Moderator: Community Team
Phatscotty wrote:sure universal healthcare sounds like a wonderful idea! until you think about it...
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:sure universal healthcare sounds like a wonderful idea! until you think about it...
Or until you've seen it in practice working efficiently, covering everyone, at less cost to the tax payer, in every other industrialised nation, and with better results.
Scotty- be honest, if I presented to you a system that covered every citizen, cost less in terms of tax payer money by half, was proven to be popular wherever implemented, didn't discourage medical advances, saved lives and increased life expectancy, would you really object?
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:sure universal healthcare sounds like a wonderful idea! until you think about it...
Or until you've seen it in practice working efficiently, covering everyone, at less cost to the tax payer, in every other industrialised nation, and with better results.
Scotty- be honest, if I presented to you a system that covered every citizen, cost less in terms of tax payer money by half, was proven to be popular wherever implemented, didn't discourage medical advances, saved lives and increased life expectancy, would you really object?
Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:sure universal healthcare sounds like a wonderful idea! until you think about it...
Or until you've seen it in practice working efficiently, covering everyone, at less cost to the tax payer, in every other industrialised nation, and with better results.
Scotty- be honest, if I presented to you a system that covered every citizen, cost less in terms of tax payer money by half, was proven to be popular wherever implemented, didn't discourage medical advances, saved lives and increased life expectancy, would you really object?
Has it ever "worked" (although your definition of worked is questionable considering there are always anecdotal stories against it) in a country with 300+ million people (including 11 million illegals) that already leads the world in medical research and innovation? Will that research and innovation continue when the government runs everything? How will prices go down in the US when our country can't feed off the hard work of the other countries (like the current socialized healthcare countries do)?
Phatscotty wrote:You don't understand anything about America, for the millionth time.
Symmetry wrote:Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:sure universal healthcare sounds like a wonderful idea! until you think about it...
Or until you've seen it in practice working efficiently, covering everyone, at less cost to the tax payer, in every other industrialised nation, and with better results.
Scotty- be honest, if I presented to you a system that covered every citizen, cost less in terms of tax payer money by half, was proven to be popular wherever implemented, didn't discourage medical advances, saved lives and increased life expectancy, would you really object?
Has it ever "worked" (although your definition of worked is questionable considering there are always anecdotal stories against it) in a country with 300+ million people (including 11 million illegals) that already leads the world in medical research and innovation? Will that research and innovation continue when the government runs everything? How will prices go down in the US when our country can't feed off the hard work of the other countries (like the current socialized healthcare countries do)?
Hmm, you ask a lot of questions. I feel that you decided the answer before you asked the questions, but I'll try to answer them fairly, rather than in the spirit they were asked.
1) "Has it ever worked?"- Universal healthcare is the standard in every developed nation, bar the US, which faces a massive healthcare problem.
2) "Has it ever worked in [the US]"? I'm assuming you were being sarcastic, or frivolous with this question. I'll answer honestly though- it's never been tried in the US. Saying that it will never work seems pretty dumb if your basis is that the US has a unique set of problems given that nations as diverse as Israel and Canada do alright.
3) Innovation. This kind of baffles me. From my experience conversing with you I know you have a background in Chemistry. Do you really feel that government investment in sciences stifles innovation. This is perhaps the point I find most difficult to reconcile in terms of your professed experiences and your politics. You know that countries with universal healthcare produce excellent scientific advancements.
If you ignore any of my questions, please don't ignore this one-
NightStrike, have you ever lived in a country with Universal Healthcare?
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:You don't understand anything about America, for the millionth time.
You're so cute when you can't use your words. I'll wait for you to come out of your "Sym isn't even American" corner, and calm down. Then let's have a chat.
Night Strike wrote:NightStrike, have you ever lived in a country with Universal Healthcare?
Nope, and I wouldn't want to. If I have a medical issue, I like being able to see a doctor promptly and not have the government choose whether or not they will cover a procedure. And I like the freedom of making my own health care choices instead of handing those choices over to the government.
And where's the massive health care problem in the US? There's a massive problem with the government interfering with the health care market, yet we still have the best health care in the world. Just because it's expensive doesn't make it bad. And there are plenty of ways to reduce the cost of health care, and many of them involve cutting the involvement of the government, not expanding it.
Night Strike wrote:So why do you care what kind of health care system we have in the US? You can keep your socialized healthcare, and we can keep our freedom. And we can both be happy.
