! However, whilst these are annoying I wouldn't say they were scummy.


Day one really is a case of damned if you do and damned if you don't.

I have really come to understand that on day one, unless there is a major miscue on someones part scumslip wise, strong cases will not be built. As the game progresses it becomes easier to catch the lies and misteps of others from town night actions and astute observation.
User avatar
Captain Iron Butterfly
 
Posts: 2711
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:10 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby jak111 on Mon May 07, 2012 5:10 pm

ghostly447 wrote:It doesnt sit well with me that Jak admitted he would scim, especially while he is trying to make a case and a argue his point.


LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Jak saying you will ignore so and so in a game is counter productive to finding the scum out since they may have a scum slip up or actually give good evidence later in the game that can help us win the game. As such I'll give you a FOS, but won't vote you at this time.


Not going to pick a fight with these two but I just want to clear things up for them. YES I said I'd skim. But not every single post. If you read it, only posts regarding the fight would be skimmed until he can bring new evidence against me to the table or I can bring new evidence against him. Obviously I knew people were getting tired of it, but I swear, I'm damned if I do do something, and I'm damned if I don't. I made a case to start D1 seriously, I got fought with. If I didn't, I'd be fought with because it wouldn't 'fit' me or they'd call me out for not contributing. I tried to forcefully stop the argument that had no new information coming in, especially with people being inactive and using it as an excuse for not posting (Yes an argument can be annoying, that's why.. excuse my language... you man the f*ck up and bring something to the table instead of being bystanders, not judging if that's how you roll, but if you're going to complain about people actually doing something when you complain earlier that no one's doing anything then I have a problem with you). But if I didn't try and stop it people would continue to whine.

Math talk: If Statements
If I bring up a case, then people will be pissed.
If people are pissed, then I bring up a case.

I talk a lot and lead the days into discussion IFF people are inactive/not contributing.
End of Math talk

So for those complaining "Oh aggressiveness is not a good thing" Yadda yadda yadda, then actually be active and show me how a 'good' player plays, or do they sit on the side lines the entire game because they don't want to PLAY it?

Not to sound rude, but any more complaints about how I choose to play when others are slacking off (which is true to a point, there's some that are active always, but I mean the ones that aren't), then I'll start complaining and being on you ass for how you play or NOT play, depending whom it is. Sorry if you find me offensive, sorry if I get in people's faces, sorry if I am wrong at times, but guess what. Not many of you even attempt to try at the game (which I mean in the kindest way I can <.< >.>), I'm a gamer to the death, and when I play games I PLAY them whether or not you like that fact, there's the door, make sure to close it on your way out.

Sorry for my ranting guys, I'm just tired of people attacking how I approach a game when they don't approach it at all unless the heat is on someone else and they can hide in attacking them. If you really think it's bad to get into a game and be active then lynch me, because I can guarantee that as long as I live, I'm going to be aggressive, spark conversations, point people out, piss people off (which I don't mean to but actually playing the game seems to do that), and actually try my best to win the game for town while having fun doing it. Which no offense guys, but a few of you got your panties in a knot at times, just saying.

Now then.. I think I'm done ranting, I swear, I plan to type a single sentence or two and I go right off in peoples faces... Time to post my list of inactives (whether or not they are vacationing they are on the list)

Bounty List
~Edocsil - Hasn't reported in for 3 days, hasn't spoken since the conversation turned serious.
~LSU - Before his latest post, hasn't spoken for 5 days. Activity needs to see an increase in the next few days or so.
~New Guy - Hasn't reported in for 4 days, still was in the joke vote stage.
~jrl/soundman - Whichever one is in the game (either jrl, or soundman replaced him) neither has commented on the game. (This is more of a case I think the mod should be looking at!)

Besides the those 4 everyone seems pretty active or at least posted daily.

My thoughts on the 4:
~Edoc - Could be pressured
~New Guy - Should be pressured
~LSU - Needs to up his activity
~jrl/soundman - Mod needs pressure ;)
Highest Rank:
Major:2157

"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers"

Jak Eliminator: Prison Riot [0/16] *Sign Ups*
User avatar
Private 1st Class jak111
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: At your deathbed.

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 7:07 pm

Yep, sorry to say I have the same reasoning for being gone as ghostly, just been out alot and dont have much to add. Instead of posting last night I was too tired to do so and so just read up and fell asleep. And I dont want to start a shit storm by posting things that have already been posted before, and so I will just write up on current events. For jak, I can see why he gets pissed off because he is pressured just about every game Ive been in with him. As for Iron Butterfly's post on being damned whether you post or not, I have found that I never really get the hang of the joke voting and so when I do post regularly I find I am pressured much more then when I am quiet. Therefore whether I am town or not it helps to keep me from having to claim, therefore keeping me from revealing powerroles and whatnot. This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby everywhere116 on Mon May 07, 2012 7:08 pm

Soundman replaced jrl333
"Disease, suffering, hardship...that is what war is all about."-Captain Kirk, from "A Taste of Armageddon"
User avatar
Corporal everywhere116
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Somewhere on this big blue marble.

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby / on Mon May 07, 2012 7:37 pm

Really newguy? Was it necessary to declare you are not a VT? Does that help town in any way? FOS for that

I'm willing to go for inactives I suppose, Vote edoc, the few posts he has made are one liners, he did the same in the recently ended Two Sides as godfather/miller.
Sergeant 1st Class /
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 7:39 pm

/ wrote:Really newguy? Was it necessary to declare you are not a VT? Does that help town in any way? FOS for that

I'm willing to go for inactives I suppose, Vote edoc, the few posts he has made are one liners, he did the same in the recently ended Two Sides as godfather/miller.


Well it is a hint, as I said. Of course that could be a clever rouse to get mafia to waste a nightkill.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby / on Mon May 07, 2012 7:41 pm

definition of hint: "A brief or indirect suggestion", "I am hinting I am not x" is not a hint, it's a mind screw. :P
Sergeant 1st Class /
 
Posts: 484
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 2:41 am

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby edocsil on Mon May 07, 2012 7:45 pm

At jaks request, I am in fact here. I have been busy irl, notice a similar drop in my other threads as well. Not sure if I would really call this conversation "serious" yet, but w/e. There isn't anything worth pouncing on at the moment so I haven't had anything to say. I was only adding to the off topic chatter so I decided to shut up for a moment and see what happens.


new guy1 wrote:Yep, sorry to say I have the same reasoning for being gone as ghostly, just been out alot and dont have much to add. Instead of posting last night I was too tired to do so and so just read up and fell asleep. And I dont want to start a shit storm by posting things that have already been posted before, and so I will just write up on current events. For jak, I can see why he gets pissed off because he is pressured just about every game Ive been in with him. As for Iron Butterfly's post on being damned whether you post or not, I have found that I never really get the hang of the joke voting and so when I do post regularly I find I am pressured much more then when I am quiet. Therefore whether I am town or not it helps to keep me from having to claim, therefore keeping me from revealing powerroles and whatnot. This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.


This however, is worth jumping on. There was no need for this softclaim and all it would do is make you a scum target at night. To me it screams of a scum with a solid fake who is trying to set up for when he is eventually forced to claim. Scum likely need to worry about NKs as much as the town in this game, Cant exactly see the Dovahkiin being a VT or something. Dollars to doughnuts says he is a vig.


Also, holy fastpost. Not going to further reply to accusations of inactivity, as I am not about to get lynch over them.
Edoc'sil

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.

zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class edocsil
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 7:46 pm

/ wrote:definition of hint: "A brief or indirect suggestion", "I am hinting I am not x" is not a hint, it's a mind screw. :P


Sorry, I guess I didnt give a hint, just anti-soft claimed then. Haha.

fastposted- I have already posted that it could be a rouse.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby edocsil on Mon May 07, 2012 7:48 pm

yearg. Too much wifom to argue that point.

Also Unvote Vote NG1 as I intended.
Edoc'sil

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.

zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class edocsil
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 7:52 pm

edocsil wrote:yearg. Too much wifom to argue that point.

Also Unvote Vote NG1 as I intended.


I guess I cant argue that. This is why I dont talk much day one, the first thing I say always seems scummy to people when I dont think twice about it :roll:.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby XenHu on Mon May 07, 2012 8:22 pm

new guy1 wrote:Yep, sorry to say I have the same reasoning for being gone as ghostly, just been out alot and dont have much to add. Instead of posting last night I was too tired to do so and so just read up and fell asleep. And I dont want to start a shit storm by posting things that have already been posted before, and so I will just write up on current events. For jak, I can see why he gets pissed off because he is pressured just about every game Ive been in with him. As for Iron Butterfly's post on being damned whether you post or not, I have found that I never really get the hang of the joke voting and so when I do post regularly I find I am pressured much more then when I am quiet. Therefore whether I am town or not it helps to keep me from having to claim, therefore keeping me from revealing powerroles and whatnot. This is hinting Im not a VT, as when Im a VT I speak alot more as I dont have much to lose.


Oh. Wow. Nope, that's not hinting. You might as well have hung a sign. You do realize that if you're alive tomorrow, there are going to be a lot of questions. Really, the mafia can play us like violins for another day if you think about it. Let you live, we waste a day either lynching you, or going back and forth about it until we end up(possibly) lynching someone else. Kill you in the night and, well, either we've lost an important role, or we've lost just another body.


new guy1 wrote:Well it is a hint, as I said. Of course that could be a clever rouse to get mafia to waste a nightkill.


IMO, no nightkill is wasted. A kill is a kill, and at the very least, it's one less town(Albeit, I've never been a fan of abiding a village idiot :P). Now, as I've said, no knowledge of the setting, but it sounds like we are dealing with three sides here, just going off of the flavor text posted by Mod. Which means that there are probably some odd VCs(Victory Conditions) out there.

Jesus, ain't this just a peach.

-X
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby XenHu on Mon May 07, 2012 8:27 pm

new guy1 wrote:For jak, I can see why he gets pissed off because he is pressured just about every game Ive been in with him.


Just wanting to add, whether this is true or not, I don't really see how that should carry over into every new game that's played. I've never played with him, does that mean he gets to be aggressive with me too? Because that's just stupid.

-X
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 8:30 pm

Yep. I got the part where it was a stupid decision to post that from edoc, you really didnt need to go into detail on it. And yep, Im sure now that you posted how mafia could just play this like a violin thats exactly what they will do. Thanks for pointing it out to everyone.

fastposted- I dont know, he just seems to be pressured first pretty much every game I play with him.
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby XenHu on Mon May 07, 2012 8:33 pm

new guy1 wrote:Yep. I got the part where it was a stupid decision to post that from edoc, you really didnt need to go into detail on it. And yep, Im sure now that you posted how mafia could just play this like a violin thats exactly what they will do. Thanks for pointing it out to everyone.



Yeah, you know, you're quite welcome. :roll: I mean, come on! If the mafia aren't a bag of bricks, of course that's what they'll do! It's not rocket science! They already have the gun, you gave them the bullets, not me. Don't try and spin this into something it isn't.

-X
User avatar
Cook XenHu
 
Posts: 4307
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:38 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby new guy1 on Mon May 07, 2012 8:35 pm

XenHu wrote:
new guy1 wrote:Yep. I got the part where it was a stupid decision to post that from edoc, you really didnt need to go into detail on it. And yep, Im sure now that you posted how mafia could just play this like a violin thats exactly what they will do. Thanks for pointing it out to everyone.



Yeah, you know, you're quite welcome. :roll: I mean, come on! If the mafia aren't a bag of bricks, of course that's what they'll do! It's not rocket science! They already have the gun, you gave them the bullets, not me. Don't try and spin this into something it isn't.

-X


If I was going to spin it onto you then I would have FOS'ed and followed with a case. I realize I am the one to blame here, but if you dont plan to pursue it then drop it, if you want a claim and possibly lynchee, then convince everyone else that they should vote for me. Quit being so paranoid dude!
User avatar
Sergeant new guy1
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Skyrim Mafia Day 1: Diplomatic Immunity (18/18)

Postby edocsil on Mon May 07, 2012 8:36 pm

new guy1 wrote:Yep. I got the part where it was a stupid decision to post that from edoc, you really didnt need to go into detail on it. And yep, Im sure now that you posted how mafia could just play this like a violin thats exactly what they will do. Thanks for pointing it out to everyone.

fastposted- I dont know, he just seems to be pressured first pretty much every game I play with him.


Screw it, he isn't scum. I'm calling meta on this one, I don't think he intended as much WIFOM as I elaborated. I have played enough with him that I think I can say he isn't there yet. Unvote
It was just a bad move, and one that is unlikely to be repeated.
Edoc'sil

Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.

zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class edocsil
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:09 am
Location: The Great State Of Minnesota

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users