pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.
Moderator: Community Team
pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
jonty125 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.
Iron Butterfly wrote:And Jak..by you playing Hall monitor you now make it difficult for people to speak their thoughts and change their minds.
If I decided I wanted to change my vote to Everywhere it would now appear I was bandwagoning and trying to "appear" town by hopping to the popular case.
aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
vodean wrote:jonty125 wrote:pmchugh wrote:
Now on to soft claiming... why? Why did you soft claim? Why did you not defend any of the points made against you? Why did you not hard claim instead?
Pratcially what he said. unvote vote everywhere L-2, I think.
jonty, it is this particular form of BW that catches people's eyes. for someone who is on a number of scumdars, atm, you should justify your every vote.
I move that we pressure jonty next, (tomorrow, if we lynch everywhere, or S7C, perhaps?)
That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
thechuck51 wrote:everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim.aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
That should be easy enough to prove. If somebody could put you at L-1, you could vote yourself. you can then cast a vote for yourself. If you are a priest nothing should happen, if you are lying you are lynched.
everywhere116 wrote:That's very bad form. If I was a mafioso, you would have given me something to fakeclaim..aage wrote:I think he will claim Sati - VT/hider, taking his hint into account. Let's see.
thechuck51 wrote:Can we have a vote count please?
vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
jak111 wrote:vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jak111 wrote:vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.
actually he never said his name just that he was priest. but your right he softclaimed it i think vodean was just asking for a hard claim.
thechuck51 wrote:Some7hingCLEVER wrote:jak111 wrote:vodean wrote:ok... thats really strange... maybe he's a joker? he could be toying with us... too late to worry about that now...
in any case, if you are town, 2 things.
1. please give us your name.
2. please explain to us some of your actions.
^ Major skimming. Check the last page? It says it all there o.e...
Anyway. Anyone who votes Everywhere before the vote count can consider themselves auto-lynched tomorrow. No townie would lynch someone when they are trying to prove that they are town.
actually he never said his name just that he was priest. but your right he softclaimed it i think vodean was just asking for a hard claim.
He said that aage was correct about the name (sati) but wrong about the role (priest not a hider). I think that qualifies as a hard claim.
jak111 wrote:Now that that's all solved, time for Saf to either post the lynch scene (I don't think mafia would hammer themselves) so I think someone should just 'unvote' for now. It won't effect the case because if he's lying he's already lynched, if not he's brought back down to L-2 at least.
jak111 wrote:Now that that's all solved, time for Saf to either post the lynch scene (I don't think mafia would hammer themselves) so I think someone should just 'unvote' for now. It won't effect the case because if he's lying he's already lynched, if not he's brought back down to L-2 at least.
everywhere116 wrote:However, you are correct. But I am not a hider. I'm a priest.
vodean wrote:im sorry, i just misread that post... i thought it was a typo.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users