Don't Worry, It's OK to Degrade Conservative Women...

[BigBallinStalin]

HOW MANY FINGERS AM I HOLDING UP? HUH!? HUH!?

ANSWER ME. NOW!

[InkL0sed]

That sounds nothing like attacks on successful, articulate liberal women. Critiques of, say, Rachel Maddow have all been directly aimed at her ideas and goals. Wasn't there some evolutionary failure calling Maddow a hag around here?

Indeed, most political attacks on women tend to be sexual in nature, and are disgusting on all fronts. Welcome to actual feminism, Night Strike! Oh, wait, you're going to make this a liberal vs. conservative thing, aren't you?

Fast posted by Greek. I would expect most outlets to frown on this sort of thing, but they won't, except Fox News, who will use it as some sort of one-up, I'm sure. Better than ignoring it, for what that's worth.

Fast posted by another sex-shamer too.

I love you so much.

[Neoteny]

We both know you're just after the truck.

[InkL0sed]

IT'S SO PRETTY

[natty dread]

There's no question that people can be idiots on both sides (and center) of the political spectrum. Using sexual attacks on women, instead of attacking/debating their actual opinions, is idiotic, no matter if the woman is "conservative" or "liberal". Ignoring someone's opinions and only attacking them because of their gender is wrong. Conservative women should have their opinions challenged and debated, but even if their opinions are stupid, that doesn't justify sexually harrassing them.


As a side note, however, there would be nothing wrong if said woman wanted to willingly pose in nude or sexy pictures on any magazine or whatever. Everyone has the right to decide about their own body, and I have nothing against women who are comfortable with their own sexuality.

Looking at Rachel Maddow, I don't think they would post a pic of her with a dick in her mouth. It's obvious she's a carpet muncher.

First of all, "carpet muncher" is a bigoted and derogatory term, which is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if she is? What do you have against lesbians? It's none of your business if someone else likes dick or pussy or both or neither.

[Army of GOD]

natty(_)dread is a carpet muncher

[Ace Rimmer]

natty(_)dread is a carpet muncher

First of all, "carpet muncher" is a bigoted and derogatory term, which is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if she is? What do you have against lesbians? It's none of your business if someone else likes dick or pussy or both or neither.

[Army of GOD]

natty(_)dread is a carpet muncher

First of all, "carpet muncher" is a bigoted and derogatory term, which is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if she is? What do you have against lesbians? It's none of your business if someone else likes dick or pussy or both or neither.

But apparently it's natty(_)dread's business if someone is attracted to 14 year old pussy

[jonesthecurl]

natty(_)dread is a carpet muncher

First of all, "carpet muncher" is a bigoted and derogatory term, which is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if she is? What do you have against lesbians? It's none of your business if someone else likes dick or pussy or both or neither.

Shut up and smoke me a kipper.

[BigBallinStalin]

natty(_)dread is a carpet muncher

First of all, "carpet muncher" is a bigoted and derogatory term, which is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if she is? What do you have against lesbians? It's none of your business if someone else likes dick or pussy or both or neither.

Shut up and smoke me a kipper.

First of all, "kipper" sounds bigoted and derogatory, which most likely is forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, so what if he does smoke kippers? What do you have against smoking kippers? It's none of your business if someone else likes smoking kippers or not smoking kippers.

As a side note, however, there would be nothing wrong if said person wanted to willingly smoke kippers in the nude or next to sexy pictures on any magazine or whatever. Everyone has the right to decide about their own body, and I have nothing against kipper-smokers who are comfortable with their own sexuality.

[InkL0sed]

First of all, "bigoted and derogatory" sounds bigoted and derogatory, which is most likely forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, what if he is bigoted and derogatory? What do you have against bigots and derogatory people? It's none of your business if someone else likes being a bigot and derogatory.

As a side note, however, there would be nothing wrong if said person wanted to willingly be a bigot and derogatory in nude or sexy pictures on any magazine or whatever. Everyone has the right to decide about their own body, and I have nothing against bigots and derogatory people who are comfortable with their own sexuality.

[AndyDufresne]

First of all, "lists" (bulleted or other wise marked) look bigoted and derogatory, which is most likely forbidden by CC rules. Don't use such kinds of formatting for language. And since lists are a no-no, I mustn't continue on.


--Andy

[Army of GOD]

First of all, "conservative women" sounds bigoted and derogatory, which is most likely forbidden by CC rules. Don't use that kind of language.

Second of all, what if he is a conservative woman? What do you have against conservative women? It's none of your business if someone else likes being a conservative woman.

As a side note, however, there would be nothing wrong if said person wanted to willingly be a conservative woman in nude or sexy pictures on any magazine or whatever. Everyone has the right to decide about their own body, and I have nothing against conservative women who are comfortable with their own sexuality.

[Phatscotty]

[PLAYER57832]

Hollywood in general is a front for Obama. They are propagandizing us through their movies

Gotta get those reds out, yep...

Wasn't it just about a year ago that you claimed that your views had no connection to McCarthyism?

[Phatscotty]

Hollywood in general is a front for Obama. They are propagandizing us through their movies

Gotta get those reds out, yep...

Wasn't it just about a year ago that you claimed that your views had no connection to McCarthyism?

Not even close...

I was referring to this

Obama Officials Gave Hollywood Filmmaker Access To Team That Killed Bin Laden, Records Show
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/2 ... 38847.html

WASHINGTON -- Obama administration officials made information about the killing of Osama bin Laden available to a Hollywood director and screenwriter working on a movie about the successful raid, according to Pentagon and CIA records obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch.

The group released hundreds of pages of documents on Tuesday, secured under a Freedom of Information Act request, that it says show transcripts of meetings and communication between government agencies, Kathryn Bigelow, the Academy Award-winning director of "The Hurt Locker," and screenwriter Mark Boal.

[Woodruff]

Hollywood in general is a front for Obama. They are propagandizing us through their movies

Gotta get those reds out, yep...

Wasn't it just about a year ago that you claimed that your views had no connection to McCarthyism?

Not even close...

I was referring to this

Obama Officials Gave Hollywood Filmmaker Access To Team That Killed Bin Laden, Records Show
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/2 ... 38847.html

WASHINGTON -- Obama administration officials made information about the killing of Osama bin Laden available to a Hollywood director and screenwriter working on a movie about the successful raid, according to Pentagon and CIA records obtained by the conservative group Judicial Watch.

The group released hundreds of pages of documents on Tuesday, secured under a Freedom of Information Act request, that it says show transcripts of meetings and communication between government agencies, Kathryn Bigelow, the Academy Award-winning director of "The Hurt Locker," and screenwriter Mark Boal.

So every time the White House has allowed military access to television or movie writers/directors, it's propoganda? Because I can think of at least a few instances where I can't see any actual propoganda at all involved.

I'm curious as to specifically what Obama would be trying to propogandize with this move in your mind, given that eliminating bin Laden was something this country was specifically trying to do since before he took office. Do you just hate so much the fact that it's him who will be in the President's chair when it happens that you want to claim that's propoganda?


Besides which, what would that have to do with degrading conservative women?