Unless you're not actually happy with your system and want to make sure we join you in a poor system.
Night Strike wrote:So why do you care what kind of health care system we have in the US? You can keep your socialized healthcare, and we can keep our freedom. And we can both be happy.
Unless you're not actually happy with your system and want to make sure we join you in a poor system.
Symmetry wrote:Night Strike wrote:So why do you care what kind of health care system we have in the US? You can keep your socialized healthcare, and we can keep our freedom. And we can both be happy.
Unless you're not actually happy with your system and want to make sure we join you in a poor system.
Why are you so hot and bothered about a non-American system being superior to an American system? You seem genuinely upset if I suggest that one of the several healthcare systems I've lived under is better than the US system.
I don't get it, you pay more, get less, cover fewer people, have more government spending, and you claim that you're more free. From what?
Free from regular scans for breast cancer?
Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:Night Strike wrote:So why do you care what kind of health care system we have in the US? You can keep your socialized healthcare, and we can keep our freedom. And we can both be happy.
Unless you're not actually happy with your system and want to make sure we join you in a poor system.
Why are you so hot and bothered about a non-American system being superior to an American system? You seem genuinely upset if I suggest that one of the several healthcare systems I've lived under is better than the US system.
I don't get it, you pay more, get less, cover fewer people, have more government spending, and you claim that you're more free. From what?
Free from regular scans for breast cancer?
I'm hot and bothered about trying to replace our freedoms with government control. When government controls health care, they can make any other decision about your life that they choose to make. All while providing less and less care, especially the expensive treatments that our country is great at providing. You can't find expensive treatment in countries where the government makes all the decisions.
Symmetry wrote:NS, do you solely speak now in the language of bumper stickers and soundbites? I know that you can't believe the stuff you say. I'm not sure I've ever seen another poster so without a personality beyond a partisan political message.
Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:NS, do you solely speak now in the language of bumper stickers and soundbites? I know that you can't believe the stuff you say. I'm not sure I've ever seen another poster so without a personality beyond a partisan political message.
What's wrong with believing in right and wrong? And the truth is more than just soundbites. If you want to hear soundbites that are completely void of truth, you should listen to an Obama speech. Freedom isn't partisan.
Symmetry wrote:Night Strike wrote:Symmetry wrote:NS, do you solely speak now in the language of bumper stickers and soundbites? I know that you can't believe the stuff you say. I'm not sure I've ever seen another poster so without a personality beyond a partisan political message.
What's wrong with believing in right and wrong? And the truth is more than just soundbites. If you want to hear soundbites that are completely void of truth, you should listen to an Obama speech. Freedom isn't partisan.
All but your third sentence were lovely bumper stickers. The third was a weird attack on Obama reflected off of the criticism I leveled at you, or- if you like- a weird "I know your are, but what am I then", kind of thing.
Is there a NighstStrike still in there that goes beyond stating positions that can easily fit on the rear end of a car?
Phatscotty wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:Symm, you chimin in from my challenge at the top of the previous page, or you duckin n weavin? Getting the thread to the next page doesn't make the scary ideas go away
Here is one of those links you were asking for. Let me know what you think. I think you will learn more here in 7 minutes than you have over your entire life.
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symm, you chimin in from my challenge at the top of the previous page, or you duckin n weavin? Getting the thread to the next page doesn't make the scary ideas go away
Here is one of those links you were asking for. Let me know what you think. I think you will learn more here in 7 minutes than you have over your entire life.
Look, sorry dude, I've done this script with your links before.
1) Scotty: Hey this is relevant! Watch it!, I won't say how, or what it's relevant to!
2) Me: Meh
3) Scottty: I can't believe you didn't watch my 10-30 minutes video You're dodging.
Dude, just tell me your argument, and post the vids as support.
Don't be a dickhead and think that if I watch everything you like I'll agree with you. Is that fair?
Symmetry wrote:Scotty, I think I might have gotten to the route of your misunderstandings. Did you know that all of the people you've been arguing against all this time haven't simply been underlining random parts of their posts?
They've been providing links to evidence, support, facts, or opinions that backed up their arguments.
Phatscotty wrote:Ya know, I knew if I gave you a link, you would ignore it. You asked me for it!
Don't ever ask me for a link again
Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Ya know, I knew if I gave you a link, you would ignore it. You asked me for it!
Don't ever ask me for a link again
What did i do to get that response?
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS